Dave Asprey

Are Psychedelics Bulletproof?

As a biohacker, I’ve made it my mission to look high and low for ways to upgrade my biology. Today I’m going to write about  a controversial biohacking topic: psychedelics.

First things first: psychedelics are illegal in the United States, and each one comes with significant risk. However, research and anecdotal evidence show that they can be powerful biohacks.

This article will look at the benefits and detriments of Ayahuasca, LSD (acid), psilocybin (mushrooms), and MDMA (ecstasy). I am not suggesting you use any of these. This article is purely informational. It’s based on a combination of clinical research, my personal experience, and the experiences of others.

The potential of psychedelics – In Bulletproof Radio #329 I chat with Dennis McKenna. Dennis is director of ethnopharmacology at the Heffter Research Institute, a non-profit organization looking at psychedelic therapy. In this 1-minute excerpt, he talks about the possible uses – and challenges – of psychedelics.

A brief history of psychedelic research

In the 1960s, psychedelics were an exciting new area of clinical research. LSD and psilocybin showed promise as therapies for everything from addiction to depression. More famously, though, they were a major part of the counterculture hippie movement at the time, drawing a lot of negative attention from politicians and government officials.

Ultimately, the US government classified psychedelics as Schedule I substances in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, claiming that they:

  • Have high potential for abuse
  • Have no medical use
  • Are unsafe, even under medical supervision

Today, a number of scientific organizations argue against psychedelics’ illegality. Research has found that psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin are non-addictive and effective forms of medicine when taken under a doctor or psychiatrist’s supervision. In the last 20 years, scientists like Bulletproof Radio guest Rick Doblin have convinced the government to allow psychedelic research again. So far it’s been promising.

Let’s take a closer look at each psychedelic and the research behind it.

Ayahuasca

I first took Ayahuasca in 2003 – in Peru, where it’s legal.

I was fat, burned out from Silicon Valley, and battling mold poisoning at the time. The traditional medical approach had failed me, so I began looking into alternative ways to improve my mood and cognitive performance. I ended up in a guest house in the Peruvian Andes, asking the owners – in horrifically broken Spanish – to connect me to an Ayahuasca shaman. I met the local shaman and we planned a ceremony for the following day.  I knew the shaman was good when he asked me whether I was taking MAO inhibitors or other antidepressants that interact with banisteriopsis caapi, one of the plants used to brew Ayahuasca.

At dawn the next morning, the shaman led me to a hill overlooking the Sacsayhuaman (pronounced “sexy woman”) ruins, just outside the capital of the ancient Incan Empire. He set up a tent and pulled out a little bag of stones, which he laid around us in a circle while he chanted.

I was skeptical of the stones and chanting, but I was willing to suspend my disbelief and enjoy watching.

The first cup, to my surprise, he poured right into his dog’s mouth. He explained that his dog always journeyed with him. He drank the next dose, and then gave a double dose to me (I’m 6’4” and weighed around 260 lbs. at the time).

I don’t remember much from the few hours that followed, but I did come away from the experience with enormous, bounding energy. It felt like my whole life up until that point I had to push to do everything because I was always tired. All of a sudden that was gone. The feeling lasted for several months.

Of all the psychedelics on this list, Ayahuasca has the least research behind it. What little there is, though, is promising.

Me and the Ayahuasca shaman, 2003 (just kidding. She was a friendly girl we met while hiking).

Benefits of Ayahuasca

  • In a 2015 pilot study, researchers gave Ayahuasca to 6 patients with treatment-resistant depression. The patients showed a ~70% decrease in depressive symptoms 21 days after taking a single dose of Ayahuasca and reported no significant side effects except vomiting shortly after drinking the brew, which is normal [1] (in fact, shamans consider it cleansing and essential to the experience).
  • 12 participants who did Ayahuasca-assisted therapy (therapy sessions while on Ayahuasca) reported significant decreases in alcohol and cocaine abuse 6 months after the therapy ended [2]. Interestingly, Ayahuasca-assisted therapy did not help with cannabis or painkiller use.

Downsides to Ayahuasca

  • The most serious risk with Ayahuasca is having a bad trip, which can lead to psychological trauma (see the section “Bad trips” below). If you do decide to use Ayahuasca, I recommend doing it legally, either in the US with an established Ayahuasca church, or in South America, with a shaman whom you trust. Ayahuasca tourism can be dangerous – there are a lot of charlatan “shamans” who don’t know what they’re doing. Try to find a referral from someone who has done it before and had a positive experience.

LSD (acid)

LSD is probably the most famous psychedelic. Ironically, it’s derived from a mycotoxin, ergotamine, that’s common in rye.

Effects and benefits of LSD

Swiss chemist Albert Hofmann discovered LSD’s effects in 1943 when he accidentally ingested some in his lab. He was terrified, at first, that he’d poisoned himself, but when his lab assistant checked his vitals and told him he was fine, he settled down. He later explained LSD’s effects:

“Little by little I could begin to enjoy the unprecedented colors and plays of shapes that persisted behind my closed eyes. Kaleidoscopic, fantastic images surged in on me, alternating, variegated, opening and then closing themselves in circles and spirals, exploding in colored fountains, rearranging and hybridizing themselves in constant flux.”

In addition to visual effects, LSD can open your mind to perspective-altering insights and intensify emotions, which may explain some of its therapeutic benefits.

  • A 2014 double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study recruited 9 people with life-threatening illnesses and gave them 2 sessions of LSD-assisted psychotherapy. The experience decreased anxiety and fear of death in 77.8% of participants [3]. The researchers followed up 12 months later and found that the effects had lasted. Participants also reported easier access to emotions and increased overall quality of life, with no negative side effects over the 12 month period.
  • A second double-blind, placebo-controlled study ran the same protocol with 12 participants who had life-threatening illnesses. Again, participants showed a significant decrease in anxiety 12 months after LSD-assisted therapy, and again, there were no negative side effects or safety issues [4].
  • A meta-analysis of 536 participants taken from studies in the ‘50s and ‘60s found that a single dose of LSD significantly decreased alcoholism [5]. Again, the effect lasted for many months after the single dose.
  • A 2006 study found that LSD and psilocybin both decreased intensity and frequency of cluster headaches [6].
  • A survey of 190,000 U.S. citizens found that hallucinogen use correlated with decreased psychological distress and decreased suicidality [7]. Another survey found that LSD is not associated with increased psychosis or depression [8].
  • LSD is not addictive [9,10].
  • Historically, not a single person has died from an LSD overdose [11].

And here’s an interesting side-note: Steve Jobs credits LSD for part of his success with Apple:

“Taking LSD was a profound experience, one of the most important things in my life. LSD shows you that there’s another side to the coin, and you can’t remember it when it wears off, but you know it. It reinforced my sense of what was important—creating great things instead of making money, putting things back into the stream of history and of human consciousness as much as I could.” — Steve Jobs

Downsides to LSD

A 2012 study ranked LSD the 4th safest recreational drug – far safer than alcohol or nicotine [12]. That doesn’t mean it’s without risk, though:

  • The most serious risk with LSD is having a bad trip, which can lead to psychological trauma (see the section “How to avoid a bad trip” below).
  • LSD also makes you more suggestible. You’re more likely to agree with something you wouldn’t normally agree with. This effect makes it especially important to surround yourself with good people you love and trust, if you decide to use LSD.
  • You may experience flashbacks – temporarily returning to a trip-like state – or lasting visual distortions from taking LSD or other hallucinogens. A UC Berkeley 2006 survey of more than 18,000 people concluded that this is likely to happen to fewer than 0.66% of hallucinogen users. The researchers also noted that their numbers could have been statistically meaningless, and that the actual prevalence may be even lower. Unfortunately, the study didn’t make it to publication and the data are no longer available online. It seems flashbacks and visual perception issues are unlikely – but they are possible.

Psilocybin (Mushrooms)

Psilocybin is the active ingredient in several varieties of psychedelic mushroom, the most common of which is the gold cap mushroom.

Effects and Benefits of psilocybin

Psilocybin, like LSD, makes you see colors more brightly. It can cause rippling and “breathing” effects, like inanimate objects are inhaling and exhaling, as well as synesthesia – the combination of senses, where you can see sounds, hear colors, etc.

I know. It sounds weird. It’s hard to imagine without experiencing it. Which I haven’t, of course. That would be illegal.

Psilocybin shares some of LSD’s benefits and brings new ones to the table as well:

  • Psilocybin decreases and prevents cluster headaches [6,13].
  • An fMRI scan study found that psilocybin affects the brain similarly to the way prescription antidepressants do, enhancing mood and positivity – but without any notable side effects [14].
  • A pilot study gave psilocybin to 9 people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Participants showed a marked improvement in OCD symptoms and OCD-related depression after taking psilocybin [15]. The improvements lasted for several months in most participants, and in some cases the OCD went away entirely. Interestingly, this study didn’t pair psilocybin with psychotherapy. The participants just took the drug and then sat by themselves in a comfortable room for 8 hours, listening to music chosen by the researchers.
  • A 2006 study from Johns-Hopkins gave 36 participants psilocybin to study its psychological effects. None of the participants had taken it or any other psychedelic before, and all of them were interested in spirituality or religion. They took 2-3 doses of psilocybin, with each dose two months apart. A third of the participants rated taking psilocybin as the most spiritually significant moment of their lives [16]. 70% rated it in the top 5 most meaningful experiences in their lives, on par with the birth of a child. Two months after the study, 79% of participants said they were happier overall and felt less anxious/depressed. 12 months after that, 64% of participants said their life satisfaction and happiness continued to be higher.
  • A 2011 study gave patients 2-5 doses of psilocybin, with 3 weeks between each dose. Participants reported lasting positive changes in personality a year later: increases in sensitivity, imagination, appreciation for beauty, and tolerance for others’ viewpoints and values [17].

Downsides to psilocybin

A 2011 study ranked psilocybin the safest common recreational drug, closely followed by cannabis [12]. However, it still has risks:

  • Possibility of a bad trip (see “Bad trips” below)
  • Lasting visual perception changes (again, a tiny percentage of people experience this, but it’s possible)
  • In the Hopkins study of spiritual meaning, about 1 in 5 participants reported anxiety or paranoia while on psilocybin [16]. However, the anxiety went away in all participants as soon as researchers reassured them. This emphasizes the importance of taking psychedelics in a supportive environment.

MDMA (Ecstasy)

MDMA, the main component of ecstasy, is in a different class than Ayahuasca, LSD, and psilocybin. MDMA is not strictly a psychedelic. It’s an amphetamine (stimulant) with some psychedelic properties. It also carries more risk than the other drugs on this list. We’ll get into that below. First, let’s take a look at the research on MDMA.

Benefits of MDMA

  • A 2008 pilot study planned to look at MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for 29 women with severe PTSD, but “political pressures” shut the study down before it could be completed. The researchers only ran 6 participants. In those 6 there were no side effects or downsides to using MDMA in low doses and in a medical setting [18].
  • Two years later, a successful pilot study used MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for 20 women with severe, treatment-resistant PTSD. 83% of patients showed significant healing of trauma, compared to 25% in the normal psychotherapy group [19]. There were no significant side effects.
  • In 2012, another study with a similar setup found that patients with PTSD self-reported improvements after MDMA-assisted therapy, and that the results lasted up to a year later [20]. The clinician’s interview found no significant improvement, although fellow scientists who looked at the data disagreed with the authors’ conclusions, interpreting that there was a large improvement in PTSD, and that the reason the data weren’t significant was that the study wasn’t large enough [21]. In any case, there were no negative side effects.

Downsides to MDMA

MDMA has more potential downsides than the other drugs on this list.

  • While all the drugs on this list are illegal (except Ayahuasca, under certain circumstances) and good sourcing is an issue, MDMA is the most difficult to find in a pure form. Mushrooms look like… well, mushrooms; a seller can’t really cut them with anything. LSD is rarely impure. With a good shaman or church, Ayahuasca is usually pure as well. MDMA is different. Because people use it as a party drug, it’s often cut with other stimulants like speed or meth. If you’re going to use MDMA, the safest way is to sign up for a clinical trial, where you’re getting pharmaceutical-grade MDMA in low doses.
  • MDMA causes intense euphoria, especially at higher doses, by releasing the stores of serotonin and dopamine in your brain. This can cause short-term withdrawal, anxiety, and depression if you take too much. Some people report withdrawal symptoms that last as long as three weeks. According to research, withdrawal isn’t an issue at lower doses.
  • At higher doses, MDMA destroys brain cells in primates [22].

Microdosing with psychedelics

You don’t have to take a full dose of a psychedelic to garner benefits. Microdosing is becoming more and more popular with entrepreneurs trying to get an edge. It involves taking around a tenth of a full dose of LSD or psilocybin. It’s not nearly enough to make you hallucinate and it hasn’t been studied, but people report that it produces some valuable effects nonetheless. According to recent news articles, many entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley are taking it a couple times a week; they report increased creativity, focus, empathy, and positivity.

A friend of mine – who happens to also be a CEO of a biohacking company – microdosed LSD every day for one month. He says he noticed increased creativity, especially with words, as well as a general lift in mood and occasional giggling during board meetings.

He also noticed increased suggestibility – a tendency to approve of others’ ideas. That impaired judgment could be a downside. Studies show that you build tolerance to LSD if you take it regularly, but my friend didn’t notice that when microdosing. He continued to get effects from the same small dose, every day.

Bad trips

The main risk with LSD, Ayahuasca, and psilocybin is having a bad trip – running into painful or negative thoughts that consume you and can cause lasting psychological damage. This is a very real downside. Protecting against a damaging bad trip comes down to what psychedelic researchers call “set and setting.”

  • Change your mindset. Many people view psychedelics as recreational drugs – akin to smoking pot or getting drunk. If you take a psychedelic purely to have a good time, you’re actually setting yourself up to have a bad time. Rick Doblin explains in the video below:
  • Look at a psychedelic trip as an experience, not a pursuit of pleasure. Acknowledge that something bad may come up, acknowledge that you can handle it and work through it, and set the intention to explore negative thoughts instead of running from them. This frames you for psychological growth instead of psychological trauma.
  • Take psychedelics in a safe, comfortable setting. Choose a place where you can stay undisturbed for 8-12 hours. Remove any pressures, appointments, or obligations.
  • Surround yourself with close friends and/or loved ones. It’s best to have people with you whom you trust. If something bad does come up, they’ll be able to support you and help you work through it. They will also lend a general feeling of security to your experience. The safer you feel, the more productive your trip will be.
  • Don’t combine psychedelics with other drugs, including alcohol.

A few final thoughts

Psychedelics show great promise as alternatives to current pharmaceutical drugs, but they come with significant risk.  They’re also illegal, and you absolutely should not take them lightly.

If you do decide to try a psychedelic, one option is to sign up for legal psychedelic medicine clinical trials.  Otherwise, be mindful of set and setting, find a source you trust, and be aware that you’re taking a risk and probably breaking the law.

I know this is a controversial topic. I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences in the comments. Please, keep it friendly. Thanks for reading, have a great week, and subscribe below for more biohacking content.

[expand title=”Click to read the complete list of references.” swaptitle=”Click to hide references.”]

  1. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000100013&lng=en&nrm=iso
  2. http://www.maps.org/research-archive/ayahuasca/Thomas_et_al_CDAR.pdf
  3. http://www.maps.org/research-archive/lsd/Gasser2014-JOP-LSD-assisted-psychotherapy-followup.pdf
  4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086777/
  5. http://jop.sagepub.com/content/26/7/994
  6. http://www.maps.org/research-archive/w3pb/2006/2006_Sewell_22779_1.pdf
  7. http://jop.sagepub.com/content/29/3/280
  8. http://jop.sagepub.com/content/29/3/270
  9. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030437
  10. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/hallucinogens
  11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19040555
  12. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/2/4/e000774.full.html
  13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352222
  14. http://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(14)00275-3/abstract
  15. http://www.maps.org/research-archive/w3pb/2006/2006_Moreno_22868_1.pdf
  16. http://www.csp.org/psilocybin/Hopkins-CSP-Psilocybin2006.pdf
  17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3537171/
  18. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02791072.2008.10400637
  19. http://jop.sagepub.com/content/25/4/439.long
  20. http://jop.sagepub.com/content/27/1/40.full
  21. http://www.maps.org/research-archive/mdma/JPsychopharmacol-2013-Chabrol-865-6.pdf
  22. http://mdma.net/toxicity/ricaurte.html

 

Sleep, Sex & Tech at the Bulletproof Conference – #327

Why you should listen –

On this special episode of Bulletproof Radio, we take a look at a couple of conversations that
took place during last year’s Bulletproof Conference. First, “Orgasm Expert” Eli Block of OneTaste answers a Q&A with a focus on OMing and Bulletproof sex. Next, we get to hear Dave speak to the audience about sleep tracking and other sleep hacks, along with the tech soon to be featured at Bulletproof Labs. Enjoy the show!

Tickets are available now for the 2016 Bulletproof Conference and we’re running a discount on 3-Day passes, click here to learn more!

Today’s episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. To claim your 30-day free trial, go to www.freshbooks.com/bulletproof and enter “Bulletproof Radio” in the “How You Heard About Us” section.

Bulletproof Executive Radio at the iTunes, App Store, iBookstore, and Mac App Store

Watch

Listen

[Tweet “Teach kids to regulate their own brain. It’s worth so much more than memorizing state capitals.”]

Follow Along with the Transcript!

[expand title=”CLICK HERE to read along with the transcript!” swaptitle=”Click to hide transcript”]

Click here to download a PDF of this transcript

Announcer:    Bulletproof Radio. A state of high performance.

Dave:  You’re listening to Bulletproof Radio with Dave Asprey. Today’s cool fact of the day is that most people don’t know how a grenade works, and Hollywood doesn’t really help. The pin on a grenade prevents the lever or spoon from flipping off, which arms the fuse on the grenade. The standard grenade, M67, can usually go about 30 or 35 meters, or just call it yards, because after all it’s government, at least that’s by a man, The fuse delays detonation for about 4 to 5 seconds after the spoon is released which gives the grenade time to travel that far. It’s a lot less dramatic than they make it in Hollywood.

 

You might ask why the heck is Dave talking about grenades today? It’s because the Bulletproof Conference in September is going to totally blow up, and I’m a huge fan of really, really bad puns, and that was one for sure. You can actually thank my buddy Brock here, who helped me come up with that, or I should say, maybe forced me to come up with it.

 

Before we get going on today’s episode, there’s something else way more interesting than grenades, although actually blowing stuff up is kind of fun. If you haven’t heard about FreshBooks yet, listen up. These folks are on a serious mission to help small business owners save time, and avoid a lot of the stress that comes with running a business. As a business owner, it’s really important to be able to see everything. Which clients that owe you, which invoices that have been paid, and how your business is doing right now on the dashboard. You get that from FreshBooks.

 

Using FreshBooks, you can take about 30 seconds to create and send an invoice, and you get paid online because FreshBooks gives your clients tons of ways they can just pay you, with credit cards, or other ways, which can seriously improve how quickly you get paid. In fact, customers get paid 5 days faster on average. FreshBooks is offering 30 days of unrestricted use to all Bulletproof listeners, totally free right now, and you don’t need a credit card to sign up. To claim your 30 day free trial go to freshbooks.com/Bulletproof, and enter Bulletproof Radio in the how you heard about us section.

 

I am so pleased to announce 2 new roasts of Bulletproof processed coffee beans. These are mold free, independently lab tested coffees, and they’re made at our Bulletproof plantations. We just changed how we roast them. The first new roast is called the Mentalist. It’s available in whole bean and ground, it’s a medium to dark roast, right in the middle there. It’s got dark cocoa and vanilla aromatics that open up to a rich full bodied coffee with some cherry sweetness, and notes of almond and caramel in there as well. It’s profoundly good. I’ve been putting it in my espresso machine, and man, it’s crazy. You take it, and it’s engineered to taste amazing with butter and brain octane oil. A lot of coffee tastes bitter and weird when you put butter in it. Not this stuff because, well, we built it that way.

 

The next one is for you if you really like your dark flavored, dark roast coffee. It’s called French Kick. It’s a dark roast, but it’s not charcoal. It’s smooth and sweet, it’s pleasantly, almost a little bit smokey. It’s got baking chocolate notes, but it finishes really clean, and has a medium body. This is one of the few dark roast coffees I like. I’m not a fan of those burned things that you might find at the corner coffee shop. This isn’t one of those, but we pushed it as close to dark as we could get, and still maintain that flavor for you. You will be amazed at how you feel when you have this coffee, just like you are with our existing coffee. Now you’ve got a whole palate of coffees you can play with, depending if you like espresso, French press, immersion, or just drip brewing. However you like your coffee, you can do it, and you’re going to just be amazed at the flavors. I’m excited to share these with you.

 

Today’s podcast is a special edition of Bulletproof Radio, and it was recorded at the Bulletproof Conference last year. It’s with Eli Block from One Taste. One Taste is a group of people looking at the effects of orgasm on human consciousness and human performance. In case you’re wondering, the content here is, shall we say, anti climactic in that it’s not inappropriate in any way shape, or form. We’re talking about science, and we’re talking about emotions, but we’re not talking about getting down, if you know what I’m saying. To encourage you to check this out, head on over to the video page and I’ll give you the URL in a second, and at the end of the video there’s a substantial special discount on the Bulletproof Conference. If you’re thinking about attending the Bulletproof Conference, you want to see what it’s like, this is a good video for you to see, and if you watch it, and learn, and hear the same things you’re going to hear if you’re just listening to the iTunes version, we’ll give you a pretty substantial discount there.

 

So head on over to Bulletproofexec.com/orgasmvideo. Yes, Bulletproofexec.com/orgasmvideo.

 

Eli:       Hi Bulletproof audience, this is Eli Block from OneTaste. www.onetaste.us. I have some follow up questions from the podcast I did with Dave the other day that I’d love to answer. Here we go. Number one. Calilove on twitter wants to know, you mentioned it briefly in your talk with Dave, but I wonder what you’re in depth thought of the new female Viagara, or Flibasaren, and how it will effect women’s sexual experiences, and for that matter, their orgasms. Well Kayla, that is a great question.

 

I spoke to orgasmic medicine specialist, Theresa Diaz, MD, about her take on the new female viagra, and here’s what she had to say. She said that it must be taken for more than a month in continuously. It’s effectiveness rate is between 8 and 13% which is actually quite low. The improvement in pleasurable sex was from 2.8 events per month to 4.5 events per month. There are side effects such as fainting, dizziness, and low blood pressure, many of which were found to be exacerbated by alcohol and hormonal contraceptions, so forget your birth control. Not yet on the market, and it’s only prescribable by a doctor who’s taken a certification class.

 

So, on the one hand it sounds like a really good idea that for some people who want to pop a pill, this could actually lead to some more enjoyment. Now, there’s a whole barrel of monkeys involved in actually getting one of these pills, and seeing eventually down the line, after taking it for a month and possibly fainting, and all those things, that it’s actually going to work for you. My perspective is, why don’t you try something which actually gets you closer to your partner, which builds both of your intimacy and connection, and is a natural alternative to a pharmaceutical hack which is actually relatively unproven at this point? Thanks for your question.

 

Number two: Sojim from the forum writes, Taoism lays its spiritual belief on a mysterious force or chi that is supposed to inhabit matter in any form, living or non living. According to the Taoists, chi or semen was responsible for sound, body and mind. Practitioners of this conviction avoid ejaculating too much of their semen during sex. Well, Sojim, to us, orgasm is also chi, not just what a man would ejaculate. There’s actually a few different questions rolled into this one which I’ll address. One of them is that I think too much, and your question was, avoid ejaculating too much. I agree with you, I think too much is definitely something that each person has to assess for themselves. I love Dave’s take on this. I love the experiment that he did around ejaculation. I think that is brilliant, and I learned something myself from that experiment.

 

What I will say, I’ve got two other things for you. One is that I’ve heard the viewpoint that you should basically save all of your semen, and save it, and save it, and save it, and save it, and potentially die with all of it. It makes me think of this guy I knew when I was a little kid. He was rich. This guy had so much money, he didn’t know what to do with it. He wouldn’t spend any on himself. He had these ratty old jeans, and beat up pair of tennis shoes, and kind of the same outfit every day, drove an old beat up car, and lived in a crappy house, and his whole life was just devoted to the acquisition of wealth. He never really got to enjoy any of it. My take on climax is, I think it’s actually there to be enjoyed. I think there’s something really awesome about enjoying all of the riches that you build up. That’s the first thing.

 

The second thing is, I’ll give you my own personal viewpoint. I’m married, and I think that, well, I’m the kind of guy who honestly has a hard time going out of control. One of the things that I find women find really frustrating in sex, in my experience, my wife included, is when I’m in too much control. I think the whole point of connection is to take us out of control. If we’re concentrated on controlling this experience, and controlling this experience, and controlling this experience, and making sure this thing was going to happen, whoops we climax every now and then, that’s not very much fun to someone who’s actually interested in taking you out of control. If you’ve ever noticed, women have a really fine knack for doing that. That’s my viewpoint, you read it out however you want to.

 

Okay, OGMan has a great question from online. He asks, can psychedelics help a person’s oming person, what about sex and pot? Well, OGMan, here’s what I think. Oming is actually a consciousness practice. It’s a meditative practice where you’re doing your best to be as present as possible without adding anything extra. To that point, Om is a nothing extra practice, so we don’t play music during Om, we don’t add really intense spiritual overlay to the practice so that you have to learn some other God and Goddess forms thing just to have a connect experience with your partner. We don’t Om in exotic locations, attempting to affect our experience.

 

We do everything we can to control the conditions that the practice takes place because here’s what we’ve found. Changing the conditions outside of yourself doesn’t really help you get free. There’s no freedom in hoping that that person, or that person, does something different so that you can have a more peaceful, more amazing life. Change actually happens from within. That’s why we don’t augment our Om practice with drugs, or again music, or any of the other things like candles, or any of the other things that we would do to try to create conditions that would give us a more intense, or more meaningful, or more psychedelic experience. Om is a practice of you learning to use your attention, and grow your consciousness to experience more and more and more of your partner. I would have to have it be that you’ve got an Om practice dependent, that your awareness in this world is dependent on your psychedelics.

 

You get in the next great fight with your partner, and you both have to do acid in order to actually get to the important part of the argument where you guys kiss and make up, come on, does anybody really want that? Oming is a practice where you can actually go into these expanded states, and go into these intense experiences, and actually use the same muscles in the rest of your life, whether it be in your sex life, or your business life, or anywhere else you can use it. We say always do 15 minutes, always do it the exact same way so that you’re not changing the conditions to get more freedom.

 

Trish, Trish from California writes, do sex toys benefit or deter from an Oming practice? It’s a great question Trish. I think that I talk about this a little bit in the Bulletproof podcast with Dave, but the thing about vibrators is that they vibrate. You’ve got a set of very delicate nerve endings on the clitoris, between 8 and 80,000 nerve endings depending on who you talk to in the medical profession, they’ll say between 8 and 80,000, okay. At the surface of the skin they get very tendril like and very very fine. What ends up happening with vibrator use is that you have to get bigger, and bigger ones.

 

I remember I had a girlfriend once, who showed me the evolution of her vibrators. It was like, oh, I started with the cute little rabbit one, and then going faster and harder with that, she lost some sensitivity so she had to get the other one with the slightly bigger, 100 more horsepower version, right? Then after that, had to get the Mitsubishi, like plugs into the wall. The thing about using vibrators that you’ve got to go harder, and you’ve got to go faster for the most part. You’ve gotta increase pressure, and in order to get the same results you were once getting.

 

What you’re doing is you’re going into those nerves as opposed to drawing the nerves out to full extension and increasing your sensitivity. That’s the benefit of actually having a practice which increases your sensitivity. A lot of women don’t realize why they feel like they don’t have the orgasm they want, they don’t have the power in their sex that they want, in a lot of cases of using vibrators it’s because over time they’ve actually deadened their response trying to get more and more out of it. For that reason, Om tends to be a rehabilitative process for a woman’s nerve endings, and for her sensitivity in her genitals.

