Facts vs. Experience: How Science May Be Alienating Consciousness – Philip Goff, Ph.D., with Dave Asprey – #701

In a world rife with a pandemic, now may be just the right time to rethink our notions of science, consciousness and our broader reality.

In this episode of Bulletproof Radio, my guest is leading philosopher and consciousness researcher Philip Goff, Ph.D. He studies how to integrate consciousness into our scientific worldview and how consciousness blends with our general theory of reality. “Consciousness is everywhere,” he says.

His approach to consciousness is “a very general framework for bringing together what we know about ourselves from the inside with what science tells us about the body and the brain from the outside to bring them together in a single integrated picture of reality.”

“All we mean by consciousness here is subjective experience, pleasure, pain, visual or auditory experiences and so human experience is incredibly rich and sophisticated,” says Philip, who teaches at Durham University in England. “This is the result of millions of years of evolution by natural selection.”

?In his new book “Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness,” he goes all the back to the foundations of the scientific revolution, when Galileo’s decided to set consciousness outside of the domain of science.

Philip suggests that we need to rethink what science is in order to solve the problem of consciousness and offers up panpsychism as a radically new picture of human consciousness.

“So that’s the idea that basic building blocks have some kind of very rudimentary conscious experience,” Philip says. “But it doesn’t mean every random arrangement of those particles of those building blocks is conscious. It doesn’t mean that your cup of coffee is conscious. It just means that your cup of coffee is made up of little things that are conscious.”

Enjoy the show! And get more resources at Dave.Asprey/podcasts.

Listen on Apple Podcasts or iTunesListen on Google Podcasts

Follow Along with the Transcript

Facts vs. Experience- How Science May Be Alienating Consciousness – Philip Goff, Ph.D., with Dave Asprey – #701


More About Philip Goff
Book: “Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness”

Key Notes

  • We need to rethink what science is to solve the problem of consciousness. 1:49
  • 30 years ago panpsychism was just laughed at. 4:06
  • Can you define panpsychism in one sentence? – 5:56
  • All we mean by consciousness here is subjective experience. – 8:37
  • There’s more integrated information in the cells of a tree than there is in the tree as a whole. – 10:01
  • This form of panpsychism inspired by Bertrand Russell and Arthur Eddington is a very general framework. – 12:10
  • We think of Galileo as a experimental scientist but he was also a great philosopher. – 15:00
  • Neuroscience is where we are quantifying the brain in a way that you couldn’t really do 20 years ago. – 19:42
  • We postulate fundamental particles to explain what we can observe. – 22:30
  • Different people have exactly the same physical experience and have very different inner experiences. – 24:53
  • Physics tells us what the electron does, but not what it is. – 32:05
  • I just think there’s a different way of thinking about the history of science. – 37:04
  • Quantum mechanics is one of our most successful scientific theories in terms of prediction. – 40:27
  • The idea that consciousness plays a role in what’s called collapsing the wave function. – 43:33
  • The final chapter, I explore the sort of implications for human existence. – 48:55
  • We should judge a view on its explanatory power, not its cultural associations. – 53:51
  • The Western science perspective is, if I don’t have an explainable mechanism, it doesn’t work. – 57:05

Go check out my new book Super Human: The Bulletproof Plan to Age Backward and Maybe Even Live Forever and also “Game Changers“, “Headstrong” and “The Bulletproof Diet” on Amazon and consider leaving a review!

If you like today’s episode, check us out on Apple Podcasts at Bulletproof.com/apple and leave us a 5-star rating and a creative review.

You may also like

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Dave Asprey

Statements made on this website have not been evaluated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Information provided by this website or this company is not a substitute for individual medical advice. Articles and information on this website may only be copied, reprinted, or redistributed with written permission (but please ask, we like to give written permission!) The purpose of this Blog is to encourage the free exchange of ideas. The entire contents of this website is based upon the opinions of Dave Asprey, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective authors, who may retain copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the personal research and experience of Dave Asprey and the community. We will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this site; however, it is impossible to review all messages immediately. All messages expressed on the Blog, including comments posted to Blog entries, represent the views of the author exclusively and we are not responsible for the content of any message.