 

Thomas from Facebook writes, you discuss Oming as helping people with intimacy, not desire. Couldn’t sexual desire be considered intimate if shared between 2 people? The short answer is, yes. I’m sorry that it didn’t come across all the way in the video and the podcast, but I think what I was probably getting at, and this maybe answers your question, is that sexual activity, desire, all of it, it can either be connected, or disconnected. I think all of us have an experience of having someone approach us with the desire that doesn’t really feel connected.

 

Maybe we’ve had sex, or a make out, or something which hasn’t really felt that connected to us. Om helps people connect. It’s really that simple. That connection can be in the sexual realm of course, it can be in the desire realm of course. I put all those things, and intimacy, I put all those things in the same box. Does Om help with connection, and having the connected versions of all of those things? Absolutely. Are there artificial versions of all those things? Absolutely. That’s what I was talking about with Dave on the podcast when I mentioned there’s so many alternatives to having an actual life human being, like vibrators, like porn, which we can consume and consume and consume, and never actually fill us up, or never actually satiate our appetites. It’s beginning to shift from a disconnected modality of all of those things, everything under that category, to a more connected reality, first bringing an actual human being into the picture, and second, learning how to actually connect. Learning how the physics of connection actually work between people.

 

Jdog on Facebook writes, you and Dave talk about Oming when single, and Dave even said, “sex starts when 2 people are in the room.” But what if you don’t want a partner? How can you use Oming to get closer to yourself by choice? Well, Jdog, here’s the rub about Oming. Om is a partnered practice because you cannot take yourself out of control. You cannot take yourself anywhere new that you have not been before. You can’t tickle yourself, you can’t spontaneously high five yourself, there’s all of these things that connection as a biological imperative is going to demand that you do, or else we would all just stay at home, isolated watching reruns of whatever your favorite TV show is, Scrubs, and so Om is a practice which gives you a biological imperative to connect, and grows you as a human being in the process.

 

Thanks for your questions, and thanks for having me. If you’re interested in knowing more about orgasm, orgasmic meditation, or myself, you can find us online at www.OneTaste.us. My twitter handle is @elicanplay. @elicanplay. I’m also on Facebook, and you can find me at EliBlock.com.

 

Announcer:    Please welcome to the stage Mr. Dave Asprey.

 

Dave:  I’ve been tracking my sleep for a long time, including, actually it’s been a little more than 900 nights of sleep data. That’s just using an iPhone app. I used to use the Zeo, and a few other things. I had a bedit sensor which I really liked until it quit working because they changed their software back end, and I guess you have to have the Bluetooth version, but I had the professional version, so I wish I still had a working Bedit, but all of that time I also used my iPhone because it’s the simplest monitor, and I would encourage all of you when you’re looking at tracking data, the easier it is, or even if it’s completely invisible to gather data, then you’ve got something really interesting. But if you have to apply a lot of effort to get your data, you probably are going to quit doing it, because applying effort requires willpower, and honestly, you could use willpower to track something, or to change something big, use the willpower for the big stuff, and don’t waste it on tracking data unless it’s in the service of something you’re specifically hacking that’s going to be big.

 

I’m going to share with you some things that happened at Bulletproof Labs, the location up on Vancouver Island where I do all sorts of crazy stuff, and address some of your top questions, so we get some answers for you guys.

 

What happens when you take Gaba? If you look at this slide, zero percent is, well, it’s zero percent, it means nothing happened. If the bar’s green, it means there was a slight improvement, and if the bar is red it means you didn’t get a slight improvement. Every night when I go to bed, I pull out my phone, which has a zentech screen protector on it, which means I’m not killing my melatonin for 4 hours, and it’s also dimmed all the way, so I don’t mind doing this, and the app that I’m running actually has a black background because it’s well designed. I’ve filled out about 30 or so variables that I track. If I did it that day, I tick a box.

 

That way over time, I can get a picture that says, all right, did I do this, did it make a difference. I take a little bit of Gaba before I go to sleep most nights. Probably enough nights that I’ve lost the signal from it, because I take it most nights. I don’t track that I take 500mg, or 2 and a half grams. There are studies of growth hormone that say you should take 2 and a half grams of Gaba, but if you take too much Gaba it makes you pant, so maybe you don’t want to take too much Gaba. Some amount of Gaba might be helpful. Gaba’s an amino acid that enhances calmness. It’s also a neurotransmitter. It’s an inhibitory, or calming neurotransmitter.

 

What I found is that I don’t get that big of a difference in my sleep quality. It could be in the data, it could be not much else, but I do feel like it’s worth taking some Gaba because there’s lots of science around that. Gaba wave, which we just had this top manufacturing, was noticeably more effective, and I’m sorry about that, not my decision. But when you can’t get the good stuff, you don’t make it anymore.

 

With Gaba Wave I am working, though, on a replacement that I can get on a regular basis that I think is going to have a very similar effect, we’ll tell you after I’m done testing it. It’s interesting, though, that the difference between adding a phenal ring to something makes a noticeable change to sleep quality. But it’s still just a little bit of a change. That said, when you’re dealing with looking at data that you’re tracking, the quality of the data is important as well, and the metric for sleep quality includes length of sleep. Does this data say that I just slept more, or that I slept better? The problem with every sleep tracking system out there is that it includes length of time as a substantial variable which maybe it shouldn’t, unless you get to pick the amount of time.

 

If 6 hours is your target goal, and you slept 6 hours, and you got a lot of really good quality sleep in there, that’s different than if your goal is 8 hours and you got a lot of low quality sleep in there. This idea of sleep quality versus sleep quantity is not well represented yet in our sleep tracking software. But in the meantime, this is a combination of number of times you’ve been in a cycle, as well as length. Maybe I sleep a little bit more on Gaba Wave.

 

If I do hyperbaric oxygen, that’s getting to be a substantial difference. On the days where I do hypebaric, I sleep better. That’s kind of cool. It helps to have hyperbaric in Bulletproof Labs versus having to go out somewhere and give it a shot. If you go out somewhere and do email, or watch Netflix for an hour inside a hyperbaric chamber, it wasn’t too expensive, you’d probably do it sometimes, especially after a long flight if it made you sleep better.

 

What about doing that thing I’ve been recommending ever since I started writing Bulletproof, which is heart rate variability training. If I do heart rate variability training, there’s a substantial improvement in my sleep quality. I can do that in one of two ways. I can do it with a sensor, or I can close my eyes and do it without the sensor, and I have about the same effect. In this case, I track it on the days when I actually do heart rate variability, which, by the way, isn’t every day. Honestly, my sympathetic nerve system is generally in reasonable shape.

 

What about when I stick a laser on my head? You guys don’t do that? There are medical lasers that increase mitochondrial function, cause you to grow new mitochondria, increase metric oxide, and increase blood flow in the brain. They can have a pretty profound effect, actually, but not, it turns out, on sleep very much. I usually do my laser inside hyperbaric oxygen because what the heck, you’ve got more oxygen, might as well use it.

 

Do carbs at night really make a difference? For some people they really do, but not that much for me. It also depends on the type of carbs.

 

Hmm. Turns out that orgasms do not improve sleep quality even if they knock you out, at least for guys. No, I’m not talking about frequency, that was a talk I gave at Quantified Self in 2012, I think.

 

Pulse electromagnetic frequency devices. I have a variety of them that I use, and when I use one of those, it does improve sleep quality, which is kind of interesting, right? This is almost 3 years worth of testing this stuff on whatever I felt like doing that day.

 

If I try resistant starch it works better than just random carbs at night, however I don’t really find that it makes that big of a difference. I don’t use resistant starch right now. I think there’s been a really big war online about resistant starch. It’s the coming of the Lord. There’s probably some useful for certain kinds of structured starch, but just generally saying more resistant starch is better, I’m going to eat a bag of green banana flour because then I’ll have more gut bacteria, I think you might be missing a few things in that overall equation, however having the right kinds of stuff growing in your gut, at even the right times, there’s good benefit for that. Intelligent use of prebiotics is a good idea, but there was a change in sleep when I did some resistant starch at night. I only did that for about 3 or 4 months because it just wasn’t worth the trouble, and I didn’t see any other of the amazing benefit changes that you’re supposed to see from it.

 

Hmmm. Sex and orgasm, why would this be different? Because you can have sex without having an orgasm, but it turns out that it’s almost exactly the same here. I was sort of thinking that when I looked at the data before that orgasm made me sleep a little bit less better than just plain sex, but it turns out that’s not exactly the case, they look almost identical. I’d have to look at the percentage difference for you guys to tell you if there was one. I’m pretty intrigued at the idea that if you have lots and lots of orgasms, as a man, it definitely lowers your energy. What it does to your sleep, I’m not quite sure. I can tell you when it does happen, it doesn’t seem to help.

 

What about just having a stressful day. Like all right, did I feel like it was a stressful day? Actually it seems like you sleep better to recover from stress. Isn’t that a good thing? It could also be that you sleep worse. It’s a question of how good you are at managing stress. Acknowledging that there was stress and recovering from it is a skill versus, I was stressed therefore I didn’t sleep.

 

How many people here have a hard time getting to sleep on a stressful day? Only 4 of you? It’s roughly, it looks like maybe a third to a half. That’s not uncommon. A lot of times it’s that racing mind. Breathing exercises can make a huge difference. Heart rate variability techniques can make a big difference. I have not had a night where I’ve had thoughts keep me asleep, in at least 7 or 8 years. It doesn’t happen anymore. It used to happen all the time. Just can’t get to sleep. But when you train your brain, and when you basically go in and re pattern the parts of your brain that are seeing something out there as an existential threat that’s actually not a threat, when you get that done, you really can go to sleep when you need to go to sleep, and then you have this effect, stressful day, better sleep.

 

Theanine is a calming amino acid found in green tea. It’s great for relaxation, and just a moderate improvement in sleep. It’s possible, I take Theanine in the morning and at night, particularly because Theanine raises alpha in the brain. It’s a very common supplement out there. Because it raises alpha waves by up to 20% depending on dose, and depending on your brain, I think it’s generally a good idea to have it. It could be just because I take it almost all the time that it goes down just average. I suppose I should quit taking it for a couple months and quit the data, but I kind of like the way I feel on it, so I’m not going to do that. I am lazy.

 

Remember when I say don’t drink coffee after 2? Wait, doesn’t it say coffee after 4? Sometimes I have coffee at 2:30 if I’m recording an extra episode of Bulletproof Radio, and I pay the price just like I said I would. Right? So really, I had coffee right before this, ugh, crap, I did it again.

 

What about cryotherapy? When I, instead of spending an hour in cold the way Wim would, I violate the laws of nature and get way colder than mother nature would let me do it for 3 minutes because I’m lazy, just kidding. I think one’s idea of being in cold ocean water is a good one, too. They activate different cold receptors as well. Cryotherapy does improve sleep quality, and whenever I’m hope I do cryotherapy at least once a day, and sometimes twice a day. Unless I run out of liquid nitrogen which is a problem that we all face.

 

I also have a custom made software that allows me to move my brain into a delta state using sounds. This shows that it decreases sleep quality, but what actually happens, I only run that on nights when I’m really not going to get enough sleep. I’m forcing myself to go more into a delta state rather than into a REM state. I believe what’s going on here is that when I use that stuff, that does make me feel more refreshed when I wake, I’m probably doing it on nights when I only got 3 or 4 hours of sleep.

 

If I drink coffee at all during the day, which is most days, there’s a very tiny improvement in sleep, but it’s probably not statistically significant. Does coffee make you not sleep at night? Not for me. But for you, it’s entirely possible if you have a problem metabolism caffeine, it does, in which case there’s something called decaf. For the most part, a cup of coffee in the morning, or maybe one in the morning and one at lunch, which is the most I ever really have, you are not going to have a hard time with sleep. Doing it after 2? Not so good. At least these numbers are pretty useful.

 

Electrical stimulation. I sleep not as well when I do electrical stimulation, but it is an incredible burden the way I do it. I really work myself out beyond what I could really do without electrical stimulation, so that could be an exhaustion effect.

 

Flotation tank? Which is a really interesting technology. Float tanks allow you to turn off a lot of the stuff in the environment around you. I’ll show you what mine looks like in a little bit. The flotation tank also allows you to reset your amygdala, these really core flight or fight fear parts of the brain. If I lay there for an hour in a magnesium solution, I’m getting magnesium which improves sleep quality, through my skin, and I’m also getting this deep calming of the brain which has a small effect on improving sleep quality.

 

Taking 5HTP, small improvement in sleep quality, which is a common sleep thing.

 

Now, hypoxia. Intermittent hypoxia. If you were to breathe really heavy to get way too much oxygen to the body, to get hyperoxic and then say hold your breath and do push ups until you had none left and you dumped all that oxygen out of your body. I didn’t do it that way, I actually used an oxygen scrubber that I was breathing through to achieve hypoxia, but on the days I did that, I did sleep better, which is probably because I was recovering more aggressively.

 

If you eat a late dinner, for me it doesn’t make a big difference, and I noticed that there’s lots of myths about, oh, if you eat at night you’ll get fat, or it’ll ruin your sleep. It’s true if you have a lot of protein, especially the protein that raises your insulin levels at night, it can change the level of a substance in the brain called Orexin which is stimulating, and you don’t sleep as well. Guess what drug affects orexin levels? Modafinil. One of my favorites. Eating a steak at night, turns out there’s a reason I recommend collagen if you’re going to have protein before bed, because it’s not one of those proteins like whey protein, which I also make. Do that one in the morning, just do it once a day, do it in the afternoon, but not right before bed. I don’t think whey’s great for most people. There are few people that benefit from whey, but I recommend taking them separately.

 

Cerebral electrical stimulation. The Russian sleep machine designed to give you more sleep in less time. Wait, less time. That damn data comes up again. When am I going to be running my Russian sleep machine running electric current between my ears? I’m going to be doing it on the nights when I’m only getting 3 hours of sleep, so the data is not going to be good here. I can tell you flat out, if you want to sleep almost nothing and wake up feeling human, the reason the Russians invented the cerebral electrical stimulation was this really cool thought. It’s Russian engineering at its finest, by the way, Russian engineers kick ass.

 

What they thought was, it’s expensive to send astronauts to space. Let’s make them not sleep, and we can send 1/3 less. It’s brilliant. They applied, instead of all these dollars to buying rocket propellant and building bigger rocket ships, they applied it to research on sleep. They made a little device that runs a current across your brain, and lets you feel refreshed after less sleep. Is it as good as a full night’s sleep, probably not. If you’re on a spaceship is your circadian rhythm kind of jacked anyway? I would think so, but I never really tried living on a space ship so I wouldn’t really know for sure.

 

What if you have carbs really late at night? Just the midnight snack? Well, it turns out slight decrease in sleep quality, but it’s not the end of the world.

 

What if you refrigerate your mattress? Okay. Run some ice water through your mattress. You guys don’t do this? I had a device that did that. Unfortunately it kept leaking water on the floor, which was a problem given that whole mold thing, so I decided that I was going to stop that, but I really liked having a cold mattress when I had it. Plus it kept beeping and waking me up, which I didn’t like. Other than that, a cold mattress is really cool. It’s just hard to pull off in real life.

 

Why do I have theta on here two times? Interesting. Delta, thank you. Delta and theta. Delta is the very, very deep, almost dreamless sleep where you’re getting growth hormone release, and theta is the dreaming state, so if you want to increase dreaming, you can do this. I typically don’t do this very often. I used to do it quite a bit. I’ve tried commercial theta software, I’ve written my own tones, this shows a slight decrease in sleep quality, and I don’t exactly know why, but I would imagine it’s probably because instead of doing the cycles that my brain would have done, that I’m [inaudible 00:33:39] more dreams, more dreams, more dreams, so it’s not going through the alpha cycles. It’s interesting that you can manipulate this at all.

 

What’s the effect of travel on sleep? I use my monitor when I travel all the time, and I tick that box that says traveling. Traveling screws up your sleep. You’d expect it to, right? Time zones, airplanes, hotels, horrible lighting in hotel rooms, you can’t close the windows all the way, you have to tape over them with aluminum foil, and then the staff gets all mad at you. This happens to you guys, right? I don’t really bring foil, but I will offer an amazing travel tip. You look in the closet, and they have those hangers with little hangers to hold your pants. Do you really need clippies to hold your pants? Probably not, but those clippies will hold the curtains together really, really well. That’s what I use them for.

 

On the days when I do the Bulletproof Vibe which increases lymphatic circulation I do sleep better. My theory for the reason behind this, that is entirely not born out by a study, is that one of the functions of sleep is to pump out toxic proteins that build up in the brain, so you have your glymphatic system that pumps cerebral spinal fluid into the brain, washes it, and pumps it back out again. If you’ve already done some oxygenation, and you’ve done some lymphatic drainage, I think that your detoxing systems that work at night probably have an easier time of it, so you may get better quality sleep. It could also be a neurological effect, I don’t really know, but I do like how I feel. I’ve done the Bulletproof Vibe today. When I was doing one of the interviews that wasn’t on video, just a little while ago, I stood on the Bulletproof Vibe. The reporter thought I was weird.

 

Does a workout make you sleep better? In my case marginally better because you want to recover better from a workout.

 

That was 900 days of sleep data and what I learned straight from the horses mouth. How can you apply that? Actually the things that were bigger on there, maybe you can try those things ahead, but the more interesting thing is, how much time did it take me to get this data? Here’s what I do.

 

You guys set your alarm to know what time you’re going to wake up the next day unless you’re one of those amazing people that doesn’t have kids and doesn’t have to get them at school at a certain time, or doesn’t have a job where you have to get there on time, so assuming you set an alarm, by the way, how many of you wake up without an alarm every morning? Holy crap, you guys are weird. Just kidding. Roughly 20, 25%.

 

The rest of you who set alarms, or at least the few who have backup alarms, what I do is I fire up the alarm app, Sleep Cycle, it’s a free or $2 inexpensive app. I just go in and I say, here’s all the things I’m interested, the things I think might matter, or things I just want a record of did I do that. I check check check, it literally takes me 10 seconds. Then I pick what time I want to wake up. My alarm also, I give it a 20 minute window. If I want to wake up at 7am it will wake me up between 6:40 and 7am when I’m already at the top of a sleep cycle, which means I have never been jolted awake unless it’s by a child screaming and running at me or something, and that will violate the alarm.

 

The really cool thing there is that I’m getting a better alarm than I would have had from any other kind of alarm system, and I got all this data, and it took me almost no time more than just setting the alarm in order to have almost 3 years of sleep data that’s there. And it’s not just sleep data. It’s behavior data. Do I really care how many times I orgasm in the last 3 years. If I’m ever in a debate with Lana about that subject, I don’t know how valuable that data is to be honest, but it’s one of those things where it was almost free to get it, that data may be useful, may be interesting.

 

I would encourage you though, in your self tracking, do not over obsess on data that you’re not going to use for anything. For me, I just want to know what makes me sleep better. This has been kind of enlightening. The things you think would help, if you read, is supposed to be the coming of Jesus, at least it wasn’t for my sleep. It was a rounding error just about.

 

Let’s switch gears, and let’s talk about what’s actually in Bulletproof labs. I’m working to make these technologies not like, look at weird people do, but more like why are these not in high school gyms, why are these not widely accessible because these are ways that everyone can get more out of the amount of time and the amount of effort they put into what they do.

 

Here’s one of the things you’d see there. You’d see cryotherapy. That would be me at 256 below zero. I’d beat doctor Lana by 3 degrees and I look more happy than she does, it’s pretty clear. This seems, how many of you have tried liquid nitrogen based cryo? Only maybe 10% of you. Here’s the deal. Cold showers, good. Sitting in an ice bath will get your peripheral, your skin receptors, and your core cold receptors and that is uncomfortable. This only gets the peripheral cold receptors. It’s kind of like you’re in a sweaty hot place, and you walk outside and there’s a blizzard, and you’re wearing shorts, but you’re only walking to your car that’s already warmed up. No big deal. You just walk through cold air. How can you do that? Because if a swimming pool was that cold you’d be frozen solid? Because air isn’t a good conductor.

 

What you’re doing is your telling about the outer few millimeters of your skin, oh my god, it’s an ice age, you’re going to die. The rest of your body is like ha ha. That part of your nervous system is like, okay, get ready. Activate brown fat, grow more brown fat, burn white fat burn hundreds more calories, turn off inflammation, sleep better. Heal faster. All of those things happen in we’re talking up to 3 minutes of time. Plus another maybe 1 minute to take your clothes off except your underwear, and if you have lots of piercings you have to take those out too. If there’s any metal on your body below your neck, the metal will absorb cold much more quickly than your skin, and then the metal will become so cold that it will actually brand you, so that’s a bit of a problem.

 

You basically go in there wearing underwear, socks, and gloves, and you just chill. Then you’re done. In terms of benefit, per minute spent, it is such an amazing technology, I’ve never found anything else like it for changing your inflammation levels, and for burning fat. It’s pretty interesting. The other thing that this kind of cold does is, it triggers collagen synthesis, so if you’re eating collagen, say I’ve created collagen in your coffee, and you’re telling your skin make new collagen really quickly, you can see some pretty fast changes in it which is a remarkable thing. I’m very fortunate to have one of these at Bulletproof labs, it’s part of the research that I do. As you guys know, I work to make all of the unusual technologies that I’m working on much, much more accessible.

 

On one of the days here we had cryo available. I couldn’t get the trailer that did it for all the days. My goal is to get everyone here to give it a try. Maybe next year we can do that. Make this something where you’re like, “why am I going out to places that are supposed to be helping me, like my doctor’s office, why is there not a cryotherapy in the front where they make me wait for a half hour, I could have totally taken my clothes off, frozen my ass off, put them back on, and then I wouldn’t have had to see the doctor?”

 

But these are questions we should be asking ourselves, and questions that our healthcare providers should be asking ourselves. Things like our schools, yes, Alan and Ana do cryotherapy. They’re 5 and 6 years old, and they know it makes them ripped.

 

I also, thanks Jackee for being our model, Jackee’s our podcast producer for Bulletproof Radio. See those wires coming off of her, and see that look of glee as I’m making her scream? What we do here is electrical stimulation. What I did is I basically was like, this is what it feels like when you turn on which is why you get that look, and then I helped her do squats. Here. What’s going on is we’re causing her quads and her glutes to contract, in this case about 250 times a second while she does a motion. You can not do this motion 250 times a second, even if you’re like a real stud. How do you get such rapid progress, and what happens? What happens is you get neurological development as well as muscle development and oxygenation. I believe if you’re going to do a movement, and you do that movement with the right electoral current over it, you’ll always get more results from doing it with the electoral current.

 

Whether you’re training speed, or training strength you can do that. There’s some things that you want to do without electricity like ARX or some of the other technologies that are out there. Let’s talk about ARX, the next one.

 

In fact, here’s Andy Hnilo from Alitura, Andy’s out here, and I’ve helped Andy start his company, he’s the guy who has the incredible hulk face mask. Alitura mask. I use that stuff. It basically pulls a lot of toxins out of your face. You can see it change when you use it even one time, and I just come out with some other really cool stuff.

 

He came up to Bulletproof labs. He’s also a cover model for Oakley, which is why he looks like that. I just want to say, I am 10 years older than Andy, but on the ARX machine here, on a quantitative basis, I did bench press more than him.

 

Truth be told before that I ran electoral current over him and had him do push ups on the Bulletproof Vibe, so I cheated, but still, it was funny. Andy’s a total stud.

 

What this machine does, and there are 2 ARX machines out here that you should try in the tech hall, it’s basically the idea that if you’re going to pick up heavy stuff, the way we’ve always done it, the way our cave men ancestors, the ones that we are making extinct, the way they would do it is pick up heavy, nothing wrong with doing that. But when you pick up something heavy, like, okay, at this point, how much can you lift. At this point how much can you lift, and at this point how much can you lift? They’re different numbers.

 

The first company to try and solve this problem was actually Nautilus. If you’re as old as I am, you remember. They used to have these machines with round gears on them. Then nautilus had an elliptical gear so you’d have more weight on the muscle at the parts where you were stronger. The problem is that if you’re doing a bench press and you’re all the way back here, and you have almost no strength, how do you make maximum contractions here, and also maximum contractions here?

 

Well, it’s really, really difficult to solve that problem. What you do there is, you use a computer so you’re looking at how much pressure you’re putting using your brain to do that, but you’re also using a wench to move the force so there is no gravity involved in the system, your body feels there’s no gravity. There’s no risk of letting go of something and hurting yourself or causing damage. The propreate receptors in your arms, and all of your joints don’t fire to defend you the same way.

 

What you end up doing is this incredibly hard thing, and I’m serious, everyone should try this, and when you do this, you’re like, oh my God, how did this happen. But what you did was, you had a hundred percent effort throughout the entire power curve which you could never do before this, and that causes rapid muscle adaptation, like much faster than you would get from doing heavy weights.

 

Did I just say more benefit in less time? Yes. Are there places on earth where gravity doesn’t really play a role in the way things work normally? No. If you’re picking up logs in the forest, yes, you can get strong that way but what we’re doing is we’re intentionally using technology to take gravity out of the equation so the force you’re fighting against is not gravity and it’s linear and it’s always maximum.

 

When you do that, your body gets a signal that’s stronger than Mother Nature can provide. The same way that cryo provides a cold stronger than mother nature can provide. It’s that ability to manipulate your environment that allows us to get more changes in less time.

 

I don’t have a slide for it, but I have also a bio density machine which you can see at the front of the exhibit hall. Bio density also uses a computer to show you your force, but your pushing at something that doesn’t move. What you’re doing with bio density is you’re creating bone flection. You’re actually bending your bones, and you can see it happen, and it’s kind of creepy because you feel like your bones shouldn’t bend.

 

Why would you ever train your bones? Well, bone density is kind of important for all sorts of things, but the way we normally train our bones is, we jump, we move, we have impact. Impact is good. But impact is fleeting. You have lots of impact, your knees probably aren’t going to like that, like long distance runners. That’s a bit of a conundrum. It turns out by flexing he bone you’re causing a piseo electro effect in the bone. Pieso electricity basically means that when you move something it generates electricity, and your bones generate a micro current.

 

This has all been proven, I think Robert Back wrote about that a long time ago, in the 80’s or 90’s. If you’re pushing really hard on something, enough to bend the bone at the right angle, the bone will actually get stronger. The reason that I became interested in the bio density is that if you’re looking to make stronger bones, if you do normal exercise, 1% improvement in HBA1C, this is your blood marker for how well you process blood sugar. They measure it in diabetics, and in non diabetics to see how well we process carbs.

 

If you take medformin, the most common diabetes drug, you get another 1% improvement in this marker. Or 10 minutes once a week you flex your bones a bit on the bio density, and you get an 8.2% improvement. 10 minutes once a week, no drugs required, all you need is access to one of these machines. Should this be at your doctor’s office? Yeah, it should be at your doctor’s office. Or at your gym. Or somewhere where you can do this. So why do I talk about this stuff with all of you? You should know that you can beat drugs and exercise together by 4 times in 10 minutes once a week. The fact that everyone doesn’t know this kind of pisses me off.

 

That’s another picture of the air, I actually have an old ghetto looking prototype, the last one that they made. The ones here look like space age aliens or something. I also have a hyperbaric oxygen chamber, and we’ve talked about hyperbaric oxygen already, about some of the benefits, so I’m not going to dwell on that as much. I do that especially after I fly, or when I’m doing really intense brain training, I spend extra time doing that because you can do more, you can recover faster, you can grow your brain more.

 

Having the ability to also do something you’re unlikely to find in nature really unstable surface to train yourself to have a better vistibular function than you’re likely to have from even playing in the forest the way my friends at Move Net world recommend, and the way I also recommend. To be able to stand on a slack line, and find your sense of balance to make your eyes and your brain work really hard, and to be able to even do something like juggle, which I haven’t learned how to do yet, I can juggle a little bit, but on this thing I just fall off. Still working on that one.

 

Infrared sauna, you saw what it did for my sleep. I have a sunlight and infrared sauna which is a really amazing thing to do for detox. People who have had toxic mold, or Lyme, or if you’re tired after a long flight, something’s wrong, you sit in there. It has a built in little screen, you can watch Netflix while you’re in the sauna, you can do email, your laptop won’t overheat in 45 minutes, most likely. It gets a little hot. It’s probably not good for it, but your phone will definitely work. The point is, you’re not losing this time. You can also, this is big enough for 5 people, but Lana and I can go in the sauna together, and if we were going to sit on the couch and talk, we can sit in the sauna and talk. You’re not losing anything by doing something that also increases the calories you burn, makes you sweat, makes you detox. You can see a difference in your abs the next day.

 

There’s also the human cloning tank. This is actually a flotation tank. This is a sensory deprivation tank, and I had to put some stickers on there, and these are the ones that came to mind. My neighbors really think I’m weird. The other thing that makes them think I’m weird is that outside all of the lighting is red at night because I live in a forest, the only lights that I can see that are man made from my house are 3 red lights on a radio tower, even though I’m a half hour from the airport. I have owls, 2 different species, tons of night life, and lots and lots of bugs I can’t even identify. I didn’t see the need to mess with their circadian biology, so I have red lights that let me see just fine outside, but it looks like Count Dracula’s castle.

 

When they come in, they see that, they’re like, oh my God, he’s going to eat me. But the effects of doing this, this type of flotation are pretty profound, especially people with a lot of trauma. If you do this on a regular basis for every night for a month, you really feel like a nervous system reset that happens. A reset in the amygdala. Even your sensitivity to the world around you becomes smaller. It’s expensive to run one of these at home, it’s annoying to have to maintain it just like a hot tub, so I’m not sure that this is the thing that you really want to have at home. It’s the sort of thing that you want to go use somewhere. When I’m experimenting with this, plus I live on Vancouver Island, so it’s not like there’s one of these next door. There are some about 45 minutes, Float Labs, in Victoria, actually, help me set this up. It’s really neat to be able to put the kids in there, and play with it.

 

Alan, my son, when he was 5 had his first float. It was really neat. He was a little afraid, and we didn’t close the lid, he was just laying in about 8 or 9 inches in Epsom salt soaked water. You’re floating on top of it, you can’t sink. You have the lights on or off, your choice, and I got him to flip the lid open, just lay down and relax. I said, okay, Alan, when he got out, rinse off, I said you did a great job, that was your first time floating, you rocked that, you did so well. He goes, “Daddy, that wasn’t my first time floating.” I’m like, oh really? I’m pretty sure I know. He goes, nope, I floated for 80 hours when I was inside mommy’s tummy.

 

You notice this is kind of a round thing that’s dark and full of warm water, like might trigger a few memories of the womb, right? Did we talk about how your nervous system gets set, and gets programmed? Yeah, it does get programmed. It gets programmed when you’re in the womb, it gets programmed when you’re very, very young. He picked up on that right away because when you’re little you still are connected with that more than when adults are. When you throw an adult in there, it is a womb like experience, and it causes your nervous system to act a little bit more flexibly. It’s a pretty neat technology.

 

The final thing that’s here is neurofeedback. It’s kind of hard to tell what’s going on here. I have an 8 channel amplifier, or distributor anyway. An electro box on my chest, and electrodes glued all in my hair which is why I look so dorky. The ability to monitor my brain, and to train my brain, both at Bulletproof Labs, and at other places, has been really transformative for me. You can get a simple thing like Mews for $200, $300. You can get systems like the Neuroptimal that I carry on Bulletproof Labs, that costs about $18/session. The lowest, effective safe one I could find. Most cost effective safe one I could find after a lot of research. Then you can go to therapists who use it, you can go to things like 40 years of Zen, which is still one of our prizes.

 

Any of these options can have profound effects, but these are things that I do at Bulletproof labs at home. This is not a call to all of you to go out and build a crazy bio hacking lab unless that’s your calling. What I’m saying is that these are technologies that radically changed my life and human performance, and I am actively upset that neurofeedback isn’t at every school because if you want to teach kids to learn, maybe you could teach them to just regulate their own brains a little bit so that they can pay attention better. That kind of thing is worth so much more than memorizing the capital of every state.

 

By the way, I don’t know the capital of every state. I actually just don’t care. Does that make me a bad person, I don’t know.

 

Thank you guys.

 

Come to the Bulletproof Conference to listen and learn and play. It’s the immerse experience of the Bulletproof Conference that sets it apart. You actually get to touch the toys. You get to feel these things. You get to actually change your biology while you’re there, and of course you get to learn from the world’s top experts, but more importantly you get to play. I want as many people as possible to be able to learn and experience and play. This is actually fun. It’s not a boring conference. It’s an amazing chance to hang out with the right people, and also to do all those things that you read about, or that you heard me talk about, or things that are in Bulletproof Labs. You get to play. I feel a responsibility to bring this kind of experience to as many people as possible, and that’s why we’re growing the conference.

 

Dave:  I promise you, you’re going to have a good time.

 

You’ll learn about what high performance humans actually do in their daily lives. We’re going to focus a lot on brain performance, and even some of the medical aspects of that. You’ll learn about relationships, and how you can change your relationships to change how you perform, and how you feel every single day. Even to change the neurochemicals in your mind. And you’ll learn about affagenetics, which is the study of how you can change the environment around you so that it changes your genes for you, putting you firmly in the drivers seat. We’ll have the full retail store with discounts where you can get everything that you would expect to get at the Bulletproof Coffee Shop. You will also learn more about life, and flow states. Meditation. Training your memory. Gratitude. And the list goes on and on.

 

There will even be specific speaker breakouts and hands on workshops. You can actually get time with the people who speak at the conference. The Bulletproof Conference speakers are going to speak on topics that are really, really cutting edge. This is the stuff that I live and breathe, the things that have made the biggest difference in my own life. I want to bring those to you, and share them with you, and let you talk to the guy next to you, talk to the woman on the other side of you, and sit down and say, you know what, I just made new friends, and I made new friends doing some of the most impressive, most fun, most amazing things I’ve done in my entire life. That’s what the Bulletproof Conference is all about. Please join me there, I’ll look forward to hanging out with you.

[/expand]

Diving into the Fountain of Youth with Aubrey de Grey – #326

Why You Should Listen –

Dr. Aubrey de Grey is a biomedical gerontologist based in Cambridge, UK and Mountain View, California, USA. He is the Chief Science Officer of SENS Research Foundation, a California-based biomedical research charity that performs and funds laboratory research dedicated to combating the aging process. He is also Editor-in-Chief of Rejuvenation Research, the world’s highest-impact peer-reviewed journal focused on intervention in aging. On today’s episode of Bulletproof Radio, Dave and Aubrey talk about the seven things that cause aging, morbidity, the ethics of immortality, fighting cancer, aging goals for the immediate future and more. Enjoy the show!

Watch

Listen

Follow Along with the Transcript!

[expand title=”CLICK HERE to read along with the transcript!” swaptitle=”Click to hide transcript”]

Click here to download a PDF of this transcript

Speaker 1:      Bulletproof Radio, a state of high performance.

 

Dave Asprey: You’re listening to Bulletproof Radio with Dave Asprey. Today’s cool fact of the day is that getting older may be the key to happiness. A recent study at the University of Chicago found that happiness increases incrementally from 65- 80 years old, and some studies show that people are happier in their eighties than they were in their twenties. The scientists who do these studies believe that our toolbox of social, and emotional instincts that are built on experience, are the key to being happy later in life, which is a cool perspective on it. If you’re twenty, and miserable, just think, it won’t suck nearly as bad when you’re eighty. I’ll tell you when I’m eighty, all right?

 

Before we get into the show, if you’re not familiar with Bulletproof Upgraded Aging Formula, you should check this stuff out. This has quietly become one of our most popular supplements, because it really, really works. It works on some of the problems with aging- particularly in the brain via four different pathways- including things that optimize your daily brain function. It regulates genetic expression similar to the way fasting does, which is really, really cool. If you want to live longer, one thing you can do is fast regularly. You can also take things that mimic the genetic changes. It also protects neurons in the brain from excessive glutamate, and it helps people to maintain healthy blood sugar levels. All those things happen to you as you age. It’s one of my favorite supplements, and something that works on those mitochondrial pathways. It primes the mitochondrial pump, in that it’s the last step in energy production in the Kreb cycle right before additional keytones, or additional sugar enter the cycle. It’s a very interesting supplement, and one that I value. It’s called Bulletproof Upgraded Aging Formula.

 

Now, today’s guest is a friend; a guy I first met six, or seven years ago over breakfast. I think we had some omelettes in Mountain View, California, and this is none other than Aubrey de Grey. He is probably the most famous anti-aging guy out there. A Biomedical Gerontologist focused on regenerative medicine. He’s the editor-in-chief of Rejuvination Research, and a fellow of the Gerentological Society of America, the American Aging Association, and the Institute for Ethics, and Emerging Technologies; definitely qualifies as a biohacker by any measure, and the owner of the single coolest beard I’ve ever seen. Aubrey, welcome to the show.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Thank you very much. It’s great to be here.

 

Dave Asprey: Your work on aging has been some of the most seminal work out there, where you talked about these five big causes of aging, and what we could potentially do about them. What’s your definition of aging, today, for listeners?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        First of all, let me correct you, it’s actually seven causes.

 

Dave Asprey: Seven? Forgetfulness was one of those things. I have a …

 

Aubrey de Grey:        What’s the definition of aging? It’s actually a really simple definition. Aging is simply the accumulation of damage in the body that occurred; is created as a side effect, or the consequence of the body’s normal operation. The reason I like that definition is not just that it’s mechanistic, but also that it emphasizes that aging is not really a phenomenon of biology. It’s a phenomenon of physics. It’s something that happens to any machine with moving parts, irrespective of whether that machine is alive. It demystifies aging. Aging is not a mystery. Aging is a simple thing. It’s just the same in the human body- in essence- as it is in a car, or an airplane.

 

Dave Asprey: I absolutely love that definition, but you said something. You said, “In the normal course of living.” What about damage that comes from things that are abnormal?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Of course, the real question is- it’s a very important question- which of those two actually contributes more to the rate at which damage accumulates. Many people would like to believe that we can very substantially reduce the rate at which damage accumulates by doing a particular thing in terms of lifestyle, whether it’s yoga, or meditation, or supplements, or exercise, or more sex, or less sex, or whatever. Unfortunately, the evidence seems to be that these things only play a relatively minor role when compared to the things that we all have to do. The single biggest problem; the single thing that drives the greatest amount of accumulation of damage is breathing. Breathing is not negotiable, really. The next one is probably the transport of sugar. Of course, that controls things like diabetes, and so on. Again, you’ve got to have sugar. You can have less sugar, or more sugar, but you’re still going to have a certain amount, and your blood sugar levels are going to fluctuate a certain amount, and you’re going to have the consequences of that.

 

This is the kind of reason why we’ve decided to sidestep this question entirely, and not focus on which are the major contributors to the creation of damage, but rather intervene one step later down the road, and try to repair that damage after it’s been created so that it doesn’t really matter where it came from.

 

Dave Asprey: That is an incredibly elegant answer that says, “I don’t care where it comes from, let’s just fix it, and help the body repair itself.” If you’re looking at maintaining your race car, or let’s just say, your commuting car, you can change your oil, and do your careful servicing intervals, and drive it carefully, and put the brakes on slowly. It’ll go an extra fifty-thousand miles, or you could just replace the engine when it goes out, right?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I wouldn’t quite like to say that it’s an either/or.

 

Dave Asprey: Yes.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I think that preventive maintenance comes in many forms even for a relatively simple machine like a car, but we certainly do see, of course, by the existence of cars that are more than a hundred years old, that with sufficient work; with sufficiently comprehensive preventative maintenance, the healthy longevity of the machine can be extended arbitrarily long. These cars, obviously, they were not designed to last a hundred years. They were designed to last maybe ten, or fifteen years.

 

Dave Asprey: We share that perspective, and I probably am a little more biased towards, “Well, let me see what I can do to extend the useful service life before I need to replace parts.”

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Before you go on, don’t get me wrong, I absolutely think that lifestyle optimization is a good thing, simply because if apart from anything else, we just don’t have these therapies, yet.

 

Dave Asprey: We’re in full agreement on that one. I’d rather just eat cake all the time, and just replace bad mitochondria that come as a result of that. I just don’t know how yet, so I’m not going to eat the cake. Right? Okay.

 

Let’s talk about those seven things, because that is- and, I say this having run the Silicon Valley Health Institute. You came, and spoke there many years ago. In fact, that was where I first met you now that I think about it, before we had breakfast, but I look at what impact that’s had on the world; that perspective, and I think it’s been very far-reaching in the American Academy of Anti-Age Medicine. Walk me through the seven things that are happening that are messing us up.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        First of all, I want to start that answer by emphasizing that there are actually far more than seven things. There are many, many, many things. The seven comes from the classification of those things. First of all, I want to describe what the motivation for having a classification at all is. Motivation is to simplify the development of the specification of the fixes. The idea of this classification is that for each of the categories, there is one generic approach to repair of that type of damage. It’s something that may be differing in details from one example within the category, but only in the details. If we go through the categories, then the first one is, loss of cells. Simply, cells dying, and not being automatically replaced by the division of other cells. That sounds like a very broad category, and it is, but the fact is, it’s got a generic fix, and you all know what that fix is; it’s stem-cell therapy; putting cells in that will be able to divide, and differentiate to replace the cells that the body is not replacing on it’s own.

 

Dave Asprey: Have you had stem-cells?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Oh, certainly not yet. Most stem-cell therapies are at a relatively early stage of development at this point, and moreover, I’m only 53, and I’m doing pretty well. I’m not in danger of needing that kind of thing, yet.

 

Dave Asprey: Have you banked your stem-cells?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Okay, let me finish the first answer.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay, got it, sorry.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        It’s important to understand that there’s always a trade-off between doing preventative maintenance early, and doing it later, but still early enough, and benefiting in the latter case from the fact that the therapies have been improved in their comprehensiveness; their quality, or whatever. At the moment, I believe that I’m on that side of the curve; that I should not, because I’m doing pretty well for my age to be actually engaging in these therapies, yet.

 

The separate question you asked about banking your stem-cells is a very interesting one. Of course, the idea of banking is that our stem-cells deteriorate over time, and that therefore, if we were to try to do some kind of autologous stem-cell therapy; in other words, therapy that involves taking our own cells, and manipulating them in some way, and then putting them back, then we wouldn’t have starting cells to work from that were as good as the ones that we might have had at an earlier age; but, we’ve got a couple of reasons why that has become less important, especially in regards to treatments for things about aging.

 

The main reason is the development of induced pluripotent stem cells. The idea here, of course, is that we can now take cells that are not even stem cells at all, let alone primitive stem cells, and we can de-differentiate them back into a much more primitive state; and then, we differentiate them back out into whatever kind of state we would like so that they will be programmed into the appropriate form. They will then be our own, so they will not immunorejection, or anything like that, but they will also be in a state that might not exist, or at least to very high frequency, in the body before we start. Yet, we still have them without having had to bank them.

 

Dave Asprey: I am so intrigued at that line of things. I have done some cell therapy. I’m going to talk about it my conference. I just did a whole bunch of it, but I’m looking to only be thirty for the rest of my life, so we’ll see how well that works.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        [Laughs]

 

Dave Asprey: I’m not thirty, I’m forty-three.

 

I’m really intrigued at your comments though on where it will be in ten years. I have no idea, and hopefully what I’m doing now is beneficial, and not damaging. It is a coin toss. I totally acknowledge that. Cell loss; we can deal with that with stem cells, and what was next on your list of seven?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I can deal with the next two jointly, because they’re both the opposite of cell loss; having to many cells rather than too few. The reason there is two categories is because there are two different ways in which we end up having too many cells, and depending on which way, the therapy is different. It could lead back again to the reason for the classification. One way is, cells dividing when they’re not supposed to, and that of course is, more or less, the definition of cancer. People have had plenty of ideas about how to deal with cancer, and I think they’re going pretty well at the moment, I guess, especially over the past few years, there’s been huge breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, which are looking very promising. We, at SENS Research Foundation are pursuing a rather more ambitious, and rather more innovative approach that involves controlling the ability of cells to extend their telomeres; the ends of the chromosomes.

 

This is not a new idea exactly. It’s something that has been pursued by other groups, especially by a company named, Jaron, but we are proposing to do it in a much more comprehensive, and hard-hitting kind of way, which we believe is necessary in order to really defeat cancer. It’s very elaborate, the approach that we’re taking, and we hope to goodness that we’re not actually going to need to do it, because something else that’s simpler will work well enough; but, we’re not betting on that, and that’s why we are pursuing this very much more aggressive approach.

 

The second type of way in which you can have too many cells is when, instead of cells dividing when they’re not supposed to, they don’t die when they are supposed. That’s a little more counter intuitive. Most people don’t think in terms of cells being supposed to die in any circumstance, but actually there are circumstances in the body where that is the case. The most important one; the most high profile one, so to speak, is the immune system, where you get an infection, have a very tiny proportion of our white blood cells expand like crazy; they divide like crazy for a while in order to be populous enough to eliminate the infection, and when the infection is eliminated, they almost all die, and just a small residual population of what are called, “Memory cells” remain, so as to be able to respond much more rapidly if you get the same infection again; and, that’s all very nice.

 

Unfortunately, there are certain infections that hang around in the body, rather than being completely eliminated, they become latent, and they re-activate every so often. When that happens, you get the rather unfortunate cycling of the same cells expanding, and dying, and expanding, and dying. Eventually, probably for anti-cancer reasons, the cells stop refusing to go through that cycle. The problem is that they refuse at the expanded end. In other words, you end up with cells that should be responding to signals telling them to die, and they no longer do respond, so you have too many of them, and that inhibits the ability of other cells to divide to respond to new infections. That’s an example of where we need to get rid of cells. There are other examples of what I call, “Death resistant cells,” and the way to get rid of these things … There are various people around, and it’s quite high profile now; trying to use small molecules from a pharmacological approaches to kill these cells. There are some tentatively promising results. I’m certainly following that work very closely.

 

We’re not sure that that’s going to pan out to a sufficient extent to really solve the problem, and so we’re pursuing a rather more rationally-designed, shall we say, involving genetics; involving suicide gene therapy. There’s something that’s a relatively routine tool in the lab, but it’s not really yet used in the clinic. It’s called suicide gene therapy, and what that is, is you use engineered viruses, just like in any other gene therapy, to deliver DNA to cells, but weirdly, what you deliver is a gene that kills the cells. The reason that this makes sense is because you arrange so that they will not be expressed; the protein that’s toxic will not be constructed, unless the cell gets into a particular state where you want it to die. This is a way of essentially overriding the death resistance of these cells.

 

Dave Asprey: Are they death resistant to high amounts of oxidative stress?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        They are resistant to that. Most are resistant to that; fairly resistant anyway. The real problem is that these cells are resistant to signaling; to actually the signals that would normally get them to turn on a cell suicide process of their own. It no longer works.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        That’s three types of damage so far.

 

Dave Asprey: Three, right.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        The three I’ve mentioned so far are all about cell number; having too few, or too many. The rest is at the molecular level, rather than the cellular level. Two of the remaining four are inside the cell. The first one is mitochondrial mutation. The mitochondria, of course- as they call the power plant of the cell, the place that does the chemistry of breathing. The mitochondria have their own DNA, which they are the only part of the cell that does that’s outside the nucleus. That DNA, for various reasons, accumulates mutations much faster; far faster than the nuclear DNA. It’s generally believed; there’s plenty of- albeit somewhat circumstantial evidence- and, we don’t really know the mechanism, yet, but there’s plenty of good evidence that the accumulation of mitochondrial mutation contributes to various aspects of aging. We’d like to fix that.

 

There are various approaches that people have proposed, but nothing’s really panned out. Again, we’re taking a very aggressive approach that’s difficult to implement. If we can, then it would really solve the problem. In this case, that approach is what is called allotopic expression. What that means is we take a copies of the mitochondrial DNA, and we modify them, and we put them into the nuclear DNA. We’re using gene therapy, again. The idea here is that if we implement the correct modification, then those genes will express proteins that will be imported back into the mitochondria even those the genes are in the nucleus. The reason that’s not completely out of the realm of plausibility, is that mitochondria already do this, naturally, with 99% of their proteins. There’s only thirteen proteins that the mitochondrial DNA. The idea is simply to co-opt the same mechanism that already exists for these thousand, or more other proteins. It’s going well. This is an idea that’s been going around for thirty odd years, and progress has been rather fitful. We’re a lot closer to getting it to work than anyone else has ever been. We’ve still got a little way to go, though.

 

Dave Asprey: Are you a little concerned about those extra proteins made by nuclear DNA floating around in the cytoplasm, because there’s too many of them for the mitochondria to use?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Sometimes, it’s important to implement some kind of copy control of these things in any kind of genetic therapy. However, in general that turns out to be not much of a problem, because the cell already has really good ways of implementing copy control itself, or getting rid of superfluous proteins automatically. We don’t have to worry about that too much.

 

Dave Asprey: Cool.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        All right. The other type of damage inside the cell is much simpler to describe; it’s just waste products. The cell constantly makes stuff that it doesn’t actually use as side product of things that it does need, and in general, those things are eliminated either by being destroyed, or by being excreted, so that’s all great. Unfortunately, some things that are by products that are very slowly accumulating; the relatively rare by products. Those things; simply, the body doesn’t care. Evolution doesn’t care about these things, because even if they’re not destroyed, or excreted, they still don’t accumulate to a sufficient amount to cause problems until old age, and as we all know, evolution doesn’t care about old people. It only cares about people in terms of their reproduction.

 

We need to get rid of these various types of waste product that cause things like atherosclerosis, and macular degeneration. The way that we’ve approached that problem is by stealing some technology from an area of biology that isn’t even biomedical. An area called bioremediation, which is used for environmental decontamination. Basically, what happens is that we find bacteria in the soil that are able to destroy a particular target compound, and then in bioremediation, what happens is they just grow a lot of those bacteria, and shuck them into the environment, and the environment is de-contaminated. In our case, we don’t want to do that. What we do instead is we identify the genes that these bacteria have that give them the ability to break down the target compound. Then, we incorporate those genes modification so that they still work into human cells, so that those cells are able to destroy the stuff that’s accumulating.

 

For example, one thing we published a few years ago is that we could identify a gene that we could put into white blood cells, and those cells would then be able to break down oxidized cholesterol. Normal cholesterol is a perfectly essential molecule, and we’d better not destroy it too much, and that’s why statins are not a very good drug against atherosclerosis. They work by reducing the amount of cholesterol that we make, but the real enemy in atherosclerosis is oxidized cholesterol, so if we can directly eliminate that, rather than going after the normal cholesterol, we’ve got a much better chance; and, that’s what we have shown- only at proof of concept level so far, but still- that might be possible to do.

 

All right, so I’ve got two types of damage left, and they are both molecular again, but in this case, rather than being inside the cell, they are outside the cell. They are in the spaces between cells. The first one is, again, waste products. They accumulate outside the cell, too. The reason why it’s a separate category is the usual reason, namely, that we’re going to go after it in a different way than inside the cell. Molecular waste products inside the cell. What we’ll do in this case is we actually only need to re-locate the stuff.

 

Outside the cell, the natural machinery that exists for getting rid of stuff; for breaking it down, and so on, is very primitive; very much more restricted, and less powerful than anything that exists inside the cell, which means that stuff accumulates there- outside the cell- which would not accumulate- it would be naturally destroyed if it were just inside the cell. All we have to do is make that happen, and it turns out that that’s not so hard. You can vaccinate against stuff that you want to get rid of, and the immune system will engulf. It will get it inside the cell, and after that, it’s pretty much toast. That’s actually a very promising approach, and indeed in the late nineties, it was first demonstrated to work in the cases of one particular type of extra cellular garbage; namely the amyloid that we see in Alzheimer’s in the brain. It was demonstrated in mice, and that went through to clinical trials, and it’s been shown it really works. It doesn’t give much in the way of cognitive benefit; at least not to most patients, but that’s simply because the amyloid is only one component of Alzheimer’s disease. You need additional therapies, too, that have not developed.

 

It looks like it works. We’ve been pursuing the same idea in the context of other types of garbage; also types of amyloid, but made of different types of protein, and occurring in different parts of the body. We’ve specifically been going after something called, transfer amyloid, which accumulates in the heart, among other places, and causes a disease called senile cardiac amyloidosis. That’s a disease that has come very strongly to the attention of gerontologists recently, because it’s been determined that this disease is responsible for a huge proportion- maybe as much as half- of the death of really, really old people; people over 105, 110. We definitely need to fix that. We have duly indeed been able to develop antibodies that seem to work, and we are hoping that these are going to go through the usual process, and become therapy.

 

The final type of damage is not waste products, but rather a change in the structure of something in the space between cells. There’s this lattice of proteins called the extracellular matrix, which holds our cells together, and gives our tissues their physical properties; their elasticity, especially. Elasticity is really important in certain places in the body, such as the major arteries. The main reason why we get high blood pressure in old age is because our major arteries get stiffer. They get less elastic, and that results in the need to push the blood harder, and it results in damage to the more fragile minor components of the circulatory system.

 

What we’d like to do is restore that elasticity, and that sounds like it shouldn’t be too hard, because we have a good understanding at this point at the molecular level. We understand that it’s mainly caused by the reaction of amino acids in the extracellular matrix with sugar in the circulation; and, sometimes, those reactions cause new chemical bonds to be laid down that link between the proteins that make up the extracellular matrix. That’s what, essentially, causes the stiffening that we see; the loss of elasticity. If we could have drugs that would break those unwanted cross links, then we’d be golden. It turns out that the structure of these cross links- the molecular nature of them- is very different from anything that the body lays down on purpose. That means that in principal, a small molecule that attracts these things- even if it’s not particularly specific- it will be specific enough not to have particular side effects, and that’s the kind of thing we’re looking for right now.

 

Dave Asprey: Now, you said amino acids. I’m mostly familiar with advanced glycation end-products.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        That’s what I’m talking about.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay, cool. Those, though, require relatively high levels of glucose, so is it an amino acid problem, or is it a sugar problem? Are there specific amino acids that you’re more worried about than others?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        First of all, yes there are certainly specific amino acids. The links that we’re talking about only form between lycene, and argenine, but the amount of those amino acids in the extracellular matrix is non-negotiable, because they are one of the proteins that are involved in actually constructing extracellular matrix are what they are. You’re not going to be able to change those. You can, of course, change the other side of the equation, as you mentioned, the level of sugar; but, what’s really important to understand is you can’t change it all that much. If we have too little glucose; too little sugar in the circulation, that’s hypoglecmia, and it’s bad for you. We can’t change it all that much.

 

One thing we can change is the amount of fluctuation in the amount of sugar we have. Certainly, the big problem with insulin resistance, and Type II diabetes is exactly that; that our system for regulating sugar, and getting rid of those spikes after eating as quickly as possible, that machinery starts to work progressively less well. However, the point is that even in early life; even when there is perfect glycemic control, you’ve still got a respectable amount of sugar in the circulation, because you need it, and so glycation is going to happen; and, advanced glycation end-products, including these cross links I’m talking about, are going to accumulate.

 

Dave Asprey: There are lifestyle factors in that one that seem to have a pretty big … Alcohol, when it breaks down in the liver aldehydes; giant cross link forming things. If someone drinks less, they’re going to have less of this stuff until these small molecules come out that can break down the links. That seems like a pretty valid way of preventing one of the seven problems.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Again, it’s a matter of the contribution of these different mechanisms. Yes, certain types of components, depending on the specifics of how good your enzymes of particular types are- certain ones may make a difference to the level of certain drivers of glycation in the circulation. If you are, for example, particularly poorly equipped to eliminate alcohol from your bloodstream, so that you have aldehydes, especially, in the circulation, because you have good alcohol dehydrogenates, but you don’t have good aldehyde dehydrogenates, then not only will you be prone to getting hangovers, you’ll also be prone to also having somewhat accelerated accumulation of glycation end-products. As I say, we’ve got to always have a sense of proportion about this, and understand that the essential amount of glucose that you have in the circulation is actually the major contributor to the accumulation.

 

Dave Asprey: Sugar, and oxygen are toxic, unquestionably, and we use them every day, so let’s repair that. I’m in full agreement on that one.

 

Are there things we can do now that turn up our body’s natural mechanisms for repairing these types of damage?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        There doesn’t seem to be all that much that we can do now. Certain things we know we can do that are the wrong things to do. We know that smoking is bad for you. We know that getting seriously overweight is bad for you. Probably, meditation is good for you, insofar as it reduces stress hormones like cortisol, and those things definitely contribute to the rate of accumulation of various types of damage. Everything I’m saying here is what your mother told you. The question you’re really asking is, “Is there any new news? Is there any big discovery that helps us to do things that we couldn’t do before?” The answer is, no, there is not. At the moment, the best thing that you can do to have a higher probability of living a longer amount of time in a healthy state is a very boring thing. It is, give me large amounts of money so that we can get this research done faster, and develop medicines.

 

Dave Asprey: Do you hear that everyone? Send your money to Aubrey. No joke, if you are in a position to make non profit donations, and you like this aggressive hacking of aging, Aubrey is the man. Seriously, SENS Foundation is worthy of your support.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        It sounds like a joke, but-

 

Dave Asprey: No, it’s not.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        It’s the actual truth.

 

Dave Asprey: Anyone who has listened to this much of the interview understands; I think the technical term is, “You know your shit.” I don’t know another way to put it.

 

Dave Asprey: Let’s talk about cancer. I’ve been talking with Dominic D’Agostino, looking at the mitochondrial parts of cancer. I’m working on a book on mitochondria right now; not a cancer specific book. We’re seeing huge changes when you use hyperbaric oxygen, and you change the mitochondrial biogenesis, and all these crazy things. What’s your take on cancer? It seems like one of those things that’s bad for aging. Give me Aubrey de Grey cancer story.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Okay, so first of all, I think that the appropriate way to classify cancer is to say that it is part of aging. It’s a part of aging that is essentially antagnostic to the rest of aging in the sense that it is a phenomenon of excessive regeneration, if you like, of too much cell division whereas many other parts of aging are alleviated by more cell division; by more stem-cells, things like that. A lot of the way that the body allows us to live as long as we do is, because of finding a good trade off between those two things; perhaps, dampening down our ability to have good regeneration, especially late in life, as a way of also dampening down the ability of cancer cells to divide rapidly, and kill us that way instead.

 

Then, I guess the real question is- I suppose it’s in two parts- there are various theories about how we might prevent cancer from getting going, things like that. Then, there are various theories about how we might eliminate cancer, or control cancer after it’s got going; after it’s been diagnosed, and so on. We at SENS Research Foundation as with all the other aspects of age related ill health, we tend to be focused on the latter; on rejuvenation, and repair. Our approach to combating cancer is a little bit off the beaten track of most of what we do. Rather than simple repair- simple restoration of the structure of how the body was at an earlier age- we want instead to effectively put a time bomb into cells to eliminate their ability to divide indefinitely by eliminating the genetic capacity that they have to extend the ends of their chromosomes.

 

The idea here is based on a discovery made way back in the early 1970’s, or rather an insight that was made, which is that the way in which DNA replicates is, it’s only been evolved once, or DNA polymerases have a lot in common; and, it works in a way that is unable to replicate the ends of a linear DNA molecule completely. Whenever a cell divides, it’s DNA is replicated, and the ends of the chromosome get shorter, and that can’t go on indefinitely. Eventually, things start going wrong. Of course, the obvious thing is, you eventually start losing important genetic information. Actually, things go wrong much sooner than that. They go wrong when you’ve just lost a little bit of DNA, because that impedes the ability of the cell to recognize the difference between- on the one hand, the end of the chromosome, and on the other hand, a broken chromosome, which happens all the time. Chromosomes have to be repaired after being broken constantly, and it’d be very bad if that same machinery recognized the ends of two chromosomes, and thought they were a broken chromosome, and joined them together, end to end. That’s why the special sequence, called telomeres exists at the end of the chromosome.

 

We are interested in insuring that cells in cancer can’t do what I just said; can’t extend the ends of the chromosomes, and maintain their telomeres. If they can’t, then eventually after dividing quite a bit- but, way before the cancer has grown big enough to kill us- then the things like joining chromosomes end to end will start happening, and the cells will just divide themselves into oblivion. We’re trying to stop that from happening.

 

Dave Asprey: That’s such an elegant way of hacking the problem. I’m a computer science guy, and you look at how you disrupt systems, and that is very different than the typical thing you hear. I am still intrigued by looking at the mitochondrial affects of cancer, and I believe there’s probably some hacks you could do to your mitochondrial function, which ought to have profound anti-cancer effects, but-

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Oh yeah, people have been definitely pretty excited about for example, stimulating mitochondrial activity as a way to eliminate what’s called the Warburg effect- the deliberate suppression of mitochondrial activity in cancer- but, it’s not yet clear that that would be a really decisive therapy. The thing is, that cancers are awfully clever at figuring out how to evade what we do, and in order to really get rid of a cancer, you have to do something that’s so hard hitting that even the trillion cells in a clinically relevant cancer can’t find a way out of it.

 

If you look at the mitochondrial thing, for example, suppose you have some drug that stimulates mitochondrial function; if the cancer can figure out how to break down the drug, or to stop the drug from getting into the cell in the first place, or even just suppress mitochondrial activity harder so that the drug is essentially outrun. All of these things are possible.

 

Dave Asprey: Definitely cancer will fight back. I suspect that the final answer will be many different therapies all at once, rather than just one. Although, the one you’re talking about- if that works- that seems very decisive. I like that thought. That’s really cool.

 

What are the other things besides cancer that are really big threats to longevity? If you’re sitting down to do an analysis, what would you think about?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        The reason we have these seven categories is because they’re all big threats. All of these types of damage accumulate semi-independently of each other, and therefore, they are all controlled by selective pressure- by evolution- in the same way. They all have the same essential deadline; the ill health, and decline in performance, and death, the results. In other words- put it like this- they have different genes that are involved in combating them, and slowing down the rate at which they accumulate, which means of course that if you have different sets of genes combating different types of damage, and one particular set of genes for one type of damage is unnecessarily effective, so that the type of damage that it is protecting against would not kill us until we were age 500, whereas everything else is going to kill us at age 100. Then, the genes in question- the genes that are controlling that type of damage- will not be selected for. They will accumulate spontaneous mutations- I’m talking here in the germ line, not in the body- and, they will become- these will be mild mutations, so the genes will still be there, and they’ll still somewhat work, but they won’t work as well as they used to, and eventually they will work only just well enough to defend against that type of damage for 100 years; same as all the other types of damaged genes. That’s why all these seven types of damage are equally important.

 

Dave Asprey: I love the way your mind works. You also talk about something called, “Compression of morbidity,” which is kind of a technical term, but explain that for listeners. It’s a cool idea.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Okay, so first of all, I certainly don’t talk about it, because I don’t think it’s a cool idea.

 

Dave Asprey: Oh, okay, I do, so tell me all about it.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Let me tell you why it’s not a cool idea.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        First of all, let me tell you what it is. The concept of compression of morbidity, as a goal, for biomedical gerontology- for doing something about aging- is that we’ve got this lifespan, and the last end years of the lifespan is unhealthy. Of course, exactly what end is depends on how you define unhealthy; how severe your ill health has to be. Still, the idea is we have this certain amount of time. Way back in about 1980, a very prominent gerontologist said, “Okay, maybe the goal of gerontology needs to be to postpone the decline into ill health,” in other words, extend the healthy longevity, and then we will have less time in the unhealthy stage. Sounds great, but of course, that concept relies, first of all, in terms of its actual plausibility, on the idea that there is something that kills us on schedule irrespective of how long we’ve been unhealthy. That somehow, if you delay the onset of ill health, then the ill health will become more severe at a more rapid rate than it would if you didn’t delay it. There’s absolutely no reason whatsoever to think that that’s the case. If you can delay the beginning the of ill health, then it’s probably going to proceed at the normal rate.

 

Secondly, we have to ask ourselves, do we really want compression of morbidity? If you think about it, the ultimate limit of compressing mobility is that you live to 100 in the same kind of mental, and physical state that you were when you were thirty, and then suddenly one day, you don’t wake up. Now, the thing is that in general, if you ask people whether they want to die anytime really soon, then their answer may depend substantially on how healthy they are, but it won’t depend in the slightest on how long ago they were born. If we want to be non-agist about this- if we don’t want to discriminate against people who were born a long time ago- then, really we shouldn’t be thinking in terms of compression of morbidity much at all. We should only be thinking in terms of postponement of morbidity.

 

The final thing I want to say on this is the really good news, which is that when we postpone morbidity, we’re giving people an extra amount of life, but then they’re going to fall into ill health anyway, except if before they fall into ill health, we postpone their morbidity again; a little bit more. If we can find therapies that, let’s say, keep people healthy for an extra five years, we’ve got five years to figure out what to do next. Five years isn’t very long, so we might not figure it out, but supposing we have a bunch of therapies which we can apply that extend people’s healthy life by 30 years? Thirty years is a long time to figure out what to do next. 30 years is the kind of amount of time that I believe the panel of therapies I’ve outlined to you earlier on in the interview are likely to give us, which means that I think that once we get them, we will have solved all the problems that we need to solve. We will have 30 years to figure out SENS 2.0 so to speak; and, I don’t know what SENS 2.0 is going to look like. I don’t know exactly, anyway. I’m fairly sure that we won’t end up needing additional categories, but we may certainly end up needing additional examples within the categories, so there will be complications.

 

The thing is, 30 years is such a long time in any technology, including medicine, that we’re very, very likely to get there in time. Of course, after that, we may have got someone out to being 150 before they get sick. That means we’ve got another 50 years, or whatever, to figure it out. This is the thing that I’ve called, “Longevity escape velocity.” It’s the thing that gets me into the most trouble with scientists, because of course, it’s not science, this is technology I’m talking about. When you’re talking science, you can have a sensible discussion about SENS 1.0; about the feasibility of these various things that we’re already working on, but you can’t have a discussion about SENS 2.0, because we don’t know what it’s going to look like. We don’t even have a proposal, yet. From a scientific point-of-view that means we shouldn’t even talk about it. From a technological point-of-view on the other hand, it means we should talk about it. We should be asking ourselves questions about the likelihood of delivering this rate of improvement, and we should answer those questions by looking at the kinds of rates at which other technologies have improved following the decisive initial breakthrough.

 

Dave Asprey: I spend a good amount of time with Peter Diamindis, and looking at exponential technologies- I think you do, too, or at least you’re connected through the university- Singular University- and, unquestionably, I look back. I’m the first person to have done e-commerce. The first product sold over the internet was actually the version 1.0 of the T-shirt I’m wearing now, with a trimethylxanthine, ie. caffeine molecule on it. You look at how the world has changed in 30 years; of course, stuff is going happen, but the reason I was laughing so much about your brutal takedown of the compression of morbidity is that I love to talk about the compression of morbidity, because people still think they’re going to die; and, getting them to go beyond that is just too much work. I’m like look, “Why don’t you live really, really well, and of course you’ll die.” The whole point is, if you’re still 30 when you’re 80, you’re probably not going to just drop dead. Just like you said, but I find that the mental leap that it takes to get someone to think about that is just too much work that I’m happy to talk, “Of course you’ll die;” but, shouldn’t you just be young, and ass-kicking till then?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        To be honest, Dave, I think you’re right. I think that it’s vital to convince people to support this work, and I’m perfectly fine convincing them by arguments that I don’t believe. The thing is, that I’m not very good at delivering arguments that I don’t believe in. I’d rather you did it instead.

 

Dave Asprey: I appreciate the way you think, because you’re exactly right, if you’re really 30 when you’re 80, why would you die? It’s so obvious. Okay, we actually do agree there, and it’s actually really humorous to me.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        From a rhetorical point-of-view, I think it’s vital. I am very good at what I do, but I only do what I do, and so I think we need a wide variety of voices out there explaining this concept, and the importance of doing something about aging to a wide audience so that one of us which actually communicate effectively to these people.

 

Dave Asprey: I think you should keep doing what you’re doing, because it’s working pretty well from where I sit. Let’s talk about the other big question that comes up, and I’ve been public saying, “I think 180 is a reasonable age for me to live.” That’s because I started out with crappy mitochondria. I used to be obese. I have all sorts of risk factors, but I think I can pull of 180, and maybe I’m wrong, in which case, I’ll be dead, and it’s okay. People say that either that’s unnatural, or it’s an ethical thing; like I’m somehow stealing from someone else. What’s your take on the ethics of immortality.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I think that people’s concern about the ethical ambiguity of this kind of work arises entirely from the clinging to a completely obvious misconception about the relationship between aging, on the one hand, and the diseases of aging on the other hand. Basically, people have this idea in their heads that is extraordinarily entrenched that there is a difference. That there’s aging itself, which is not a disease, or not like a disease; and then, there are the diseases. This is the underpinning of a huge amount of problem.

 

First of all, it’s a huge amount of medical problem, because people go about trying to fix the diseases of old age, like Alzheimer’s, as if they were infections; as if they could be eliminated from the body without eliminating aging itself, which is nonsense. Billions, and billions of dollars is spent in geriatric medicine, and medical research trying to do that, which is never going to work.

 

The second problem is that people are so confused about whether aging is a medical problem at all that they are confused about whether it would be a good idea to fix it. You don’t get people asking whether there is any kind of ethical ambiguity about whether we should do anything about Alzheimer’s disease. People are pretty unanimous that Alzheimer’s disease is a uniformly bad thing. If people understood that it’s all part, and parcel of the same phenomenon, then you wouldn’t get this bullshit thing being spouted about whether it would be a good idea.

 

Ultimately, it all comes down to remembering that longevity is not what we work on. Longevity is purely a side effect of what we work on. What we work on is a completely ethically unamibiguous phenomenon, namely, ill health. We want to get rid of ill health, and there will be this side effect of extra longevity on average, because let’s face it, what most people die of is being sick. We’re not working on stopping people from being hit by trucks, though I guess we are pretty happy that some people are working on that.

 

Dave Asprey: That is so well said. Assuming that worse comes to worse, and you actually do die, are you going to freeze your body?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I am signed up. I believe that cryonics is an extremely feasible concept, and furthermore, that the quality of cryopreservation is improving rapidly. I keep my finger very much on the pulse of research in that area, and I think that there’s a high probability that by the time I get old enough to have a high risk of death, even in the absence of any advances in the kind of work that SENS Research Foundation does, that cryopreservation will be really good. The damage done by the cryopreservation process will be very minimal, which means that the likelihood of someone who is cryopreserved very shortly after their heart stops is quite high.

 

Dave Asprey: I’m not sold on that theory, yet, but I’m open to it. I have lots of friends who have the bracelet, and are planning to freeze their head, or freeze their body.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        The only reason to be sold on it is if you understand the details of technology. Certainly, it’s very straightforward to say, “This sounds far too difficult,” but one just has to look at what’s possible, and what’s looking like it will be possible soon, and that’s how to make that decision.

 

Dave Asprey: I’m not worried about the technology at all, I’m just not certain that restarting the hardware after it stops; that the operating system, and the things will still be there.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I can help you there very quickly. When, for example, falls through ice on a frozen lake, and their heart stops, and their brain stops as well for maybe an hour- this has happened many times- that they get revived, and they don’t even have any ill effects. These are the kinds of-

 

Dave Asprey: There is evidence, yeah.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Yeah.

 

Dave Asprey: I hear you there, and I just wonder what the time limit on that is; if there’s a wavering in the power supply in your computer, your hard drive is fine, but man, what was stored in memory; gone. It feels like there are some core assumptions about the session state that I’m not sure we can restore a session state after a long freeze. I don’t have evidence either way, I’m just, “That’s a big assumption you have to make before you go to all the rigmarole of deciding to freeze yourself.”

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Even there; even there. I’m not going to let you get away with this.

 

Dave Asprey: I’m interested, yeah.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        We do, for an absolute fact, that once you are down at -196 C, nothing happens. Absolutely nothing happens. If you can take someone down there, and get them back immediately, and they still work, then for absolute sure, and certain, you can take them back down there, and leave them there for 1000 years, and they will still work just as well. The time spent at the low temperature is absolutely time that doesn’t count. We know that for a fact.

 

Dave Asprey: I definitely understand that part of it. What I’m concerned about there is the fact that you died before they took you down to that temperature. If I was going to do it, I would want to be alive when they took me down there. That would be the interesting thing.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Right, of course, you’re not the only one who thinks that way. People have been trying to make that happen for quite some time. At the moment, there’s a number of cryopreserved people who somewhat hastened their own death by essentially starving, and essentially refusing food, and water, and it doesn’t take very long. That’s a way, for example, to make sure that if you have some progressive neurodegenerative disease then that doesn’t destroy your brain before your heart stopped.

 

You’ve always got to remember that death is not what most people think it is. Most people think of death as an instantaneous phenomenon that happens at a particular point, but of course, the medical definition of that point has changed over the years, because of a rather embarrassing frequency of cases where people have been declared dead, and they’ve woken up again. Of course, the reason for this is we actually know, as biologists, and medics, that death is not an instantaneous process. The definition of it as an instantaneous process is purely a sociological convenience, because we don’t like to have people to be half dead. We prefer people to be alive, or dead, and nothing in between, but that’s actually not biologically sensible.

 

Dave Asprey: Full agreement. Death is not a binary thing. There’s a curve to it, I absolutely agree.

 

I may be convinced one way, or the other, I’d say. I’m on the fence about that one, and your arguments have a lot of merit, unquestionably.

 

We’re coming up on the end of the show. I could talk with you for days just for fun, obviously. I’m looking at all the things I want to ask you. Let’s talk about specific goals that you have with SENS in the next five to ten year time frame. What are we going to see pretty soon here?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        On a five, or ten year time frame, our key goal is something that I’ve always called, “Robust mouse rejuvination.” We are not so much focused on getting things into human clinical trials, though of course anything that did get that far would be a bonus. Really, our focus is on getting everything working together in mice. We believe that it’s a realistic goal to be able to do that within 6, or 8 years at this point.

 

Dave Asprey: Wow.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        It might take longer. If we can do that, what we will expect is to be able to take mice that are already in middle age, and maybe double, or triple their remaining lifespan. Take that remaining lifespan up from one year, when the mouse is two years old, to maybe three years. The reason we’re so focused on that is twofold. Number one, of course, from a purely biological perspective, from a technological perspective, it’s a proof of concept. It shows that we have not actually overlooked some key type of damage that makes the mice die on schedule even though we’ve done everything. The other thing it is, is PR. It shows the work that this is for real. We believe- I’ve always believed- that that kind of dramatic result is what’s going to be necessary to overcome this thing that I’ve always called, “The pro-aging triumph;” this irrational clinging to questions like whether there are ethical ambiguities about doing anything about aging, and so on.

 

Dave Asprey: When you get the mouse to live three times its normal lifespan, and you can do it three, or four times, and you’re like, “This is a cracked code. We know how to do this,” that’s when the discussion about compression of morbidity can stop. We can just stop saying, “Wouldn’t you like to be 30 when you’re 80,” and we can start saying, “Wouldn’t you like to be 30 when you’re 180?” The conversation will change, but you have to crack that first.

 

What’s it going to take in the next five to ten years in terms of funding, in terms of regulatory change? What do you need to do this?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Okay, so you can certainly forget about regulatory change, because we’re only talking about mice, and the FDA doesn’t regulate what can be done on mice.

 

Dave Asprey: Not yet, give them time.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        You may be right. What else do we need? We definitely need more money. At the moment, SENS Research Foundation is struggling along on a budget of only 4, or 5 million dollars per year, which is absolutely pitiful. It is so insane that as a leading organization working on rejuvenation biotechnology, we find it so difficult to pull in funds. There are explanations for that, in terms of short term-ism of people; in terms of the fact that this is high risk/high reward research, which is always hard to fund through peer review, and so on; but, the fact is, it’s a tragedy, and we need to fix it, and we need to fix it fast.

 

If we don’t fix it fast, then those 6, or 8 years that I just mentioned could easily be 15 years. We could be set back by a decade, in terms of how soon we actually start saving lives. Ten years is half a billion lives that we’d be talking about, because you’ve got more than 100,000 people every day dying of aging, one way, or another. That’s the most astronomical amount of suffering. I think we could probably speed up the research by a factor of two, or three if we had, let’s say, ten times more money; just one more digit on the end of our budget. That is not very much to ask. 40, 50 million dollars a year; that is a tiny fraction still of the medical research budget of the USA for example.

 

Dave Asprey: Did the ice bucket challenge piss you off?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I think that there is room for every kind of promotion of fundraising for this work. I don’t care how the money is gained- up to a point, I don’t care where the money comes from- I just want it to be spent on the research.

 

Dave Asprey: The reason I’m asking that is not just because it was a funny thing, but it raised an enormous amount of money for ALS, which is a really important neurodegenerative disease that’s tied back to mitochondrial function. In fact, it’s tied back to probably four, or five of the seven things that you talk about?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Most of the complex diseases that we know of are indeed tied back to two, or three at least, of those things.

 

Dave Asprey: Exactly, but all the money went to this disease, instead of the causes of these diseases, and that has to be frustrating at some level, isn’t it?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        It’s kind of frustrating, yes. Of course, it depends. The problem is not necessarily that the research is focused on a particular disease. The problem is that when the money comes in, the way that it’s distributed- the particular research directions that it tends to be directed at- there the problem happens, because the overwhelming majority of research that gets funded is focused on the symptoms, not on the earlier stages; the damage that’s accumulating that is causing the symptoms, and that’s why it’s not going to work.

 

Dave Asprey: I hope that being on Bulletproof Radio this time gets a few people with nice checkbooks to write some relatively small checks to the SENS Research Foundation. It’s a worthwhile cause. Going back to my favorite ice bucket challenge video, which was Patrick Stewart- Captain Pickard- and, he said, “Here’s my ice bucket challenge.” He has an ice bucket, and he takes two ice cubes out, puts them in a glass of whiskey, and then writes a check. Done; handled like a boss. For people listening who are interested in this kind of stuff, and there’s a lot of transhumanists, and a lot of people who are just deeply interested in controlling their biology. That includes feeling amazing when you’re old. In fact, feeling so amazing you don’t know you’re old, and neither does anyone else. That’s the win.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        That’s the win.

 

Dave Asprey: For that, if you’re one of those people, and you’re looking for your charitable donation around tax time, or whatever else, I would say think about what Aubrey is working on with the SENS Foundation; it’s cool.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        At the moment, we actually have a challenge going on that has just launched yesterday.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay. I didn’t even know.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        If you go to SENS.org, right now, you’ll see it. It’s called, “Control, alt, delete.” It’s all about part of our anti-cancer approach that I was discussing earlier.

 

Dave Asprey: Okay, approaching cancer is an awesome idea, because there is a lot of funding for that, and a lot of public support for it. If you can solve some parts of cancer at the same time, many other parts of aging, it’s a double win, and everyone is good there.

 

Aubrey, we’re coming up on the end of the interview, but I have a question for you that I ask every guest on the show. If someone came to you tomorrow, and said, “Aubrey, I want to perform better at everything I do as a human being, what are the three most important pieces of advice you have for me?” What would you say?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Okay, I’m going to cheat. I’m going to answer a different. I’m going to answer the question that says, “Why am I good at what I do?” I’m afraid the answer is not really something that people can acquire on purpose, at least not quickly. I think that why I’m good at what I do is a combination of charisma, and determination, and confidence. Of course, it helps to be smart, but I think that lots of people can be very smart, and still get very little done in their lives, and make very little difference. I occasionally give a talk on this kind of thing called, “How to be a successful heretic.” That actually has more than three; it has ten different pieces of advice.

 

Dave Asprey: I will link to that in here. The other thing you didn’t say, though, is you’re relatively fearless. I’ve hung out with you personally enough times that you just don’t give into that stuff. You’re willing to say, “I just don’t care about that,” and you live your personal life in a way that’s without fear, and full of love, and passion for what you do. I think that’s got to be a part of your success formula?

 

Aubrey de Grey:        I would say that it’s another symptom of who I am, rather than-

 

Dave Asprey: A symptom, I love it. All right, I could see that.

 

Aubrey, as always, it is a pleasure to chat with you, and it’s an honor to have you on Bulletproof Radio. Have an awesome day; and, for everyone listening, I’m not kidding, and neither is Aubrey about what’s possible with anti-aging, and if you’re in the mood to make a donation, think about this. This is seriously one of the biggest things that we as a species can be working on. Thanks Aubrey.

 

Aubrey de Grey:        Thank you.

 

Speaker 1:      Get tons more original info to make it easier to kick more ass at life when you sign up with the free newsletter at Bulletproofexec.com. Stay Bulletproof.
[/expand]

Keying in on Ketones with Dominic D’Agostino – #325

Why You Should Listen –

Dr. Dominic D’Agostino is an Associate Professor in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Humans and Machine Cognition (IHMC). His research is focused on developing and testing ketogenic diets, ketone supplements and amino acid formulations for a broad range of therapeutic and performance applications. Dom previously appeared on Bulletproof Radio to talk about mastering ketosis, and he’s back with more great information. Today Dave and Dom talk about mitochondrial efficiency, chronic diseases, increasing ketones, ketone salts and esters, mitochondrial physiology, the Krebs cycle and more. Enjoy the show!

Today’s episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. To claim your 30-day free trial, go to www.freshbooks.com/bulletproof and enter “Bulletproof Radio” in the “How You Heard About Us” section.

Bulletproof Executive Radio at the iTunes, App Store, iBookstore, and Mac App Store

Watch

Listen

Follow Along with the Transcript!

[expand title=”CLICK HERE to read along with the transcript!” swaptitle=”Click to hide transcript”]

Click here to download a PDF of this transcript

Speaker 1:      Bulletproof Radio, a state of high performance.

 

Dave:  Hey, it’s Dave Asprey with Bulletproof Radio. Today’s cool fact of the day is that most people talk about measuring ketones, these fat burning molecules in the urine. You pee on these little test strips. Did you know that ketones can be detected just by smell? The simplest ketone is called acetone. That’s actually nail polish remover, and it leaves through the lungs and can give you a sweet, fruity smelling breath. If you stay in ketosis for long enough, the primary ketone will not show the same intensity in your urine, but you can definitely measure it with your breath. In fact, I have a ketone breath meter somewhere in my stack of toys, and I imagine today’s guest probably has more of them than I do.

 

Before we get on to today’s guest, if you haven’t heard about Fresh Books yet, listen up. These folks are on a serious mission to help small business owners save time and avoid a lot of the stress that comes with running a business. As a small business owner myself, I pay a lot of attention to not wasting my time and not wasting my staff’s time, and one of the things that makes a big difference is pain free invoicing for freelancers and small business owners. Using Fresh Books, you can take about thirty seconds to create and send an invoice, and you get paid online because Fresh Books gives your clients tons of ways. They can just pay you with credit cards or other ways, which can seriously improve how quickly you get paid. In fact, customers get paid five days faster on average. You also get an instant notification to tell you whether your client’s looked at the invoice the second they view it, so you don’t have anymore excuses from people saying they never received an invoice that you know they got.

 

Fresh Book also lets you keep track of your expenses. It’s ridiculously simple. No more boxes full of receipts. For me, that’s some of my personal kryptonite. Expense reporting drives me nuts. Making it simple with Fresh Books is really cool. The Fresh Books mobile app lets you take photos of your receipts, and Fresh Books organizes them for you later. It can create expense reports for you, and it also makes claiming expenses at tax time a breeze. Fresh Books is offering thirty days of unrestricted use to all Bulletproof listeners totally free right now, and you don’t need a credit card to sign up. To claim your thirty day free trial, go to freshbooks.com/bulletproof and enter Bulletproof Radio in the “how you heard about us” section.

 

I’m a little bit of a coffee snob. I love trying new coffee, but I learned a few years ago that I don’t like how I feel when I try new coffee because there are extensive problems in coffee with mold toxins and other things that just simply aren’t Bulletproof. I enjoy the taste, but I don’t like the after effects. That’s why I developed the original Bulletproof process to create Bulletproof, and we developed a medium roast profile that has a ton of flavor. I wanted a little bit more variety in my coffee, so we’ve been working for the last year with one of the top coffee tasters on earth, Paul Songer who trains the judges for the Cup of Excellence, which is like the world championship of coffee. I am so pleased to announce two new roasts of Bulletproof processed coffee beans. These are mold free, independently lab tested coffees, and they’re made at our Bulletproof plantations. We just changed how we roast them.

 

The first new roast is called the Mentalist. It’s available in whole bean and ground. It’s a medium to dark roast, kind of right in the middle there. It’s got dark cocoa and vanilla aromatics that open up to a rich, full-bodied coffee with some cherry sweetness and notes of almond and caramel in there as well. It’s profoundly good. I’ve been putting it in my espresso machine, and man, it’s crazy. You take it, and it’s engineered to taste amazing with butter and brain octane oil. A lot of coffee tastes bitter and weird when you put butter in it. Not this stuff because we built it that way.

 

The next one is for you. If you really like your dark flavored, dark roast coffee, it’s called French Kick. It’s a dark roast, but it’s not charcoal. It’s smooth and sweet. It’s pleasantly almost a little bit smokey, and it’s got baking chocolate notes, but it finishes really clean and has a medium body. This is one of the few dark roasts coffees I like. I am not a fan of those burned things that you might find at the corner coffee shop. This isn’t one of those, but we pushed it as close to dark as we could get and still maintain that flavor for you. You will be amazed at how you feel when you have this coffee, just like you are with our existing coffee. Now you’ve got a whole palette of coffees you can play with depending on if you like espresso, French press, immersion, or just drip brewing. However you like your coffee, you can do it, and you’re going to just be amazed at the flavors. I’m excited to share these with you.

 

Today’s guest is someone who’s been on this show before. In fact, several years ago, he was somewhere around episode eighty guest, and it’s none other than Dr. Dominic D’Agostino. He’s an associate professor at Morsani College of Medicine at the University of South Florida, travelling senior research scholar at the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, a neuropharmacologist, and he’s probably best known as one of the top ketogenic diet researchers out there, specifically looking at neurological diseases, cancer, and other chronic illnesses. Certainly one of the bio-hackers I respect the most. Dominic, welcome to the show.

 

Dominic:         Thanks for having me Dave.

 

Dave:  I wanted to have you back on the show because it’s been too long and because we had such a fun time on the first show. We’ll put a link in the show notes, so people can go back and hear the first interview, which was, I think, one of the very early ones you were giving about ketosis in the overall public sphere as far as I know. I learned a lot on that one, realized we had some similar recipe ideas around chocolate and huge amounts of fats and how it could make you feel amazing. Before we jump into the main reason, which is I had Dr. Veech on the show recently. Dr. Veech is a major researcher in ketones as well, and he had some really interesting comments on things I had not heard anything about in the ketone community. We’re going to get into that stuff.

 

For people listening who aren’t super ketogenic already, let’s talk about just ketogenic diets in general, do a little bit of a primer, catch up from one of the top researchers in the field here. If you’re a longtime listener, you probably already know what ketosis is, but we are now getting two, sometimes a little bit more than two, million downloads a month on Bulletproof Radio. There are lots of new listeners who are just getting into this, so we’re going to go a little bit basic on ketosis. Then we’re going to go deep on what kind of supplements should you be using, what kind of diet should you be using, and we’ll just have lots of fun because we always do. All right, what are the top benefits of a ketogenic diet that you’ve come across in your research? You know stuff about this that most people don’t. What is it, just the two cents version, and then, what’s it doing for people that you’re seeing in the labs?

 

Dominic:         The history of the ketogenic diet is really interesting. We wrote a three part article, actually, with Travis Christofferson. I think he’d be good to have on your show. It’s on Rob Wolfe’s podcast. It’s “The History of the Ketogenic Diet” part one, two, and three if your listeners want to check that out. I got interested in the ketogenic diet because it mimics the metabolic physiology of fasting. We knew for centuries if not millennia that fasting is very effective for controlling seizures when drugs fail. Millennia, a thousand years ago, they didn’t have drugs. The diet was designed to mimic the physiological effects of fasting and prevent seizures. That was the original application was specifically for seizures that result from oxygen toxicity that are experienced by the Navy SEALs using a closed circuit rebreather.

 

That work has expanded to a broad range of other seizure disorders, including things like glucose transporter type I deficiency syndrome, Angelman syndrome. We have other models of seizures we’re looking at. Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, traumatic brain injury, wound healing. Cancer is a big area of research in our lab. We have three people just working on cancer right now. Then performance in extreme environments, so that could be resilience against hypoxia, resilience against extreme increase in oxygen or pressure. These are the things that we’re looking at. We’ve broadened out into many different applications. My original application was very esoteric.

 

Oxygen toxicity seizures are experienced in a pretty small subset of the environment. The limits are pushed with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Oxygen toxicity is a limitation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and will limit the therapeutic efficacy of oxygen therapy, hyperbaric. That’s used for things like carbon monoxide poisoning. You can really only go to about three atmospheres, two point five to three atmospheres of hyperbaric oxygen if you have carbon monoxide poisoning. If you could go to five or six, if you were to put someone in ketosis, we have evidence that you could go to five and be okay and probably push the limits of safety. Then you could push the carbon monoxide molecule off the hemoglobin molecule with enough oxygen. That’s sort of the area that we’re going into to make diving for special ops safer and to decrease the side effects associated with the high pressure oxygen over time.

 

Then from the work that we did on that project, we observed all these other benefits. That expanded into a number of other projects that we assign PhD students to or post-docs to, and they are just running with it. We’re doing a lot of pharmacokinetic studies, a lot of safety studies on the racemic salts, and also, we’re comparing the R versus racemic and various formulations. We probably got twenty different formulations that we’re looking at. The most important thing, for me, is to establish that they are, not only efficacious, but also safe. I think safety is the number one priority. I’ve served on a lot of different panels to assess the safety of other types of ketone esters and salts, so I’m very familiar with the whole body of literature, very familiar with Dr. Veech. He’s one of the first people that I reached out to. Actually, one of the first ketone esters that we tested, but it wasn’t effective against oxygen toxicity seizures because you also have to elevate acetoacetate in a certain ratio. Then that got me to look into my own methods of development and looking at different esters from there.

 

Dave:  If you’re listening to this and going, “What the heck? Racemic mixtures, hyperbaric stuff,” we’re getting pretty deep on this. The reason this is so profound is that … In fact, I’m working on a new book about mitochondrial functions. I’ll have to ask you a few questions off air about some nuances of ATP formation. What’s happening is we have something called the Krebs cycle inside our cells, and this is how your cell makes ATP and how it turns food into electrons. You use those electrons to, basically, run your brain, run your cells, run your pumping systems, basically everything in your body. It’s an incredibly complex thing, and it was only hypothesized, theorized in 1937. In the last eighty or so years, we’ve come to understand what is, really, a little semi-conductor inside our cells that has amazing properties. That it’s affected by light. It’s affected by temperature. It’s affected by all sorts of environmental things.

 

We thought for years it only burned glucose except if you were really, really sick. It turns out that when it goes into its fat burning mode, ketosis, that, essentially, things that shouldn’t be possible become possible. I think you and I, Dominic, are not the first people to figure this out. Probably the first people to figure this out were thousands of years ago when they were fasting in caves because after four days of fasting your brain wakes up. You’re like, “Wow, I feel amazing even though I’ve had no food. What’s going on?” What’s going on there is what happens when your mitochondria have more power because they’re using ketones or at least have different power. What you’ve done is you’ve opened this giant maze because you start out by looking at oxygen toxicity in special forces divers, such a niche thing, and all of a sudden, you’re like, “Wait. Alzheimer’s, ALS, Parkinson’s, heart disease, diabetes.” Is there any chronic disease that you don’t think ketosis would help?

 

Dominic:         Yeah. That’s a good question. From a neurological perspective, all neurological diseases are linked pathophysiologically to energy disregulation.

 

Dave:  Yeah.

 

Dominic:         Alzheimer’s disease, the gold standard for assessing someone with Alzheimer’s dementia is the PET scan. A dim PET scan shows impaired glucose metabolism, and ketones can fill that gap and help you restore brain energy metabolism. You generate more energy per oxygen molecule with ketones than you do with glucose. For example, the energetic efficiency of the mitochondria is increased, so the electron flow through the mitochondria to generate the hydrogen ion gradient that spins the ATP synthase is greater. You have less reactive oxygen species produced when you generate ATP from ketones than you do with glucose. Dr. Veech probably went into how oxidizes chio and then you have less superoxide anion production.

 

That actually attracted me because oxygen toxicity, the theories were that it was generating reactive oxygen species. Then that was contributing to the seizures, but it’s really the source of reactive oxygen species is the mitochondria. If you enhance the bio-energetics of the cells by enhancing mitochondrial ATP production, then you don’t make as much superoxide. Instead of throwing antioxidants onto the brain and trying to prevent oxygen free radicals during it, why don’t we just enhance mitochondrial function? Then we could preserve the bio-energetic state of the cell in the face of the oxidated stress, which it would be the high oxygen content. That’s why it works. You can say that with a number of epilepsies, so the ideology of epilepsy is largely unknown for many cases. Nutritional ketosis and fasting work independent of the ideology across all different seizure types by enhancing the bio-energetic function of the brain cells. I think we’re just beginning to understand how that’s working, and it’s not one pathway like drugs to heart, one pathway. It’s many different pathways synergistically working together in syncrony to enhance and preserve brain homeostasis. That’s really important to understand.

 

That’s metabolic physiology, and it’s important to distinguish metabolic biochemistry from metabolic physiology because a biochemist, which Dr. Veech is a biochemist, and he’s very knowledgeable, and he also has knowledge about physiology. When you view it from a systems level, that’s truly important to understand even the neural control of autonomic regulation, so how it’s impacting our central nervous system, which are things we’re looking at. We’re studying the effects of ketones on anxiety. Just simply reducing anxiety, we find it’s like a whole other variable. We see a thirty percent reduction in anxiety. We just presented this work in Budapest last week. The reduction in anxiety may be contributing to the delay in seizures that we’re seeing, so we need to weed all this out. There’s many factors.

 

Dave:  I’ve been giving some talks. I gave a talk at Jim Quick’s SuperheroYou, like a brain hacking summit, this weekend, and I’m talking about the bio-energetic effects of anxiety. It burns energy to focus on stuff that like a brain paying attention uses more electrons than a brain doing nothing or a brain at peace. If you’re burning more energy because you’re worrying because you have bad programming and you’re hungry, of course hunger makes anxiety worse. If you have hunger, which is a problem with energy regulation, there’s not enough energy and that’s why I have a hunger signal, of course anxiety is going to be worse. What do you do? Eat enough so that you’re not hungry when you’re done eating would be a good way to start, add more fat, and get some ketones in there and magically, people, they feel less anxiety. You actually quantified it, which is awesome.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. When you achieve a flow state, your brain energy metabolism goes down or that the cross talk in your brain is shut off. When you achieve a flow state, you dynamically activate the areas of the brain that you need for the specific task while tuning out the others, and that’s important to understand. I think that being in a state of ketosis may help with that, and some drugs help with that too. Nutritional ketosis is very effective we think.

 

Dave:  It’s one of those things where if you look at mitochondria as being really important, ketosis because it affects so many different parts of the mitochondria is probably the biggest hack you can do to have better functioning mitochondria. Are you familiar with Dr. Shallenberger work on ozone therapy?

 

Dominic:         No. I get that question a lot though because a lot of people ask about ozone therapy from cancer and for other things.

 

Dave:  The similarity it has with ketosis is that it changes the NAD plus to NADH ratio by adding electrons directly from ozone, like there’s a free electron in ozone. You end up having a mitochondrial effect that is not dissimilar to the stuff that you’re doing, but the reason I’m asking is he has found that about half of people, forty-six percent of people have early onset mitochondrial dysfunction before age forty as measured with breathing oxygens. Essentially, looking at oxygen consumption rates. Okay, that’s one in two of us has broken mitochondria and don’t know it. With the work you’re doing around mitochondrial uses of ketones, just like you said before, you’re reducing free radicals here. You can actually fix that.

 

I’m spending a lot of my energy working on, how do we take people who don’t know that their mitochondria are jacked and then getting them jacked in a muscle building jacked kind of way? My goal is if you were to take one of my cells out and look at it under a really fat microscope, you’d see incredibly ripped and muscular mitochondria just completely covering the thing. I don’t want to be a body builder on the surface. I want to be a cellular body builder. I’m focusing on, what are the things I could do to grow better and stronger mitochondria? Given all of your ketone research, what are ketones going to do for someone listening to this who wants to have better functioning cellular energetics, like better mitochondria?

 

Dominic:         That’s a good question because they work through multiple mechanisms to enhance mitochondrial efficiency and also, ultimately, from a more long-term perspective, mitochondrial biogenesis.

 

Dave:  Yeah.

 

Dominic:         ATP production is limited, and if we do isolated mitochondria, there’s a state one, state two, state three. You can characterize how the ATP is being limited, and one of the states is reduced TCA cycle intermediates. You could have reduced energy flow to the mitochondria to produce ATP. Now ketones, being in a state of nutritional ketosis is anaplerotic. It helps generate the Krebs cycle or the TCA cycle intermediates, so it sucks in alpha-ketoglutarate. All these are elevated by twofold. They’re even up to threefold higher in the brain and in the serum. When you’re in a state of nutritional ketosis

 

Dave:  Let’s pause for a second for people that are listening. The TCA cycle is the same as the Krebs cycle. This is how we make ATP in our cells. Okay.

 

Dominic:         The Krebs cycle should really be called the Kremp Georgia cycle because there’s a guy in Hungary who also probably did most of the work on the cycle. It’s kind of interesting history there. Generating Krebs cycle intermediates is one way, so increasing the bio-energetic molecules that create energy is one way. Increasing oxygen flow to the mitochondria, the ketones enhance. One thing we’re looking at it our wound model is vasodilation. Ketones seem to couple. They help couple the energetic state of the cell with oxygen and substrate flow. It seems to enhance the vasodilate areas that need it most, which would be in ischemic wound. In our aged model of ischemia where the wounds do not regenerate efficiently, we can do a Doppler blood flow measurement and show a thirty percent increase in blood flow to the wound tissue, which has a ninety percent deficiency in ATP production because it’s not getting enough. Then that was shown years ago, showing a thirty percent increase in brain blood flow or oxygen brain blood flow with ketosis.

 

Dave:  Now, what about burn victims and people with injuries outside the brain? Is that still going to be really effective?

 

Dominic:         Yeah, we think so. Of all the things that we’ve tested so far and the model of wound healing, the ketones are one of the most effective things that we’ve seen. What’s interesting with all wound healing therapies are tried topically where you put the substance on the wound. Where what we’re doing is inducing acute and sustained nutritional ketosis with a supplement by altering metabolic physiology from a systems level, just by lowering blood glucose. We know that if we give an acute bolus of exogenous ketones, blood glucose goes down. If you bring blood glucose down by virtue of decreasing, making your blood less sludgy, you’ll increase profusion of the tissue. It lowers blood glucose. It elevates ketone levels. It also elevates adenosine levels, which is a potent vasodilator. It helps to profuse the tissue.

 

Just getting back to the mitochondria, it’s anaplerotic, so you get more TCA cycle intermediates. You get more oxygen and substrate to the mitochondria. It enhances the bio-energetic capacity, the electron flow through the mitochondria. It helps, obviously, to generate the reduced intermediates that drive the electron transport chain through the anaplerotic reactions. Then there’s less reactive oxygen species production. At the semi ubiquinone site of the mitochondria, there’s less superoxide. Making superoxide at the level of the mitochondria could be damaging because that superoxide, if it goes to hydrogen peroxide in the presence of copper or ferric iron, you can generate reactive oxygen species through the fenton reaction. That can directly damage the mitochondrial membrane and decrease mitochondrial efficiency. You get electron leak. Then you just make less ATP. That’s four things right there. There’s probably about ten things in my head that I could talk about. TCA cycle intermediates, electron flow, more oxygen, less production.

 

There’s a lot of ways. Even taking a step back, the role it has on glucose homeostasis and all the other signaling pathways that could be activated. That gets into a whole bunch of secondary reactions or signaling pathways that I could talk about. Importantly too, from … I described to you acute things that can enhance energy, mitochondrial production. Then we know that ketones are more than just an energy metabolite. They function as a histaminase inhibitor class one and two. There was a science paper-

 

Dave:  Talk about the impact of that. Just people listening don’t know what that is.

 

Dominic:         Okay. If we’re in a state of ketosis and we have beta-hydroxybutyrate elevated in our blood stream, that’s impacting gene expression in a way that’s altering our physiology over time. It’s decreasing oxidated stress. It’s conferring protection against aging and oxidated stress over time by increasing activity of things like superoxide dismutase, by activating a whole genetic program that parallels our calorie restriction. We know all the benefits of calorie restriction have been really talked about in the literature. It’s easy to find that literature on PubMed. One of our colleagues, actually, and collaborators from Yale, Deep Dixit, contacted me and did a lot of work with calorie restriction and fasting. He said, “We think beta-hydroxybutyrate may be like the metabolite that’s actually conferring all these benefits to fasting.”

 

Dave:  Wow.

 

Dominic:         Contacted me, and we formulated a diet. We basically took the standard diet and formulated a diet with our ketone ester. We collaborated with him, and he ran a study. He found that elevating beta-hydroxybutyrate suppresses the NLRP3 inflammasome. That inflammasome is linked to a whole host. It’s like the hub inflammasome that kicks on the inflammatory cytokines that are associated with many age related chronic diseases. It was published in Nature Medicine. It’s like the gold standard of scientific publications.

 

Dave:  It’s kind of interesting. Bulletproof intermittent fasting where you have Bulletproof coffee made with brain octane in the morning at the end of the fast to help you sleep. Brain octane raises BHB more than MCT oil and more than coconut oil. I’ve been doing that every morning for more than seven years now, and it’s completely changed my life. I believe it’s a mitochondrial energetics thing.

 

I also think that one of the reasons caloric restriction works, and by the way, I have no scientific basis for this other than I’m a systems guy and I’m a bio-hacker. Mitochondria, when they’re burning sugar, when they’re burning anything, they do produce free radicals, so if you eat less food, you make less energy, you have less free radicals, you get less damage. Therefore, that could confer some of the benefits, but they come at substantial cost as well. You’re cold and tired and having less energy sucks. I like to be exploding with energy, but I don’t want to die when I’m fifty. How do you manage to have more energy without incurring the damage from the energy? That’s my quest right now, and I think ketosis is at the core of it.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. Your brain octane has been something that has been a staple in what I do. The C8 is a pretty potent … The more we’re studying these synthetic, expensive ketones and ketone esters and ketone salts, but the more that we look at what’s in brain octane C8, the more impressed I get. It’s a little bit biased because in rats, they have such fast, hepatic metabolism that you get blood ketones levels … You get the same effect as a ketone ester as you do with C8, so you can easily get-

 

Dave:  In rats, but not in people, right?

 

Dominic:         Rats. Yeah. The C8’s interesting because it goes directly to … It actually profuses the liver with the oil when you drink it instead of going through … Instead of it being packaged into chylomicrons and going through the lymphatics. You get obligate oxidation of the fatty acids exclusively in the liver, and not much C8 actually escapes the liver if you keep the dosages even in the moderate to high range. It almost completely gets oxidized in a healthy liver to beta-hydroxybutyrate. The MCTs and C8 especially, they’re not esterified. It’s poorly esterified. It doesn’t get transported by CPT1, the carrier, and it can be independently go right into the mitochondria. It doesn’t need a lot of carriers.

 

We also found another benefit of MCTs that I didn’t know until I did the metabolomics is that they readily cross the blood brain barrier. Not only do ninety percent of it gets generated, eighty to ninety seem to be generated into beta-hydroxybutyrate. Then what does get into circulation can readily cross the blood brain barrier. I thought fatty acids didn’t, but short chain and medium chain do. We only took tissue when we took the hippocampus out and did metabolomics on it. We found pretty high levels of C8 and C10. We did MCT and C8. Yeah, so the MCTs are very versatile, ketogenic compounds that can be … They taste good. You can formulate so many great carriers.

 

Dave:  Some of them though. This is something that I’ve helped to push the MCT thing out there. There are companies selling some that contain C6, which is a really strong gastric irritant, so you end up, frankly, shitting out the rest of your MCTs when you have that. Then C12, which is good for you. It’s doesn’t go to BHB. It acts like a long chain fat, but it’s legal to call it an MCT. You’re seeing coconut oil companies pretend that there’s a sixty percent MCT when it’s really fifteen percent of the MCTs that actually work. I’m seeing a lot of slimy marketing activity. I’m sure you are too. MCTs, at least the ones that work, they’re just like step one of ways you can increase ketones. You’ve got like two other ways of increasing ketones that I wanted to pick your brain about here because I synthesized my own esters three years ago. It was thirty thousand dollars a kilo. I’m like, “I can’t even afford to take these myself, but I took like two samples and it worked.” Then there’s salts too.

 

Dominic:         What ester was it that you synthesized? Do you remember?

 

Dave:  I would have to look in my notes, but I worked with a third party lab. It came in a little vial, and it was insured when we shipped it because it was so darn expensive. Gees, I’d actually probably have to open up an old email to find it.

 

Dominic:         Actually, yeah, the first time, this goes back to 2009, that we acquired different ketone esters and to test which ones were going to be effective against oxygen toxicity. My original proposal to the Office of Navy Research was to feed it for one week because I was convinced that you needed to keto-adapt the animal or at least get levels … The tissue saturated, the brain. I only had enough to really give one dose, and I did it thirty minutes prior to a super deep oxygen dive. I was like, “I don’t have enough to really run the study that I want to do, but I have enough to give one dose prior to.” We gave one dose prior to the dive, and in every single animal we dove, we saw an astronomical increase in the latency of seizure. We published that, and it was like a five hundred and seventy-five percent increase in the latency of seizure. That pretty much outdoes all anticonvulsants that the military has looked at for this.

 

We still have not gone back and did a study where we feed it continuously. We’re doing some work now, but I was basically figuring if it’s this effective just getting one dose in an animal that’s eating a high carbohydrate diet prior to the dive, really, that’s what the military wants. They don’t want to have to feed something for a week. They want to give like one shot, and then hit your mission. We have long-term chronic feeding studies for other disorders, but when it comes to oxygen toxicity, we’re really just looking at a single dose prior to the mission. We screened out the different types of exogenous ketones in that project in the beginning and identified the one that was most effective and just been really focusing on that. Getting that synthesized was a project. It was a lot of back and forth with the chemist.

 

Dave:  Yeah. I don’t think that problem is solved, but manufacturing that stuff is just complex. People listening like, “Big companies can just make whatever they want.” This is one of those game changing supplements that has the possibility to transform a lot of athletic performance and a lot of … If you want to feel young when you’re old, have mitochondria that work. The average seventy year old has half the mitochondrial function of someone who’s thirty, and it’s one of the reasons it sucks to be old. Let’s get ketones in older people, and magically, they’ll get up and dance. It’s that big of a difference. I’m very hopeful, and I don’t think Bulletproof is big enough to fund the kind of manufacturing research that’s required to do this. It is a giant project, but I’m working on it, and I’m supporting everyone I know in every way I can including just by talking about how important this is.

 

Let’s talk about salts before we get into esters. There’s a hierarchy of ketones. The first thing you do is you go on a low carb, high specific fat diet. That alone can put you in ketosis. Atkin’s, stuff like that. Then the next thing you could do is add brain octane, which is basically the Bulletproof diet, which gets you in ketosis. Especially in the morning, do this Bulletproof intermittent fasting. No carbs in the morning. No protein in the morning. Extra, extra fat in the form of brain octane as much as you can take without filling your pants. You do that. Like, “Okay, something different just happened.” I can get my levels up to point eight or one point oh in my blood just from brain octane. Nutritional ketosis starts at about point eight. Then from there though, there’s ketone salts.

 

Talk about what the salts are, the four kinds of salts, what are the pros, what are the cons, and if you could, address what Dr. Veech in his interview was like, “Some of these based on whether they’re bio-identical isomers,” this is called basically mirror image molecules of each other, whether that’s an issue or not. Walk me through the salt story.

 

Dominic:         Yeah, it’s important to address the ascemic issue because it can create a lot of confusion. I’d like to address danger. Are they dangerous, and are they efficacious? I think that’s what I’ll address upfront. When we approach this question, it’s important to distinguish and separate someone’s opinion from the scientific fact and what has been published and observed in the literature. I listened to about half of the podcast. I was driving, so I don’t remember all the …

 

Dave:  I get it.

 

Dominic:         I doubt that he referenced any papers when he said ketone salts were dangerous.

 

Dave:  Yeah, he did.

 

Dominic:         I’ve sat on many boards, and it was actually in talking with him it was a concern that I had because we were testing a number of different compounds. The ones that were most effective for my applications tend to be the ones that were racemic.

 

Dave:  Explain what racemic is for people listening who don’t have the chemistry background.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. Probably be good to look up the word “enantiomer,” and it’s a stereo image of when you think of your hands as the mirror image of it. The molecules in your body … Most drugs that we consume actually are racemic, so if you go back to general chemistry when you did all the stereo chemistry of the molecules, and you were studying that, if your listeners out there had general chemistry, you probably remember. You probably came across the word racemic. If you pull out your general chem book, you can look up the definition of that. Essentially, there are molecules in your body, amino acids, lactate for example. L-lactate would be the physiological enantiomer, and D-beta-hydroxybutyrate would be the physiological enantiomer. The opposite enantiomer has a configuration that would mirror it sort of like two hands coming together. Depending on the specific metabolic pathways, the body will reject it or consume it or some may have a weak interaction at the receptor if it’s a drug or a stronger interaction with a receptor.

 

I studied lactate, the effects of lactate like ketones. Lactate is an alternative energy substrate. Before I got into oxygen toxicity, I was looking at hypoxia. Lactate is actually a very effective fuel. When you exercise, your body produces a lot of lactate, and the lactate actually goes to your brain and functions like ketones. It’s an alternative energy substrate, and through the Cori cycle, it gets recycled back to glucose. I was interested in using lactate to preserve, protect the brain from hypoxia and ischemia. Alpha L-polylactate is something that I was interested in. As a cyclist, it’s in a product called Xytomax, and I was interesting in developing different forms of lactate.

 

I saw that racemic lactate was being used as Ringer solution. Any heart doctor, any medical doc out in the field, when you’re shot, when you lose blood, when you’re in the emergency room, they fill you up with Ringer lactate, which is racemic lactate. According to Dr. Veech that would be dangerous. That would kill you, but it saved millions of people’s lives. They always use racemic lactate for that.

 

Dave:  For people who didn’t take general chemistry, imagine that every molecule in your body likes left-handed things, but sometimes you have right-handed things. It’s still a hand, but it’s not the same hand. Sometimes it’ll fit into the glove-like receptors in the body. That’s a gross simplification, but the idea there is that they’re almost the same, but they’re just mirror images. If we’re left to our own devices biologically, we typically make the L form, but the opposite form we can make in the labs. When we use it as a food supplement or as drug, it does all sorts of cool stuff in the body including sometimes kill you. Quite often, it’s useful.

 

Dr. Veech concern when he was on the show was that if you’re going to be magically raising ketones, which, frankly, give you superpowers. You get more energy than you had before, like Captain America kind of stuff. You want to make sure that you’re not doing something that’s going to give you cancer or increase oxidated stress or otherwise shorten your life or mess you up. Dr. Veech had a pretty good concern here, and what you’re saying now is kind of the counterpoint that says, “Okay, here’s all these times when we use the wrong hand in our bodies, and it completely saves lives, and it completely works,” which is a pretty powerful argument I’d say Dom. You got a point there.

 

Dominic:         We don’t progress as a species unless we move forward on truth. From my perspective as a scientist, the truth should be in the science. If there’s evidence out there that racemic salts are dangerous or that   lactate is dangerous, it saved millions of lives in the emergency room and on the field. That using these racemic compounds are dangerous, there’s just no evidence. One could ask the question, is one optimal over the other? I know lots of work was done early on on Ringer’s lactate, and they compared L versus racemic, and there was no change in metabolic state, on its buffering capacity, and its capacity to save people’s lives. I would assume the same thing would apply for ketones, but we’re interested in studying that. That’s why we’re studying that now.

 

Dave:  There are people selling it right now who haven’t tested it.

 

Dominic:         Yeah.

 

Dave:  What do you think about that?

 

Dominic:         Yeah. I was a little bit concerned until I went … At about the same time that marketers started commercializing ketone salts was about the same time that I was on various panels, expert panels to really spend weeks just going through the literature to see if these things could have any potential for danger. I just couldn’t find any. I kind of wanted to find something because I thought people, marketers were jumping the gun, but I couldn’t find evidence to suggest that they were dangerous or less efficacious. To that argument, you see Ringer’s lactate has been used for decades.

 

The DL, the racemic beta-hydroxybutyrate has been used for decades to treat a disorder called MADD. MADD stands for multiple acyl coa dehydrogenase deficiency, MADD. The kids with this, the ketogenic diet doesn’t work for them, but exogenous ketones do. They’re given very high doses of pure sodium beta-hydroxybutyrate to stay alive. This has been published. There’s lots of publications on it. There’s a publication in the Lancet, which has an impact factor of forty-five showing the safety and efficacy of sodium racemic beta-hydroxybutyrate given in massive quantities to kids over years to manage their disorder. That’s just one example.

 

I was going through a list of emails this morning with parents that have kids that have glucose transporter type one deficiency syndrome. For reasons, a lot of these kids tend to be picky with their diet, and they found these ketone salts on the market. They ordered them, and I’ve gotten emails from parents that said when their child drank these ketone salts they literally just woke up. It’s like they came out of a coma, and they’re energetic. They’re lucid. They’re active for hours until it starts to wear off, and the ketones come back down, and then they dose them up again. You have like four companies out there making them, and they’re all … They have sodium beta-hydroxybutyrate in it, but there’s also potassium and calcium and magnesium.

 

I know Dr. Veech talked about the sodium being an issue, but sodium has not been an issue for all the applications that it’s been used for. The products on the market, they spread the beta-hydroxybutyrate across a number of different monovalent and divalent cations. That’s really important, and that’s really what I want to do is formulate something that has at least a dozen or more different carriers of beta-hydroxybutyrate. You can use a list of amino acids, calcium, sodium, potassium, magnesium. I have magnesium beta-hydroxybutyrate right here I was just testing. I just took pure magnesium beta-hydroxybutyrate and can get up to about a half of a millimolar by itself with no GI issues with this particular magnesium product. You can envision getting about six different either amino acids or monovalent, divalent cations and formulating something that tastes good. That’s really important too because some of them don’t taste good. They need to be buffered.

 

When we talk about ketone salts, a lot of people just think sodium. I have a sodium free ketone salt that I’ve been testing that has no sodium in it, and it tastes really good and gets me up in the two millimolar range. The sodium is not really an issue. I personally don’t have an issue with sodium. When you’re on a ketogenic diet, your insulin tends to be a little bit low, so you excrete a little more sodium. If your RDA is like twenty-five hundred milligrams per day, you should probably be taking more like thirty-five hundred or four thousand. That would allow for a pretty significant amount of sodium beta-hydroxybutyrate to get your ketone levels up without any problems at all.

 

Dave:  I actually target four to six grams of sodium in my diet per day, and there’s abundant evidence that that is safe. In fact, lowering it to the current limits that the FDA recommends actually increases heart attack risk in studies. Sodium, if you’re a salt sensitive hypertensive, basically you have high blood pressure from salt, two percent of people are like that, restrict sodium. For the rest of you, if you’re stressed, you need more salt. Go for it. It’s fine. If you take the salt with ketones, okay. That’s totally cool.

 

Dominic:         It’s funny. That’s about what I get per day too. I get my sodium load. For awhile when I was testing just the sodium, I was getting about ten grams per day, and I didn’t have a problem with that.

 

Dave:  I’ve done ten a day, and it helped me recover. I don’t need that much now, but absolutely. It’s just fine.

 

Dominic:         Especially if you’re out … We live in Florida, so it’s like if you’re sweating, if you’re outside working out, I think ten grams a day may actually be optimal. If your energy levels are low, just take in some sodium with ketones, and it’ll wake you up and energize you.

 

Dave:  When I was in South America, I was doing some high altitude mountaineering at Mount Cotopaxi in Ecuador. I was literally adding a teaspoon or two of sea salt to my water bottle and so amino acids. All my other climbers were like, “What the hell are you doing?” I’m like, “I’m feeling good is what I’m doing.” You need the sodium. It’s one of those things where if you’re doing too much salt your body will tell you very abundantly.

 

Dominic:         Yep.

 

Dave:  We just pissed off half the physicians in the country. Sorry guys. Read your science.

 

Dominic:         When people talk about the dangers of a high sodium diet, we’re administering the sodium in processed food with refined carbohydrates, which spike your insulin. The insulin makes you retain the sodium, so that sodium retention, it’s really not about sodium intake. It’s about sodium retention, and insulin causes you to massively retain sodium. Just look at someone who’s done a pre-contest physique dieting for a body building show or something. They go from calorie restriction or low carb to high carb, and just going high carb, that insulin spike with sodium, they blow up so fast. It’s the insulin really that’s causing the sodium retention. Your insulin levels are suppressed on the Bulletproof diet, on the ketogenic diet, low carb. If your ketones are elevated, a part of ketogenesis is driven by suppression of the hormone insulin. You are excreting more sodium just by virtue of keeping your insulin low, driving beta oxidation in the liver. That whole process is just excreting more sodium, so it makes sense to get more into your diet. That’s good because I like the taste of salty food.

 

Dave:  I actually travel with a little vial of salt. Some restaurants don’t put salt out. I’m like, “What’s wrong with you?” I just put it on myself. I have a question for you about mitochondrial physiology here. I’m writing my next book. It’s like how do you hack your mitochondria, and I’m really into it. One of the things that really matters is the size of the mitochondria because if you basically move molecules apart a little bit, it takes a lot longer, there’s a percentage, for these little electrons to move. One of the concerns about using ketone salts is that if you’re using the racemic form that it’s going to reduce mitochondrial NAD, which causes oxidation of chio, which basically increases the redox span between these two parts of the electron transport system.

 

If you’re listening to that and you’re going, “What the hell did Dave just say,” what I’m saying is if you imagine that you have to take this little packet, an electron, you have to move it from step one to step two to step three. If you move the steps further apart, it’s going to take a lot longer. If you have to do it a hundred thousand times, all of a sudden, that increase in distance becomes really meaningful. Are you concerned about that?

 

Dominic:         No because I understand the metabolic biochemistry of it. What our lab does is this top down approach where we feed the ketogenic diet or we feed ketone supplementation, and then we go back and look at the brain tissue, the skeletal muscle, and we do metabolomics. What we see is all the evidence points to enhanced, more robust mitochondrial function. We can look at using electron microscopy. We can count the number of mitochondria, and now we can also look at the morphological structure of the mitochondria. I just got back from Budapest, and I was talking with an MD PhD over there that has hundreds of brain tumors. He said even in low magnification when you look at a tumor, the mitochondria, the inner mitochondrial membrane is all mucked up. Even in low magnification, you can see total crystallosis.

 

You can see malformed mitochondria. Some of them are enlarged. Some of them are small. Some of them are split in two. A lot of times, you see them forming little circular structures, which means they’re stressed. Then in healthy tissue, we just see a very dynamic dispersal of mitochondria and also the ability to mitochondria for them to migrate, for example, in brain tissue to the synapses where there’s robust bio-energetic processes happening. A lot of electrochemical radiance being shifted from firing action potentials and things like that. The mitochondria are sort of transported through the cell in different ways. In healthy cells, what you see is they all have the same uniform circular, football kind of shaped structures. Then in diseased tissue or diseased model, you just see a range of different mitochondrial sizes and shapes and morphology. With the ketogenic diet or animals or humans are fat adapted. You do see more mitochondria, and people have reported this. We have a lot of tissues to look at.

 

The architecture of the mitochondria are more consistent with healthy mitochondria. They have a more intact cristae and that’s really where all the action is happening, the inner mitochondrial membrane right at the level of the cristae. That’s really the indication of the bio-energetic capacity of the mitochondria, the health of the inner mitochondrial membrane. That’s held together by different substances and probably most important being cardiolipin. In cancer, you find a shift towards more immature cardiolipin, so the inner mitochondrial membrane doesn’t stay together. With the ketogenic diet and with healthy mitochondria, you see a shift towards more mature cardiolipin that holds the … Plays a big role in mitochondrial health and mitochondrial efficiency by preserving the integrity of the inner mitochondrial membrane. That’s really a function of ketones, the ketogenic diet, a healthy compliment of essential fatty acids, phosphatidylpoline, phosphatidylserine things like that that can enhance healthy mitochondria over time.

 

Dave:  It’s such a complex topic, and that’s why I decided that my next book needed to be about mitochondria. I’ve been following the work of guys like Nick Lane, and I just realized everything I’ve ever done that really made a huge difference including back in the day I used to shine an infrared LED, one of the first LEDs you could get, on my head where there’s the most mitochondria. Light affects mitochondria dramatically, so I’ve been doing a lot of light based interventions for mitochondria for more than ten years. I see what happens when I mix ketones, which is our topic, with other things like cryotherapy that actually makes mitochondria work better because they get a little smaller when they’re colder, so electrons move faster with ketones. You stack ketones on almost anything that makes you perform better, and you’re like, “Oh, something magic happens.” I’m excited to explain this in a way that is less sciency, but it’s pushing my limits of being able to simplify because it is such a complex topic.

 

Dominic:         These books won’t make you simplify, but these are excellent books that …

 

Dave:  Hold those still. I’ll read them. “Mitochondria” is one of them. Who wrote that one?

 

Dominic:         Yeah. There’s a number of authors, so there’s editors basically. There’s probably to dozen authors to get into the level of detail that you need to. In here, you have a whole bunch of authors.

 

Dave:  Okay. Got it. Those are basically medical textbook level things.

 

Dominic:         Scheffler is the author of this book.

 

Dave:  I may have that one. I don’t have the “Mitochondria and Cancer” book. We’ll put the names of these … There’s probably twenty percent of people listening to this right now are in the medical or healing field. It’s amazing the number of emails I get from people who are like, “I’m at this big hospital, and I’m doing this kind of research.” They listen because we’re willing to go deep enough, and there’s tons of people who aren’t in medicine at all who are just like, “Is it really true that you can do this?” Of all the guys I ever talk to, you’re one of the top ketone experts out there. Ketones are a superstar when it comes to performing at a new level. I wouldn’t be sitting here today without ketones for really more than a decade because my brain was such junk without them to be perfectly honest.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. I don’t think I could do … I just flew in over night last night, and I’ve been awake for … I’m not even counting the hours now. I don’t really think I could function in the capacity that I do with the productivity that I have been doing to get tenure recently at my university-

 

Dave:  Congratulations by the way.

 

Dominic:         Thank you. It took a lot of over nights, working on grants and publications and things like that. I don’t think I could do it if I didn’t follow a nutritional program that allowed me to have the resilience and just stay up night after night and work on things. I’m in a pharmacology department, so I’m really supposed to be working on drug research. When the drugs didn’t work for the type of seizures I was looking at, and I found out that the ketogenic diet through the Charlie Foundation was being used at John’s Hopkins for hundreds and thousands of kids and that it worked about sixty to seventy percent of the time even when drugs failed, I realized it was something I had to look into.

 

Then when I realized that you can actually create exogenous ketones to mimic that, then I got really interested because that’s like the combination of nutrition and pharmacology to get … It was accepted. Doing high fat diet research for neurological diseases in a pharmacology department is a little strange, but if you’re developing a dozen or more different types of synthetic agents that can mimic that neuro protective state of nutritional ketosis, that’s something you can build a career off of. I realize I’m very fortunate that I just stumbled across Dr. Veech and Henri Brunengraber who’s at Case Western. He helped me out a lot. Sami Hashim, Theodore, he’s like ninety-six or ninety-five now, ketogenic diet guy. These are like the pioneers in the field, and these are super smart guys who really understood metabolic physiology. Dr. Cahill, George Cahill at Harvard Medical School did the experiments fasting subjects for forty days, and he passed away a few years ago. When I was in my post-doc, I was calling him up all the time. I was calling all these guys up. I was probably really annoying to them.

 

Dave:  They probably loved it. I don’t think you’re annoying at all. You know what it’s like when someone who really cares about something calls up. I get calls like that sometimes, and you’re like, “Of course you want to talk about it because it’s your life’s work.”

 

Dominic:         Yeah. They had great stories to tell, a lot of stories. They were inspired that a younger guy was picking this research up, and they inspired me just because of their background that this was something real that I needed to get into more and study for the applications I was looking at.

 

Dave:  From a personal perspective, about three months ago I got food poisoning, and I threw up so hard I passed out, and I smacked my head on the tile and got a concussion. I actually seized for a few seconds. It helps to be married to an emergency room doctor, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that I used every possible way of raising ketosis that I had on hand, which was basically brain octane oil. I absolutely did that, and I took a bunch of mitochondrial energizers. I manufacture a bunch of them, and I pretty much have all of them on hand because I’m always hacking my mitochondria. I use red lights and other things like that, infrared and recovered very quickly, didn’t get any long-term damage. Even with that, for about a week I was kind of a zombie. My working memory was shot. I couldn’t remember words. I swore a lot. All kinds of weird stuff.

 

I think if I hadn’t had ketones present in my body during that time, I would probably still be swearing. I would not have recovered at the rate that I did. I did neuro feedback and a bunch of other stuff. I came back actually remarkably quickly. Thanks for pointing out the things you point out in your work. Because of that, I knew what to do. That’s not the sort of thing you Google for. I also have hyperbaric oxygen downstairs. We talked about that earlier. I’m lucky to have a human hacking lab. I look forward to the day when that knowledge is just common sense, and when a kid takes a hit on a football field, which happens tens of thousands of times a year, that we actually put them on ketones, and we put them in hyperbaric, and we do all those things because that will actually change enormous numbers of lives. Just huge lives.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. I get emails from parents, and their kid, they’re high school or even PV football, they’ve gotten a concussion. They ask, “What’s the best way to get my kid into nutritional ketosis?”

 

Dave:  Keep answering that.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. I get a lot of questions. People ask, “Are ketones” … It sounds like they’re a panacea for everything. Soon we’ll be saying they can cure the common cold, and when I think about it-

 

Dave:  They do.

 

Dominic:         I see three colds a year, and it’s been about seven years since I’ve been on a ketogenic diet, and I’ve only had one cold that I can remember. One or two maybe. It was just little sniffles. We get less colds as we age, but I went from getting two or three a year to one or two that I can remember over the last six or seven years. That’s really strange for me, and that’s through a lot of stress. Usually, stress always triggered it because right around finals time when I was in college, I would always get a cold.

 

Dave:  I’ll sound like the first chapter in the mitochondria book. Everything your body does is based on mitochondria other than your red blood cells that don’t seem to have them. If you could do anything that just even gives you a ten percent boost in the way they function, it’s ten percent more of everything including immune function, including everything in the body. I look at that as the ultimate hack for the body where of course your immune system is going to work better because anytime a cell needs to respond to an invader, it’s got more energy. If you have more energy, you’re going to do a better job. I think that works at the very micro level and at the very macro level. I’ve used ketones to build my company, to write my books, to be a better parent, and you could use sugar as well. It just doesn’t work as well, and so I don’t. I’m not sick like I used to be.

 

Dominic:         Yeah. Ketones are an easy sell for me because I was a patch clamp electro-physiologist in my PhD. That’s what I did with electro-physiology, with patch clamping, and I did something called a wholesale perforated patch where you take a glass electrode, and you put it on a neuron. You don’t dialize the cell, but you seal onto it. Then you have nystatin and the pipette, and it pokes little holes in the membrane, and then you gain electrical access. Then you get the action potentials and the membrane potential. It was very clear to me even early on in my doctoral work that we’re just like a bunch of batteries, and we have these bio-energetic potentials.

 

That was completely driven by ATP, ran the pumps that created the membrane potential. When I would deenergize the cell either by cutting off the substrate or cutting off the oxygen, which my background is looking at hypoxia, that’s when life ceases to exist. That’s when you shut off the energy pathways, and you can’t maintain that membrane potential. That membrane potential really is the definition of life. It drives all the biological processes that we call life. Preserving the ATP levels and the bio-energetic state of the cell with ketones, it just made a lot of sense to me. That’s when I first started studying lactate, and then other alternative energy substrates, and I came across ketones. It seemed such a versatile thing. There was ways to do it through fasting with the ketogenic diet. Then I discovered other ways to enhance ketone production. It was really like a super fuel. If you’re at the gas station and you have four choices to choose from, it’s the super high octane stuff. I wanted to study that.

 

It was a pretty easy sell for me especially since all these other therapies, all these other disorders will respond to this type of metabolic therapy. It’s a very powerful metabolic therapy that has so many different applications. If you look at my CV or what I’m doing, it looks like I’m all over the place, but that’s just because nutritional ketosis or therapeutic ketosis can be applied to so many different pathologies.

 

Dave:  It takes you there. If you follow the ketones, you are going to realize that they’re responsible for just about everything we do because they have more energy in them than sugar does. More energy means doing more.

 

Dominic:         Fat does too.

 

Dave:  Fair point. Fat, which drives ketones.

 

Dominic:         I always like to preface it by saying, “Being fat and keto adapted.”

 

Dave:  There you go. That’s a good point. Now we’re over a little bit on the length of the show, and I know you’ve just got off an airplane from Budapest. I appreciate you making time to be on Bulletproof Radio. I’ve got one more question for you that I’m sure you don’t remember your answer for because it was a couple years ago last time you were on the show. If someone came up to you tomorrow and said, “I want to kick ass at everything I do. I want to be better at everything I do. What are the three most important things I should know,” what would you tell them?

 

Dominic:         Get enough sleep. The most important thing is just to follow what you’re passionate about. I think even if you have … You probably run into people who follow a crappy diet and don’t get any sleep, but if they’re really driven from a gut level and very passionate about what they’re doing, and if what they’re doing is not self-serving and it provides a service for someone else, then they become more intrinsically motivated to work harder and be more successful. I would say, sounds cliché, but follow your heart or just follow really what you’re passionate about. If you follow nutritional ketosis and proper sleep and get sunshine or fresh air and exercise on top of that, then you’re really going to kick ass.

 

Dave:  Love it.

 

Dominic:         You got to focus on what you’re passionate about and just don’t have any fears and go for it.

 

Dave:  I knew you were going to say ketones in there, and you didn’t.

 

Dominic:         I said diet, yeah.

 

Dave:  There you go.

 

Dominic:         Fortify that passion with nutrition and sleep and everything else. Nutrition and that includes ketones.

 

Dave:  There you go. I love it. Dominic D’Agostino, where can people find out more about your work? Are you going to write a book for all of us at some point or something? What’s the deal there?

 

Dominic:         Yeah. I’m thinking about it, but right now, I think what’s important for me is to build a big foundation of research that the book will be about. I’m really deep into doing that kind of research. We have a lot of research projects that are going full steam right now, and in the process, I’m writing a lot of manuscripts and reviews and book chapters and things like that. That will ultimately become part of probably a book in the future, so I’m entertaining that thought. Ketonutrition.org is a website that I maintain and basically just put a bunch of links up there. Metabolic optimization is also a website that I started and did a few podcasts and intend to have more people on that show.

 

Dave:  Beautiful.

 

Dominic:         Those two links right there.

 

Dave:  Thank you. I look forward to having you back on Bulletproof Radio maybe in another six or eight months. It’s always a pleasure.

 

Dominic:         Thanks for having me Dave.

 

Dave:  Don’t miss out. To keep getting great videos like this that help you kick more ass at life, subscribe to the Bulletproof YouTube channel at Bulletproofexec.com/YouTube and stay Bulletproof.
[/expand]

Live from London: Tech Hacks, Gut Bacteria, Positive Energy & More – #324

Why You Should Listen –

On today’s special episode of Bulletproof Radio, Dave is actually the one being interviewed. During a trip to Europe, he met up with our friend Tony Wrighton in London for his Zestology podcast. Listen as Dave answers questions about positivity, exercise, hormonal tips, technology hacks, processing fats, combatting mold and more. Enjoy the show!

 

Watch

Listen

Follow Along with the Transcript!

[expand title=”CLICK HERE to read along with the transcript!” swaptitle=”Click to hide transcript”]

Click here to download a PDF of this transcript

Announcer:    Bulletproof radio. A state of high performance.

 

Dave:  You are listening to Bulletproof radio with Dave Asprey. Today’s cool fact of the day is that every day British people drink about 165 million cups of tea. That’s a lot of tea. What you don’t know, though, is that that tea should be protective against stomach cancer except it’s not because stomach cancer rates are higher than it should be given that amount of tea consumption in Britain. There is a reason for this. The reason is because of the British habit of putting milk in tea. It turns out that milk protein called casein sticks to the antioxidants in tea and coffee called polyphenols, and when milk interacts with polyphenols it inactivates them so your body can’t take advantage of it. Even though Brits love their tea, if they would just put butter in their tea, the way Tibetans do, instead of milk, they would have less stomach cancer. That said, if you like your tea, go ahead and drink it. No one’s going to hold it against you.

 

Are you looking to eliminate the feeling of being stuck in your life? You’ll want to check out the Unmistakable Creative podcast. They recently talked about the power of experiential learning and how it’s important to learn things by doing rather than just learning about the theory. To get creative, go to podcastone.com or download the free mobile app now.

 

Today’s podcast is going in a different direction than what you used to because it’s actually me being interviewed live in London by Tony Wrighton and from Zestology. What you will find is a really cool interview. There was an audience of about 200 people and we had more people outside who couldn’t get into the venue. It was a really cool chance to just chat about things that you might not often here on Bulletproof Radio. If you have a chance to watch this one on YouTube, definitely take it. If not, that’s all right, listen up and you will hear an awesome interview.

 

Tony:  Ladies and gentlemen, the founder of Bulletproof, the man who is a New York Times bestseller, and more importantly than that, he’s got us all putting delicious, big blobs of butter in our coffee. Ladies and gentlemen, give it up for Dave Asprey.

 

Cool, you get to make the entrance right from the back and make it a bit more dramatic.

 

Dave:  I feel like I’m on a talk show. This is awesome.

 

Tony:  Did you realize how popular biohacking is in this country and in this city? We probably could have filled this three or four times over and we’ve been turning people away over the last few days. Did you have an idea of how big your movement and the movement of biohacking is becoming?

 

Dave:  I know it’s getting bigger globally, but I haven’t seen this much interest in the UK so far, so thanks for showing up. I’m honored. It’s cool. This is our movement, anyone’s a biohacker when you start paying attention to stuff. I pushed the button on the word, but there’s a lot of personal work that people are doing.

 

Tony:  Yeah, the word and also, I think, any great movement has to have a good gimmick. Let’s start by talking about the coffee. There’s been, I think it’s fair to say that Brits are slightly more skeptical than Americans in general, and there has been some skepticism. Is that fair to say in general? We’re slightly less willing to adopt things. There has been some skepticism in the press, The Guardian said it tasted bitter and oily, but there’s a lot of people here who love it as well. Is there a sense that this is now almost becoming mainstream do you think?

 

Dave:  It was The Telegraph who said that the Bulletproof Diet was “everything wrong with America in a diet.” I thought that was a better quote. That’s because the British press is very trustworthy and credible, right? When you’re a skeptic, it’s very funny what some of the latest neuroscience shows, about 2% of the corpus callosum, that little network of nerves that connect the two halves of your brain, you have the logical side and the emotional, intuitive side, when you’re a skeptic you’ve taken the 2% of those that are really good for going back and forth and you’ve trained them as a firewall to block any interaction between the two house of your brain. The rest of us who are actually getting shit done, we’ve actually paid attention to those nerves and uptrained them so we have better interhemispheric conductivity so we can actually sense whether something is working instead of being afraid that it might not work. I love skeptics because what you do is you make them a proper cup of Bulletproof coffee, which means it’s not bitter and oily because they made it right, and then they drink it and you go, “How do you feel?” A half-hour later, 95% of the time there like, “Oh my God,” and 5% of the time like, “I’ve got to go to the bathroom.” I’m okay with either one for skeptics.

 

Tony:  Who here has tried Bulletproof coffee before? Who here hasn’t? Ha-ha. We are serving it. If you’re a bit worried about being totally wired, then we are serving decaf as well a little bit later on, as soon as our urns heat up.

 

What about Bulletproof coffee for athletic performance? Is that starting to take off? I’m thinking, obviously, we love our sport here in the UK, might we see the likes of Chelsea and Arsenal football club following a Bulletproof Diet or at the very least drinking Bulletproof coffee in the morning?

 

Dave:  I don’t really follow celebrity people that much, this last weekend I got a picture from the Bulletproof Coffee Shop in Santa Monica from this guy, I think he is well known, it was David Beckham. He came there twice. He came there one day, and came back the next day, so I know he’s tried it and he was cool with having his photo taken. Unfortunately, I wasn’t there to meet him. Also, we sponsor the LA Galaxy where most of the UK soccer pros when, I guess, they’re done here.

 

Tony:  Yeah, when their past it a little bit.

 

Dave:  Yeah, but it’s a start. It’s American soccer, it’s got to happen.

 

Tony:  I’m thinking in terms of high-performance, I know some of these endurance athletes now are switching … Obviously, 20 years ago the thinking was “You’ve got to load up with extra carbs.” Now, is there a sense that the athletic community following high-fat diets as well? Does that work if you are trying to break records, for example?

 

Dave:  It’s still controversial. I think for certain types of endurance sports you want to start out in fat burning mode, you want to be fat adapted, but you might want to switch to carbs at a certain point. There is a wall, but Bulletproof and these kind of techniques, it moves the wall way out, but you can still hit it. I don’t have any problem when someone’s like, “I’m on 75 miles of running,” I don’t know what that is in kilometers, sorry, but, “I’ve run a lot a lot, more than a marathon. I think I want to have some sugar now.” I’m like, “Good, go for it. There’s nothing wrong with that. You might want to put some things that add exogenous ketones in so you can have both energy pathways going at the same time.”

 

I’m convinced that, right now, Brain Octane, or in the UK, thanks to the regulatory people, High Octane Oil, is the number one source of exogenous ketones in the world’s diet right now because it’s the oil that converts most quickly to ketones. Of course, athletic people want to do it in a big way. Surfers are all over the stuff like, “I can get more energy per cycle out of my mitochondria,” which might matter when there is a wave of holding you underwater for a while and things like that. I’m seeing it in strength athletics, I’m seeing it in endurance athletics.

 

the mistakes that some people are making, in my opinion, is they’re going into ketosis and staying there forever. The cyclical ketosis approach that I outlined in the book seems to work better for most people. If you have cancer and if you’re one of those genetic people where you just love it and you feel that you’re never good on carbs, that’s cool, but I think that that’s the exception, not the rule.

 

Tony:  It’s obviously getting bigger, isn’t it? You’ve got a lot of people in here who come to see you today. Any plans to open a coffee shop in London?

 

Dave:  Absolutely I have plans to open a coffee shop in London.

 

Tony:  That would be quite popular.

 

Dave:  Just one?

 

Tony:  A couple of other London-centric questions. Am I right in saying you don’t like taking the tube?

 

Dave:  Does anyone like taking the tube?

 

Tony:  It’s very quick, it’s an easy gateway to get around. Tell us about your experiences going …

 

Dave:  I have a unique radar. I’m one of the 28% of the world who have genes that make us more susceptible to toxic mold. In fact, it causes mitochondrial weakness in me. When I’m in a place that’s moldy, sometimes within seconds and always within minutes, I’ll feel it, I’ll feel it in my brain.

 

I used to commute out here a lot, like once every month for about two years. I worked in Cambridge so I would fly, I’d get a couple of extra days in London. I remember one day I took the tube to go see the British Museum. Like, “All right, this is going to be really fun.” I’m on the tube and I’m starting to feel really, really weird, like seeing colors kind of weird. I walked down this long, tiled, dank hallway, the ones with white tiles on them that are just nasty. By the end of it, I’m like, “Okay, I’m getting tunnel vision,” so I was like, “I’ll just hold my breath.” It started to go really fast. I will say I was really not happy, and people who’ve been exposed many times, like I have, to toxic mold they know this feeling. You’re like, “I have to get out of here.” I’m taking the escalator stairs two at a time, and this very polite gentleman comes on overhead speakers and he’s like, “Would the gentleman charging the escalators please stop.” I’m like, “Charging? That’s using a credit card.” I couldn’t process what he was saying, and I’m sure I scared people running up the escalators.

 

I went outside and breathed and it took like eight shots of coffee to turn my mitochondria back on because caffeine changes this thing called cyclical amp, which is an enzyme that helps you make your ATP work again. Basically, I felt crappy all day. I can tell you, as a matter of fact, that the air in the tube is absolutely horrible. You’ve got pollutants, you’ve got chemicals, and you got this environmental thing going on because it’s always wet and it’s always dark. If they did air quality monitoring in the tube, no one would take the tube. It’s that bad for you. My wife, Dr. Lana, who does fertility coaching for global clients, including a few people who live in London, flat out, if you’re trying to get pregnant don’t take the tube. It makes a difference.

 

Tony:  Who’s getting Uber on the way home?

 

Dave:  Just hold your breath.

 

Tony:  Let’s talk about supplements, then, Dave. I know you’re not always willing to exactly talk about what supplements you’ve taken, but tell me what you’ve taken today.

 

Dave:  You’ve just reminded me, actually. I need some water, though. I have a little baggy.

 

Tony:  We’ve got your bottle of water here.

 

Dave:  Excellent.

 

Tony:  This, presumably, isn’t all of your supplements for the day?

 

Dave:  When I travel I do, basically, three bags a day. I need a spoon, a lighter, and a needle. Let’s see if I can figure out what’s in here.

 

Tony:  It’s quite a lot in there. It looks like there’s probably 20 pills in there or something like that.

 

Dave:  Something like that. This is relatively light.

 

Tony:  This is a live pill-taking on a podcast. Don’t know whether that’s been tried before, I don’t know whether we should ever try again, but we’ll see.

 

Dave:  Let’s see, I don’t know if I can tell you what all the white ones are, I know there’s some Aniracetam in here, that looks like gamma-Linolenic acid … No, that’s actually vitamin E, mixed tocopherols and tocotrienols. There’s an adrenal extract, astaxanthin, which is really important when you travel, Brain Octane capsule, which helps absorption of everything else, adaptogenic herbs, turmeric, there’s an upgraded aging in here. That’s bilberry, I’m really working on eye health because it runs in my family to get macular degeneration and because I have light sensitivity.

 

Tony:  What’s that half a pill there? What’s that?

 

Dave:  The half a pill right here? That is one of two things, let’s see if I can tell you which one it is. It is either an aromatase inhibitor, which prevents testosterone from converting into estrogen, which tends to happen a lot in my family just historically. I used to weigh 50% more than I weigh, my body will always convert testosterone to estrogen more aggressively than normal so I cycle on and off of these on occasion. It’s either, that or it could be cortisol. If you don’t want to be jetlagged and you get a prescription for cortisol, take micro doses of cortisol and you don’t get jet lag. It’s awesome.

 

Tony:  Wow. As you start to take your pills, I just wonder …

 

Dave:  I’ll just do it like this, watch.

 

Tony:  No way.

 

Dave:  It’s not that hard.

 

Tony:  Did you throw it in your shirt? It’s like magic.

 

Dave:  Didn’t you learn how to drink a pint?

 

Tony:  I was never good at that, downing a pint at once.

 

Dave:  It’s the same technique just drinking a lot of beer

 

Tony:  Good effort. Did anyone here recognize everything that Dave called out? Anyone? Okay. A few, she pitched half-half. Come on, put your hands up and give us a proper … Yeah, okay, a few of you. That’s pretty impressive. Quite a few of your smart drugs in there. What would you say to people who are well up for taking anything natural, which is most of what you recommend, but obviously, smart drugs are not necessarily natural in the same way that chemical compounds?

 

Dave:  Nootropics are an interesting category because they include natural compounds, but they also include pharmaceuticals. In the States, to get [parasitin 00:13:53], when I first started taking it, which is technically a pharmaceutical, even though in the US it is one of those “does not exist,” it’s not in the book for doctors. If you go to a normal doctor and say, “I am taking this,” and they can’t find it. There’s a blind spot. They consider it an orphan drug in the US, which is funny because it’s been around for 60 years, it’s made by Sandoz Pharmaceuticals and is anything but an orphan, it’s a very well-studied drug. It’s just … It’s impolite, and it’s actually not Puritan, going back to the US sort of thing, to take drugs that make you better. You have to be sick to take a drug but if you’re already well and you take a drug, clearly you’re a bad person and you probably also have sex.

 

Tony:  There are also people that say, “I don’t take drugs, I just get everything I need from my diet. I don’t believe in all this extra stuff, I just believe in getting the nutrients that I can from my diet and I eat well.” I kind of know the reply that you’re going to say but I wanted to ask you that anyway because I feel that that’s a common complaint of people who take a lot of supplements like you just have.

 

Dave:  When someone says that, the easiest thing is I just say, “How’s that working for you?” The reason they’re asking me these questions is because it’s not working for them, and sometimes you can say, “Your pants are too big, sorry.” Like it’s not working for you, you can just point it out for them. “You look like crap,” is another way you can say that without meaning to be rude or anything, but you’re like, “Let’s talk about this.” The real point here is, look, if you’re only going to get your food from mother nature and your vitamins from mother nature you, should receive all of your toxins from only mother nature. No EMFs, no junk lighting … Let’s see, you should no petrochemicals, no plastic, no plasticizers, no endocrine disrupting chemicals, no coal dust, no mercury at the levels we have today, and the list goes on and on. No stress, like modern stress. Basically, go put on a toga and live in the hills.

 

By the way, you need to grow all of your own food because the food you’re eating now has nothing to do with the food that would be coming from your own garden because a lot of it was picked a year ago and it’s not fresh and it doesn’t have the nutrients in it and it’s been hybridized. I would say that they’re living an absolute fantasy. These are hard facts. You should counteract all this crap that comes into your body with just natural stuff. It’s like I like to run marathons wearing high heels and my hands behind my back. Why would you do that? You could if you wanted to.

 

Tony:  That’s a pretty comprehensive answer. What about in terms of people living in this city and are keen to make it as London-centric and is British-centric as possible? I, personally, feel the cold a lot, much more than I ever did in my early 20s. I feel like today, the middle of summer pretty much here, and it’s pretty cold, it’s not a particularly warm country. Are there any supplements that we could take, firstly, to alleviate that, and secondly, I’m sure a lot of people have really been given pause for thought by what you said about the tube. Are there any supplements that they could take in terms of offsetting those symptoms? the answer might be no, but I guess it’s worth asking.

 

Dave:  To stay warm, there’s an interesting amino acid called L-Tyrosine that up-regulates your thyroid function a little bit. You can take 500mg in the morning, and if you don’t feel super ampy and jittery it’s probably going to help you that. Green tea extracts could make a difference, L-Theanine could potentially make a difference, and anything that upregulates your mitochondrial efficiency or mitochondrial function is probably going to help with that. I would also say, if you’re cold all the time, have you had a comprehensive thyroid panel? It is so common for people to have a thyroid that isn’t working very well, even in their mid-20s. If you go to the normal physician here they’re going to give you a test for TSH, which is one of seven different ways your thyroid can break. If that hormone is okay, they’re like, “You don’t have a problem.” You’re like, “But I’m cold, and my skin is dry, and I am tired all the time. Those might be problems, Doc.” Then you have to arm wrestle them until they agree to order a comprehensive panel, and it’s like, “Oh, you’re not converting T4 to T3 the way you should, it’s not a hormone issue it’s a conversion issue.” I would say, if you’re cold all the time, it’s worth really digging on thyroid first and foremost. You may be able to help with just iodine. It’s really hard to say until you have the data.

 

Tony:  Okay, I will. I guess there may be an adrenal component of that as well.

 

Dave:  There can be an adrenal component and in Chinese medicine they’ll just tell you this amazing thing, drink hot tea, green tea not black in China, and wear a jacket. There’s actually a belief there that if you’re cold all the time, especially when you travel, that it depletes you and that you actually work better when you’re a little bit warm. One of the Chinese guys I work with who is trained with … He can actually sit in the snow and melt a circle around him kind of guy, he was like, “When I travel I always have a jacket and a little cap stay warm especially on airplanes.” I like, “You could melt glaciers, dude.” He’s like, “Yeah, but I don’t want to waste my energy on that.” So you might just dress warmer.

 

Tony:  Yeah, that’s not quite the advice I was looking for, but if it’s all warm. What about mold? that was the second part of the question. Is there anything that we could take to alleviate those issues, bearing in mind sometimes it’s the only way that you can get across London and that is to take the tube.

 

Dave:  Sure. What I would look out there is glutathione which is one of the major detox things in your body, can be very, very powerful. If you can’t get glutathione, just vitamin C could make a difference, alpha lipoic acid could make a difference. Those are very limited as to how they’ll help you, but they can help you. I prefer … I make glutathione, you can tell I going to be biased in that direction, but I make it for a reason. Then activated charcoal, which is another thing that I manufacture, is shown, in fact it’s in the US military protocols for dealing with people who’ve been exposed to mold toxins, is one of the things that can bind them. So does bentonite clay, and so does a prescription drug called cholestyramine. I don’t think you need to be fearful because that’s also not so good for your performance.

 

What you want to do though is recognize, If I get in the tube and I come out and a half hour later I have really weird sugar cravings that I’m not used to, there’s a reason for that. Those sugar cravings are happening because your body is like, “I need to oxidize a lot of really bad things that just happened to me,” and it’s basically calling out for energy. When that happens, and this is going to sound crazy, have some sugar. When I came out of the tube and I had my eight shots of espresso, I was putting sugar into them. I don’t like sugar, I don’t even think it tastes good in coffee, it ruins coffee, but I wanted the sugar as a medical substance to give me a short burst of ATP. It makes you feel better, and you have to deal with the side effects of the sugar later, but it’s a lot better than feeling crappy when you come out.

 

You may also be like, “I ride but you but I feel just fine.” What’s happening there is you’re one of the people has really good genes and you don’t get an inflammatory response. Here’s the problem, those toxins, they cause damage to your DNA, like oxidative DNA damage. There’s two kinds of stress for the body what is called hormetic stress, what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger. Remember the Princess Bride in that movie, a little bit of poison every day so that you’ll be immune? Mold doesn’t work like that. Unfortunately, it causes damage.

 

If I’m the canary, I’m one of the one in four, and you’re the non-canary we both come off, and I might be like, “God, I feel like crap. I want to take a nap and I want to eat a cookie,” and you’re like, “What’s wrong with you?” Well, you’re still paying the biological cost for those specific mycotoxins. You’re not playing the inflammatory cost that happens because my immune system recognizes things that yours doesn’t, so you have an advantage except that you’re not aware of it, so you might expose yourself to it every day, which … I have 1200 studies on the website about OTA and stuff that’s found in coffee, and another 1400 about aflatoxin, and there’s a whole bunch of other molds. We know these things, that is a technical term. I always want to say bollocks here, but I don’t know how to use it so would make no sense. It bollockses you up. See I misused it entirely, but basically, it’s bad.

 

Tony:  I’m glad you mentioned charcoal tablets because one of the things that is Brits really like, we really, really like it and our social life is based around it, is going to the pub. We do like the booze up, most of us. Who here drinks at least very occasionally? Who here doesn’t drink at all? Okay, probably 70 or 80% of the people do drink.

 

Dave:  This isn’t representative of the UK at all

 

Tony:  No, most bars … Yeah, exactly. If people want to go to the bar without feeling too guilty what is the most Bulletproof drink that they could have?

 

Dave:  You want good quality vodka, and you can have that with lime or lemon and a little bit of sparkling water or club soda sort of things, you don’t want the sugar. Here’s the magic thing about good vodka anyway, it’s distilled and charcoal filtered which means instead of having your liver and kidneys do all the work, you outsource the work to technology and then you’ve got the pure substance that came out as a result of that. Unfortunately, it’s not all foamy and amazing looking in a big mug, I don’t know how to make that happen with vodka, but I suppose you can put it in your Bulletproof coffee.

 

Tony:  Obviously some vodkas are distilled from wheat. They say all the gluten is gone out of it, but some celiac’s won’t have wheat distilled vodkas anyway. What would you say about that?

 

Dave:  I recommend potato vodka for that difference, but here’s the thing. 20% of people are sensitive to nightshade vegetables and potatoes are a nightshade vegetable. If I eat potatoes the muscles all along my spine get knotted up and my joints hurt for a week, so I generally don’t eat them because the nightshade family has these things called lectins. Many foods have them, but the ones that are particularly aggressive, and lectins are proteins that stick to sugars in your body. The sugars that line my joints are the kind that potatoes like to stick to. When I eat those I’m like, “Wow, I feel like I did when I was 22. Everything in my body hurts all the time.” For me, maybe a potato vodka isn’t a big deal, except I can drink either kind of vodka and I just got a little drunk from them because, really, they’re highly distilled. Unless you are extremely sensitive, I don’t think anyone is going to feel the difference there.

 

Tony:  I was under the impression that tequila was actually potentially purer than vodka. I don’t know quite why I thought that, but what would you say about tequila?

 

Dave:  Tequila is made from agave which is the sexiest new vegan thing. Agave nectar, which is basically high fructose corn syrup for hippies. Here’s the problem, these are giant cacti. I grew up in New Mexico, they grow right south of the border there, and there is something like 200 species and only one of them is really fit for human consumption, but they keep overgrowing and overharvesting them. They take all the other species that weren’t even that well recommended for it, so when you’re getting your agave nectar, blah, tequila, bottom line, it’s not really going to matter. What really matters though was the worm organic.

 

At a certain point, we’re talking distilled and filtered beverages, the reason I say vodka is better is they’ve actually taken more out in the distillation process because there’s no coloring left some of the trace compounds aren’t there, but for the average person any of the distilled alcohols that are distilled and filtered, pick one you like and you’re going to be so high in the Bulletproof spectrum compared to, say, drinking beer. I don’t like that answer, that’s just how the biology works out. You’re lucky here, red wine still has issues with ochratoxin A, the same stuff that’s in coffee, but the European limits on the good stuff here are pretty decent. If you were to drink a dry white French wine, or even a French red, the limits are 2 parts per billion, if they actually test the wine which a lot of it isn’t. If you’re drinking from a high-end vineyard, especially one that uses old world techniques, you’re probably going to be okay unless you’re allergic to yeast, which tons of people are and don’t know. If you drink wine and you normally don’t feel quite as good as when you drink vodka, you’re always going to have less biological work when you drink vodka.

 

Tony:  Yeah, you cover alcohol drinks in the Bulletproof Diet Roadmap as well, don’t you?

 

Dave:  Yeah. It’s actually a whole separate roadmap, it had to be that big. It’s all free on the website.

 

Tony:  Did you test it all yourself?

 

Dave:  I did. I went to university in … I remember at least two or three classes.

 

Tony:  It’s actually really useful, the Bulletproof Diet Roadmap. I, yesterday, was feeling great, and generally consider myself to eat quite healthily, and stopped on the way to work at Sky and treated myself to some hummus. Within about 15 minutes, I felt the inflammation. I thought, “I’ll check the Bulletproof Diet Roadmap,” and you talk quite a lot about chickpeas and how inflammatory they can be. I know it’s quite random, but a lot of people would consider hummus to be relatively healthy, why is it so inflammatory?

 

Dave:  Okay. There’s two plates in front of you one is full of guacamole and one is full of hummus, why would you ever eat hummus? I would say go for the guac. The reason is these are legumes, they’re full of these lectins. They are actually different lectins than the nightshade ones, but for a lot of people, way more than is acknowledged, they cause problems. The other issue is that they have storage and contamination issues. When you take something like a relatively high protein bean and you soak it, like you would in order to make hummus, what happens during the soak time? Normally, you get microbiological activity. You get bacteria, and you can get a yeast or a fungus growing. One of the things that is a well … Isn’t even talked about in the wine industry or the coffee industry, but it is something that I do test for, is called biogenic amines.

 

These are things like histamine, is a biogenic amine, tyramine is one. You’ve heard of cheese migraines? that comes from tyramine. For some people getting a little bit of that, because you’ve soaked these things for a while and then you blended them up, and then if you’re getting them from a container in the grocery store, after you’ve made a perfect Petri dish, you got some bacteria and all from the air, you’ve got some moisture, you’ve got some … You blend it up and then you just let it sit there for a while. It’s not surprising you get that effect.

 

Same thing, you go to one of these raw vegan restaurants … Here’s what I always do when I go there. If I’m going to eat one of those desserts that taste delicious but probably have agave and honey in, like I’m not having any cards today or whatever but it’s going to taste good, you just say, “Did you make it today?” If you eat that you’re going to feel great. If they made it two days ago and you eat it, you should expect to feel a little bit zombified and to have food cravings afterwards and it’s because of what happened between when it was made and when you ate it. This whole food safety thing, it actually really matters.

 

Tony:  Just one more question on food. I think for a lot of people it would seem to be a small leap between putting butter in coffee and eating cheese, but cheese is, on the Bulletproof Diet Roadmap, pretty much the worst thing. Tell us a little bit about cheese. I ate quite a lot of it last week, and then afterwards I thought, “Maybe that didn’t quite agree with me the way I thought it did.”

 

Dave:  You could eat American cheese which would be even worse. Processed cheese food. “Cheese food product” it’s called on the label. Truly. That’s just weird chemicals and whatever residue is left over after real cheese. Here’s the main ingredient of cheese, it’s caseine, which is milk protein. That stuff is highly inflammatory, and it does correlate with levels of liver cancer, and I generally recommend most people avoid casein as much is reasonable. There are trace amounts in butter, some people who are truly sensitive have to have ghee instead of butter to remove casein, but when you minimize the amount of casein you get, you feel much better.

 

There’s also … This is what happens in cheese. You have a set of nutrients here, there’s milk, and you have some enzymes, and then you have some bacteria, and then some yeast or some fungus, depending on what kind of cheese you have, this nice blue veiny thing. And then warfare starts. Since neither one of them has knives and guns and things like that, what they do is they start making chemicals to basically kill the other one and then you eat what’s left when there’s smoking rubble and one side is left. There’s a lot of weird compounds in there that aren’t well-recognized. One of my favorite ones is Roquefortine C, Roquefort. There’s actually a mycotoxin called Roquefortine C, and we know it’s bad for you. It’s like, “You can handle it,” and actually, you probably can handle it.

 

Dependent on your biology, you’ll handle it better or worse, but I have this crazy idea with Bulletproof that handle as few things as you really need to handle, so why do you want to handle that? it could be because I like stinky cheese on my salad, at which point, great, acknowledge that you’re not only doing something good with the cheese and say, “All right, fine, I’m going to deal with it. I will take some charcoal, or I’ll just be tired, or maybe it’ll have no effect at all because I’ve identified that stuff isn’t a suspect food for me, I’m totally fine with it.” Most people I know who give up cheese for a couple of weeks, they think clearer, they have fewer food cravings, they have less muffin top, their skin looks much better, you can see it in the skin most of all, and it’s a subtle thing. It’s like, “I had this cheese, I feel fine,” and then check yourself one day, two days, three days, four days later as different layers of inflammation unveil themselves.

 

I will tell you, I have kids and I live on an island where literally the cows that I eat, eat the grass from the front part of my farm, so I’m as local as you can get. Maybe once a month, I’ll make Bulletproof pizza. I will use grass fed, local cheese, and I’m still somewhat sensitive to it, but I can tolerate that reasonably well, but every time I do it, the day after my thinking isn’t as good. It’s not like my thinking isn’t pretty good almost all the time now, I’ve dialed that in. I used to have brain fog all the time I couldn’t remember words, what was I going to say, why did I open the fridge, where are my car keys, all that stuff has become effortless for me. It just doesn’t happen even if I only got three hours of sleep or something, actually, like I did last night, I’m totally fine. I can bring it. If I have cheese, a couple of days later, I’m just not … I’m 80% there, but I’m not 100% there.

 

it’s that nuance, when you start paying attention to, “Wait a minute. Why do I feel like this right now?” That really can instruct you a lot. No one told me 20 years ago, when I started taking notes on this, that what I did four days ago could have an impact on me. It drove me nuts for years. I thought I was fine on gluten, so I would eat gluten on one day and the next day I was really fine, but the day after that, I was really not fine. To know there’s a lag time when you eat cheese is kind of important knowledge that hasn’t been out there.

 

Tony:  That’s quite hard to track isn’t it? I did want to ask about tracking. Who here tracks in some way some aspect of their lives? just put your hands up. Okay, so most of us. Who here is wearing a tracker? Not that many. It’s quite hard to track, as far as I have found, I’m a bit of a tracking geek and I’ve got a feeling my obsession with tracking isn’t necessarily healthy. In terms of being able to track something like, “I ate cheese and a two days later I felt bad,” I haven’t found anything that does the job particularly well. Have you got any recommendations for tracking?

 

Dave:  There’s a free app called Food Detective, it’s one that Bulletproof developed, and it’s free because it’s actually important stuff. What you can do with that is shortcut a little bit. If you’re truly sensitive to a food, you use this app in the morning, it gives a baseline heart rate. Not heart rate variability, just heart rate. Then you tell it what you ate, and you get your heart rate before and after a meal. If there’s something in a meal that you’re sensitive to, it’s going to raise your heart rate by about 17 beats a minute within 90 minutes after you eat. You could use this, which is maybe less of a tracking thing, but maybe more of a detective thing.

 

I advise people to track what you hack. There is something called exposome, and this is a word that was invented maybe seven years ago. This is a set of all the environmental things around you that you’re exposed to over the course of your life. It’s thousands of time bigger than the human genome. Because I have no idea if the planetary alignment really makes any difference or not, but it’s something you’re exposed to, and if you want to eliminate that variable, you might want to pay attention to that.

 

The idea of tracking could be really misleading. You know why cholesterol is so feared? because it was one of the first things we could track and blood, so we obsess about cholesterol even though it turns out it wasn’t that terribly useful after all. I get these, going back to the skeptics, “You can’t change more than one variable.” I’m like, “That’s a laughable statement. Everyone is changing tens of thousands of variables a day, you just don’t know what they are. What path did you take to work today? does that affect your drug trial outcome? no one knows because no one ever tracked it, but it wasn’t the same every day.” This idea of only changing one variable at a time is laughable, and it doesn’t work when you’re testing supplements. You want to be attention to that when you’re tracking.

 

It’s better to pick a goal and say, “What are the variables that I can think of that might affect the outcome?” and just focus on that one outcome and change all of the variables that might do it until you get what you’re looking for. Then you can zoom in and change five or ten things. If you were to try every supplement on the market for one month to see which one worked, two things would happen. One is you would die before you tried them all. The second thing that would happen is that you would probably miss a lot of the things that are multifactorial.

 

The biohacking approach is, “I wanted to change X. Why don’t I take every supplement that, in the study, can change X and see if I get where I want to go and then back off?” My first several years of trying to change things biologically, only one variable at a time, and it’s a hopeless, fool’s errand. It doesn’t work, and it’s a lie to yourself because you already changing every variable every day. You just aren’t paying attention to them.

 

Tony:  I tend to think that some of the tracking devices that are coming out now actually would almost have a detrimental effect on your life because of the lack of focus that comes from wearing an iWatch that tells you every time you get a Whatsapp message when you could be going more in depth into whatever you’re doing you agree with that

 

Dave:  Absolutely. I was CTO of Basis, a wristband company, the first one they got heart rate off the wrist the way that Apple watch does now, and Intel bought that company for $100 million. I can tell you categorically that the type of information that you’re getting from those watches is very suspect. It’s suspect because, calories burned, I read a post naming studies. 50% of the calories you burn have nothing to do with how much you move, so how are these watches doing that? What is useful is did I move more or less than yesterday? that’s a useful data point, but the calorie count is just pure fiction. It has no basis in reality. If you look at the cost of interruption, I spent 10 weeks of my life with electrodes glued to my head doing the 40 Years of Zen program and things like that, I’ve had my own EEG at home since 1997. When the phone rings you absolutely see, you go straight into fire or flight, you go into beta right out of alpha, right out of theta, all the places where intuition, and creativity, and calm focus come from. Every time an alert comes through, it basically kicks that part of your meat operating system, what I call the Labrador brain in the book. It says, “Look, threat, right now,” and this takes you out of productivity mode, out of focus mode.

 

I turn alerts off on pretty much everything I think I get text message alerts but almost no one texts me and I would turn those off if everyone started to text me. I don’t get any email alerts. If my phone rings, I will get that alert although I probably won’t answer it because I’m likely on a call already. When I’m not on calls, I put my phone in airplane mode because I really … If you don’t have an appointment, you probably can’t reach me unless you’re my wife.

 

Tony:  It’s just good for the important parts of the body to have it in an airport mode isn’t it?

 

Dave:  It’s certainly not going to harm them to have it in airplane mode.

 

Tony:  Let’s just check has anybody got their phone in the pocket and it’s not an airport mode at the moment? just put your hand up. It’s okay we won’t judge.

 

Dave:  Here’s the thing, look where my pocket is. Notice my pocket as far away from the important stuff.

 

Tony:  You buy trousers, that’s good.

 

Dave:  Hashtag biohacker pants.

 

Tony:  One thing I’ve asked everyone on this podcast is what is one book that you would recommend that’s had a really profound impact on your life, and one tip for living with more energy, vitality, and motivation. One book and one tip.

 

Dave:  One book and one tip. It’s hard to pick just one book because I’ve read thousands, and a lot of them are boring biological books, but let me go back to the book that I read when I was 16 called Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, kind of a classic. The reason I’ll go back to that is they tell you to set goals and focus on them every day, real basic biohacking stuff. It’s not biohacking at all, but I wrote this goal down and I said, “By the time I’m 23, I want to have $1 million.” Why? Because I thought $1 million would make me happy. Turns out there’s not much correlation there. No one told me that. I can tell you it categorically didn’t work because I made $6 million when I was 26, but I didn’t make $1 million when I was 23. Still, I thought it was a good book. It actually really affected my career.

 

I would just say if you’re reading that book, or any of the other books like that, the latest book that’s worth reading is the Code of the Extraordinary Mind which just got published by Vishen Lakhiani. A really good book that has some of that kind of stuff and some more modern stuff in it. What will happen is you can get what you ask for, and the same thing goes when you’re tracking yourself. If you’re tracking calories, “I’m going to eat less calories today,” you’re going to get what you ask for. You’re going to have less energy. Just make sure that you’re very, very conscious and aware in the language that you use when you’re setting a goal because if you set a biohacking goal, or a life goal, or a success goal, or whatever it is, your body is stupid and it might interpret those goals very literally. Make sure you run it through the logic filter as well as oh-that’s-what-I-thought-I-meant kind of filter.

 

Tony:  What about one tip for living with more energy and vitality?

 

Dave:  Probably the easiest thing to do is to get higher quality sleep. This is going to sound a little bit weird, but healthy people need less sleep. If you want to get good quality sleep, doing anything that makes your biology work better is the right approach. If you need 10 hours of sleep at night, your chances of dying of all-cause mortality are much, much higher than someone who sleeps six hours a night. That actually is a symptom. It’s okay that you’re getting 10 hours of sleep to recover, but you need to start looking at that really carefully. If you just have to have eight hours of sleep, maybe that’s all right, but actually, a need for lots and lots of sleep, unless you’re doing something like heavy workouts every day, you’re a professional athlete or something, there is something not right in your biology. Pay attention to the quality, not necessarily the length of your sleep. That’s probably the biggest thing you can do.

 

Tony:  I’m sure I’ve heard you say before you only sleep six hours a night or less?

 

Dave:  Let’s see, I do track that, it’s probably the one tracking thing that I do that’s pretty straightforward.

 

Tony:  What do you use to track it?

 

Dave:  I use an app called Sleep Cycle. In the last 1178 nights, my average time was six hours and one minute. It’s trended up by one minute in the last year.

 

Tony:  I feel like there’s some sleep experts who would say it’s not enough.

 

Dave:  Do they look tired?

 

Tony:  Ladies and gentlemen, we’re going to take a little break there. Think of your questions that you would love to ask Dave. Obviously, the bar is open for vodka and tequila, but not beer. You can also mingle at the back, we’ve the stalls you can obviously go and collect your Bulletproof goody pack whenever you like, they’re all at the back. We’ll come back in 15 minutes time with the Q&A. Give it up for Dave Asprey, ladies and gentlemen.

 

Tony:  We are ready with our second part of our podcast. Who has a question for Dave? I feel that this man with a red shirt has been so enthusiastically sticking up his hand. Shout out your question and we’ll go for it.

 

Ocant: I will stand up and shout it out. Dave, you talked about high-performance could you say …

 

Tony:  Okay it’s a question about low performance and how to react when you don’t feel like you’re acting optimally at high-performance, and what’s your name?

 

Ocant: [Ocant 00:42:58].

 

Tony:  Ocant.

 

Yani:   My name is Yani.

 

Tony:  Johnny?

 

Yani:   Yes, close enough.

 

Tony:  Very polite as well. Dave?

 

Dave:  Recovery is one of the highest performance activities you can do. If you’re postsurgical, or you have something you’re working on and you have massive adrenal fatigue, the state of high performance you’re going after is high-performance rest. Sleep quality is high-performance sleep versus low-performance sleep. If you are in a place where you hurt yourself in an athletic event or something like that, the exercise recommendations are going to change, and this is going to sound a little bit weird, but working out really hard when you’re sick or when you should be recovering probably isn’t going to help, so number one back off. Number two, that whole thing about cyclical ketosis is really important. You probably are going to benefit from having moderate, non-sugar carbs at least some of the time, and there’s good evidence for that. There are people who recover just fine on pure ketosis, however, I think if you test them both you figure out which one works pretty well.

 

Some of the supplement things are very different if you’re dealing with injuries or post surgical stuff, depends on where the surgery is. A lot of the stuff that I like turmeric, vitamin E, fish oil like DHA or EPA or krill oil, they make you bleed. That’s a good thing if you’re four days after a surgery or six days after, depending on how deep and what they did, but if it’s right before surgery I don’t think your surgeon’s going to be that happy when they poke you and you leak everywhere. What I think you want to do there is look at recovery and rest as some of the most important things where you can modify your performance. Those are not low-performance states at all. Performance doesn’t mean you’re moving, it means you’re doing whatever you’re doing better. At that point, all you’re doing is getting unsick or recovering from a major trauma, which is surgery or something else.

 

Tony:  Super stuff. We’ve got three or four seats here and two there if anyone is milling around and wants to come and sit in the front, you’re very welcome to come down here. The chap who is perched on the table thing over there with a black T-shirt. What’s your name and what’s your question?

 

Francis:           Thank you, I’m Francis. How many times have you been asked …

 

Tony:  That’s Francis asking the top three things for high-performance.

 

Dave:  I’ve never heard that question. The top three things to kick the most ass. I actually give different answers each time because you’ve got to mix it up a little bit. This will be a funny answer, I’ve never answered it this way, but there’s three voices in your head and there’s one answer for each of those. The three voices in your head are there to keep the species alive forever, and if you were to design an animal that wasn’t very smart, you’d just have to have these three things in there and you would have a species that would go on until the meter strikes or something.

 

The first behavior is run away from scary things that might eat you, and that’s pretty good. The second one is eat everything so you won’t starve to death. The third thing is have sex with everything possible to make sure the species reproduces. Now, this is the Labrador brain, if you’ve read the book, and these are the core operating principles of your meat. The very fiber of your being, that’s what you’re wired to do because you don’t need your monkey mind in there at all to survive as a species. We can have all sorts of bad things happen, and we’d still probably have really stupid humans a while from now if we could just do those things right.

 

That means that the top three things you can perform better is to own each of those voices in your head so that instead of having the dog that jumps on you and humps your leg and slobbers on you, you have what’s more of was a service dog inside of your head where it sits and it behaves and you put a piece of popcorn on its nose and it won’t eat the piece of popcorn until you tell it to eat the popcorn, and it doesn’t hump anyone’s leg unless you tell it it’s okay and it’s going to be fun, and things like that. It comes down to understanding that those three urges are actually not you, those are your meat. Having that perspective really gives you that ability to say, “All right, that’s a behavior, it isn’t a weakness. It’s actually a built-in behavior that automatic. Now that I have awareness that it’s automatic, I then can take control of that behavior and I can train my nervous system the way you would train a dog.” When you do that, you’ll find that you can perform better at every single thing you want to do and you don’t even have to drink coffee to do it.

 

Tony:  I know you mentioned heart rate variability, you did that today, is that something that can help with that?

 

Dave:  Yeah, for the run away from scary things heart rate variability training is one of the ways to do it. For the food thing, all you need to do is get your blood ketone levels up to 0.5 and your … There’s two hormones that change. One is called ghrelin, which is I’m hungry all the time hormone, and the other one is called CCK, which is actually by Calvin Klein. CCK is the fullness hormone. 0.5 is below nutritional ketosis. Can Brain Octane oil, in most people, bring your levels up that high before it causes disaster panics? Yeah, because Brain Octane actually doesn’t cause disaster panics very easily. NCT oil does cause disaster panic quite easily, but Brain Octane has a very different effect and it’s much more ketogenic. If you can get your ketones up just enough, there, the dog stops trying to eat everything because it’s like, “I’m too full to eat everything.” It stops running away from everything because you’ve trained it to sit. All you have to do is deal with that third one. That’s a longer discussion.

 

Tony:  What questions have we got here? Lady in the front row. What’s your name and what’s your question?

 

Kate:   My name is Kate and I don’t tolerate caffeine very well …

 

Tony:  The question is Kate doesn’t tolerate caffeine very well. She is wondering if she can get the same benefits from decaf as from the normal Bulletproof coffee.

 

Dave:  I would have phrased that as, “Kate is weak.” Just kidding. In most of the studies about the benefits of coffee, they are based on polyphenols, decaf works just fine. In fact, what I’ve been doing for about the last year, I was going to talk about this at the conference, but I’ve intentionally upped my coffee dose. Bulletproof coffee has different it’s called pharmacokinetics, which is the delivery system for trimethyl xanthine caffeine. When you mix it in with Brain Octane, with butter, when you blend, it you’re doing all sorts of things that affect how that is absorbed by the body. It turns out that if you do that with just a normal coffee that’s caffeinated, you’re going to want less coffee than if you drink normal coffee where you drink it and you crash, then you drink it and you crash all day.

 

I could drink 5 cups of regular coffee because I had to, but I don’t really want to drink 5 cups of Bulletproof coffee even if I’m drinking a black because it’s just too much for me. I usually have two good size cups of coffee. I’ll have one in the morning and a couple of shots of espresso. At lunch, I just pour Brain Octane on my food if I’m going to have lunch. On a day like this where I’m traveling a lot, I might have two Bulletproof coffees, but at home, I have three more decaf coffees because the benefits stack up in studies from decaf.

 

The problem with the decaf is that, even here where there are some standards, they’re not that tight, but there are some standards around one of the 25 molds in coffee that I test for. They’re twice as high for decaf coffee, and because decaf coffee is always moldier because they would never use good coffee to decaffeinate it because it ruins the flavor. When I make decaf, we use lab tested coffee and then we use a Swiss water process and carefully control humidity. The Swiss water plant is very near to where I roast so we can do this high quality, low toxin decaf.

 

I actually react really poorly to decaf coffee, much more so than caffeinated coffee when it’s just run-of-the-mill. Even if it’s really good tasting, high-end coffee I get a lot of anxiety from it, physical anxiety, from the mycotoxins in it. I would just say be careful with the decaf you drink, but you get more benefits and more polyphenols.

 

there is emerging evidence you need two grams of polyphenols a day, which is quite a lot, and I actually can’t tell you off the top of my head how many grams of polyphenols are in a cup of coffee but it’s on the order of 100mg or something like that probably depending on brewing technique.

 

Tony:  Good? Great. Right, who’ve we got? Lady there with her hand up.

 

Natalia:           Hi, my name is Natalia and I would like to know how to …

 

Tony:  Natalia wants to know how to maintain positivity or and you said a positive charge.

 

Dave:  I had to determine whether you are talking about electrically grabbing myself, I want to keep a negative charge by my side, I don’t want to keep a positive energy to get you there. There’s something I do with my kids every night, and it’s really, really important. What I do is I sit down, they’re six and nine, and I say, “Tell me something you did today that was a win.” A win is something that you actually worked on that happens and then I go, “That’s awesome. You did it.” The next step is, “Tell me something that’s a fail.” A fail is something you worked on that you didn’t get, and we celebrate that even more because that means that you learned something because you were pushing yourself because if all you have is wins, you’re not trying very hard. That completely removes the fear failure from my kids because they actually get praise for failure. I do the same thing with my employees, not quite at that level, but even in my own internal dialogue it’s like, “This didn’t work, won’t do that again.”

 

From there I go on to, “What’s your act of kindness for today?” You find one thing that you did that day where you were actually kind to someone. I met some homeless person in France yesterday. She was out at 11 o’clock at night with the baby. She could’ve been out with a baby just because she knows she’ll get them a sympathy, I don’t really care, it still sucked. I gave her whatever, I don’t remember what currency was in my pocket, but it was a lot more than she was expecting. It didn’t change my life, but it might’ve changed hers. There, I got my act of kindness. I also tip heavy because I’m in a place in my life where doesn’t matter if I throw in an extra couple of whatever the local currency is, but it actually matters to the person serving the food. Or you hold the door, or you put someone’s luggage out, it doesn’t really matter. Just recognize that you did something kind every day.

 

then we do three gratefuls and these are three things that happened that day that you are grateful for that just happened that you didn’t plan, you didn’t strive for, you didn’t try for. I don’t believe it’s possible to have a negative attitude on life if you focus on gratitude every night, and maybe every morning if you’re feeling really crappy. If that doesn’t work, heart rate variability training. For me, 10 weeks of having electrodes on my head during 40 years of Zen style training learning when I’m lying to myself, pretty much anytime it’s a negative thought I’m like, “There’s my ego again. Go pump that leg over that ego, I’ve got shit to do.” You just recognize what’s you and what’s not you. The negative stuff that you’re recognizing as, “I’m not feeling positive,” that’s actually your meat operating system betraying you. That’s my perspective.

 

Tony:  Awesome. Who next? This man here.

 

David: David again. You push a higher fat diet and as there’s a lot of debate …

 

Tony:  It’s David asking about high-fat and recent debate over …

 

David: APOE4.

 

Tony:  Yeah, that one.

 

Dave:  I would say that the science isn’t in on APOE4 but there’s some really interesting discussions. When people talk about high-protein or high-fat, it doesn’t mean anything. The same thing as plant-based and vegetable-based. For instance, my favorite animal-based protein is snake venom, so clearly all protein is deadly and you should never eat at. My favorite vegetable protein is sarin nerve gas, which is actually a lectin, so you should never eat those either. When someone says high-fat diet, “that’s a high-fat diet fad,” they almost never talk about specific fats, and when talking about high-protein they don’t talk about specific amino acid ratios or di and tripeptides, but that’s actually where the metal hits the road.

 

I would say if you’re dealing with that, look at your inflammation markers which are really, really important. Look at the other markers that you’re paying attention to. Experiment, but one of those types of fats that gives you the most ketosis more than any other fat is Brain Octane. That stuff isn’t going to have the same effect on cholesterol, in fact, it has almost no effect on cholesterol in the studies that I’ve seen. You can push one sort of fat, maybe you want to push olive oil, maybe you want to push only DHA, but until someone looks into those things, I think it’s dangerous to say you should be on a high-fat or a low-fat diet. Because, actually, high amounts of the right kind of fat is what I recommend for people, and even then it’s a pretty big range from 50 to 85% depending on what your goals are. Without lab tests for you, I think it’s going to be a very long time before we can say, “This is one genetic marker,” ignoring the other million of them that are out there, that “everyone should do this.” Well, this is a directional thing for you with APOE4 but what do the labs they with your own thing.

 

And speaking of all the genetic things, in about a month I’m doing this thing called HLI where I’m having my entire genome sequenced and doing IBM Big Blue kind of data analysis stuff on it, so I’m hoping to learn a lot more very interesting things you don’t get from 23andMe. Eventually, we will do that for everyone.

 

Tony:  23andMe is the sequence of finding out much more about your DNA then you’ve ever been able to before if you’re just a normal person.

 

Dave:  It’s a partial sequencing for 99 bucks, thanks for pointing that out. The full human genome was $100 million that Craig Venter spent to do his and now I don’t know how much it costs because I worked a deal, but it’s still pricey.

 

Tony:  Has anyone done 23andMe? Useful, just I’m waiting for the results. It takes ages to wait for the results. Good. Anyone at the back want to ask a question? I am aware that … Lady in black.

 

Actia:   My name is Actia. I wanted to know if you could comment on the effect …

 

Tony:  Great. Actia asking about Bulletproof coffee specifically for women and hormonal.

 

Dave:  There is a great blog post on this called something like Bulletproof Fasting and Women and I go into a lot of detail on this. My first book, the Better Baby Book, had an enormous amount about female hormones, infertility, and things like that. The people who are saying, “You shouldn’t have coffee because of hormones,” are concerned about cortisol from coffee whereas many of the studies, in fact, almost every study of coffee and cortisol is using instant coffee because scientists don’t know there’s a difference. In Europe, where there is a standard, it’s much, much higher for what they call soluble coffee or instant coffee. They’re actually testing things they don’t know the testing, and it’s usually not stored very effectively. It’s in a lab, there’s humidity, and it’s not very well-controlled but they don’t quantify what’s in the instant coffee before they test it because, in their mind, coffee is coffee. I find that there’s a difference and that there is a likely difference in cortisol, depending on whether there are compounds that directly attack the adrenal medulla, which mycotoxins that are found in coffee do actually do.

 

I would say purity of coffee matters, and timing of coffee matters. For women, I suggest protein in the morning, especially if you’re having a hard time with your hormones, and you might actually need to not drink coffee or only drink decaf coffee. It happens. It happens with guys, too. There’s nothing wrong with doing, say, green tea, but I know women who can’t tolerate green tea either for various reasons. There are also weird things that happened when your cortisol can convert … What’s the one … There’s an Eastern European one where your cortisol converts to one of the … To testosterone, I think, if I’m remembering what this pathway was. It was completely bizarre. It was 1 in 400, globally, who have it but 1 in 40 Eastern European women have it. You ran into things like that where it’s very, very individualized.

 

if you’re having issues with hormones, a high-fat diet is a very likely a good thing to do, Brain Octane is very likely a good thing to do, and if you’re like most people, coffee, one cup in the morning, maybe when you first wake up if you wake up like a zombie, or an hour or two after you wake up if you wake up happy and bright early in the morning like those people we all hate. The timing could matter, and you might need to have it with food. There are some people where, even if they put protein in the coffee, it’s not enough. Your mileage really can vary and there’s nothing wrong with saying, “I don’t want to do coffee,” but I still would encourage you to play with Brain Octane, and you can always use chocolate.

 

Tony:  Good stuff. Right, who have we got? The chap in the pink shirt.

 

Henry:            Hi, Dave. My name is Henry. What is the most …

 

Tony:  Henry is asking what is the optimal amount of exercise for someone to do who just wants to be healthy and wants plenty of time to rest as well?

 

Dave:  The New York Times called me “almost muscular,” which is the best quote ever because if you want to live a long time, that’s how you want to look. You don’t want to look like a balloon animal, no offense because if you want to get swole, that’s cool, that’s biohacking and that’s where you want to take your body, but your [altodine 01:00:43] go up substantially if you’re carrying too much muscle mass. That’s an interesting thing. If you’re too lean, that’s another issue. Going down below 10% body fat for men or women, it might look hot according to the current standard, but it is not the look of a healthy animal that’s going to live to 180 the way I’m planning on. You actually need to be a little bit heavier than that, I’d say probably like 14% as long as the fat is composed of good stuff, it’s got adequate amounts of DHA and EPA and not lots of Omega-6 and things like that.

 

it also is going to depend on your own biology. Some people respond very differently to exercise. I can put on muscle very easily, it’s in my genes. Andy Hnilo, who is a friend, he runs Alitura, I had him up to the lab on Vancouver Island. He’s like half my age, he’s 30 but younger than me, and he is a cover model for Oakley, dripping in veins and just absolutely ripped, but I outperformed him on the ARX machine doing chest presses. He was pissed, you could tell. It’s a genetic thing there, he’s clearly in better shape than I am. You have your own genetic differences. I respond very well to weight-bearing exercises like that.

 

if you look at what your body does, look at where you want to be from a fat perspective and do, I would say, the minimum amount of exercise you require to do that, and then, and here’s where it gets really weird, move a lot. This means go for a walk, I like the Bulletproof Vibe because it’s kind of like a walk but in a lot less time. Sometimes you just don’t have time for a walk. Do yoga, do stretching, but just don’t count that as exercise. Take the extra time you have and apply it to movement, which is neurologically beneficial. It raises something called BDNF, brain derived nootropic factor, which causes you to actually grow new neurons and you’re going to get the most benefit from that. You could probably, if you’re younger, push yourself harder, “I’m going to work out four times a week, I have extra time to sleep.” You could. You could also meditate in half that time and probably get more benefits.

 

Tony:  Great. Let’s come down from the chap in the stripy shirt.

 

Mike:   I want to ask about protein fasting. I haven’t been able to find much information other than what you’ve written on it …

 

Tony:  Mike asking about protein fasting, how you managed to find that much information about it out and about, and is it a good thing if you’re training a lot.

 

Dave:  If you’re planning to put on a lot of muscle, and you’re training a lot to just put on mass, you might want to skip it for a while. It’s really important to allow the cells in your body to clean themselves out. There is good studies, I cited several of them in the diet book, this is not something that is commonly understood. How many of you here have tried one day a week protein fasting? Now leave your hand up if you notice a difference from it. Almost all of the hands stayed up. It is kind of amazing what it does. You’re like, “Why would that make sense that I am thinner right here after I did that? I got the same amount of calories, I actually ate more carbs than I did which means I’m putting in glycogen. Something is happening here.” As an anti aging, high-performance, I want to live a long time, I want to feel good while I’m living a long time, I think there’s really a role for it, but if you’re really working on a protein bulking phase, don’t do it for six weeks. At the end of six weeks, you might really want to do that because your cells are going to benefit from that.

 

It’s really tough like for the Hollywood people with they’re expected to look chiseled muscle with no fat, but they’re also supposed to look good when they’re 60. Those two things actually are opposite ends of the teeter-totter. Be careful where you’re going because you’re looking for something now, but you want to look at the long-term effects on that depending on what your goals are.

 

Tony:  Tim Ferris wrote about the Four-Hour Body, which is obviously such a famous book in the diet space, and he talked about a cheat date, didn’t he, where he would just go out and eat absolutely anything. Is it fair to say that even Tim Ferris himself might offer slightly different advice now?

 

Dave:  Tim can speak for himself. He is putting Brain Octane oil in his tea and coffee when he was on the podcast he was talking about he’s putting better in his coffee and he’s doing more cyclical ketogenic stuff, which he’s written about. That was one of the diets he talked about, it was one of the more extreme diets in his book, the Four-Hour Body. I’ve emailed him pretty regularly, and I have great respect for him. I also think he just had Lyme disease, which he was pretty public about, and that also can affect your mitochondrial function, and it affects your body’s desire for fat and the amount of neurotoxins that are still circulating. I imagine that he will modulate and change his program over time for him.

 

I know lots of people who really benefit on the low-carb diet. There’s nothing wrong with it if it works for you, and that’s the biggest thing about biohacking. When I saw that I was like, “Beans? why would you choose beans for core density? that’s why white rice is there because white rice has less crap in it.” The Bulletproof perspective is avoid the things that cost you and don’t provide any benefit, and that’s why on a cheat day … I used to do cheat days back in 1997, ‘98 when I was really trying to lose weight. I was like, “I’ll do this Atkins thing.” The problem with cheat days is they cause cravings for four days afterwards. I don’t want to deal with cravings. I have stuff to do, cravings take energy away from you and I have no desire to ever feel a craving again, and if I do it’s my fault. I did something to cause the craving either I know what it is or didn’t. I can tell you, if I went out and did a cheat day like that, my performance is going to suffer and I’m gonna have lots of cravings. I think that’s true for most people unless they’re young, exercising all the time, getting lots of sleep, and super healthy. When they hit 30, and when they hit 40, the cheat days become more and more expensive, and the recovery from the cheat day is an expensive thing.

 

I recommend something kind of similar. You have a high ketosis but you don’t intentionally ingest margarine, gluten, and all sorts of other MSG, whatever fake colored candy sprinkles in your ice cream those things actually have no benefit, there’s no reason to put this in your body. The opposing argument there is, “Yeah, but people like this, so not having to be strict this makes it easier so people will have more willpower.” My will power equation is it’s a limited thing, and cravings suckle power more than anything else so I will do everything in my life to eliminate craving.

 

I would say read Tim’s book, it’s a really good book. I’ve read it and there’s all kinds of good information in there especially bodybuilding, putting on weight, high-intensity kettlebells, you want to swim a lot, total immersion. There’s all kinds of good stuff in there, it’s just different approaches and he does write about cyclical ketosis, which is the basis. It’s like a low toxin cyclical ketogenic diet is what the Bulletproof diet is.

 

Tony:  Good. Who have got?

 

Abby:  Hi. My name is Abby. I have …

 

Tony:  Okay. Abby has been on the Bulletproof Diet for a year and finds at times you plateau a little bit. What would Dave recommend for pushing through the plateau?

 

Dave:  If you are plateauing one of the things that I didn’t write about in the book that’s really helpful, is an actual real fast where …

 

Tony:  Please don’t hold the speaker like that.

 

Dave:  No, it wasn’t that. It was starting to do the reverb thing where it was resonating with power, and was going to be bad.

 

A full fast of 24 or 36 hours. You take it easy, you want to do it on a Saturday when you’re not working and things like that, that can sometimes be really amazing. It’s hard at first if you’ve never done it, but that can help. If you’re in recovery from something or you’re super tired and getting over being sick, don’t do it. For women, it matters where you are in your cycle when you do that. You don’t want to be super bloated, and swollen, and cranky because that’s not a good time to fast.

 

Tony:  Great who else? Hello, what’s your name?

 

Monica:           Hi. My name is Monica. I’ve watched your documentary Moldy. Do you have any tips …

 

Tony:  Monica has watched the documents Moldy and is looking for tips on how she can clear her house of mold herself without calling in the pros.

 

Dave:  If you can figure out how to remove mold from your house without calling the pros you will be a very very wealthy person. It is difficult. You can buy commercial grade ozone generators that can break down some of the toxins, but you need to know what’s in your house and you need to do a before and after test. I use Homebiotic, the natural bacteria that comes from soil that competes with mold, and I spread that around my house as more of a preventative thing. I just had a big leak, up on Vancouver Island my ice bath overflowed. Happens to all of us, right? It went under the floor, it was really bad. I pulled out some of the floor tiles, put in big fans and misted a gallon of Homebiotic, which is way more than any sane person needed to use. I dried it out, though, very quickly so I didn’t get any mold. If I did have mold, I would want to physically remove the mold. What I would do is you bring in contractors, you scrape it, and you don’t want to be the one doing that if you having symptoms.

 

When we filmed Moldy, the documentary, the whole camera crew and I put on these spacesuits, tie back everything, duct tape for wrists, respirators, and goggles, and Kenny hoods, and all that kind of stuff. Even the camera crew who weren’t particularly sensitive were completely zombified. They were like, “We didn’t believe you until today.”

 

We went into this really badly water damaged house, and you see the footage where I’m pulling off perfectly normal looking drywall and on the back of it is black slime. You can’t see it, is the problem, but you can measure it in the air. The first thing to do is actually determined that it really is a problem by measuring the air and work with an inspector to tell you how big of a problem you have. If it’s a small thing you might be able to do it, but it’s hard to do.

 

I would look at things like ozone and natural cultures to approach it. I don’t think you’re likely to get all the way well. One of the guys in the documentary, his house had been hit by one of the hurricanes. He was in the medical profession, and he hadn’t taken out the drywall in his basement. He was like, “We had the house remediated,” and I’m like, “I’m not walking into that house, sorry. I will feel like absolute crap,” but my producer, Kiki, she didn’t know she was mold sensitive when we started filming the movie, I was kind of guessing that. She walked into the basement to look at it, and she came out and she had a full-blown panic attack. As in curled into a ball like, “I don’t know what’s happening but I feel like I’m dying,” and, literally, I just hold her while she twitched. That’s not an uncommon response when someone who’s been exposed before goes into a moldy building because your biology is like, “Oh my God, there’s something in here that’s going to kill me. I don’t know what it is,” but you feel it. That guy was not well. He was not well because he didn’t remediate it right. This is one of those things where often times the best way to remediate something is arson.

 

Tony:  We’ve got time for a couple of more questions. Chap in the black T-shirt, and then will come to the guy in the front with a red shirt.

 

Tim:    Hi Dave. My name is Tim and I wanted to ask what is your opinion on hacking …

 

Tony:  Tim wants to know about hacking your gut bacteria.

 

Dave:  I have spent probably $100,000 on gut bacteria. I took pig whipworm eggs about 10 years ago, which is one of the more aggressive ways of hacking the bacteria. In fact two weeks ago I took some rat tapeworm larva. I’ve been doing those for the past six weeks or so. I just did a podcast with Dr. Sid Baker about that, they’re delicious, a little crunchy. Just kidding. They’re invisible, just tastes like saltwater.

 

There are things you can do, the vast majority of them don’t stick is the problem. You’ll get some benefits from saccharomyces boulardii, which is a kind of yeast that eats candida as a fuel source, that works for most people. Some of the soil-based organisms can work, Primal Defense, cryptococcus, there are some species of clostridia that actually fight clostridium difficile, that can make a difference. The problem is that so much of the time, especially when you have an overgrowth in parts of the gut called SIBO, you’re just not going to get what you want. Most of the things that are commonly recommended like, “Oh, eat yogurt,” lacto bacilli can actually cause a histamine response. I wrote a blog post, if you’re interested in the gut you have to read it, it’s called Why Yogurt Makes You Fat and Foggy. I’m like, “Here’s the species in yogurt, here’s the studies that show what those species do.”

 

The problem is you have not a lot of knowledge of what’s in your gut, and you have, within 24 hours of taking a test of what’s in your gut, it will shift depending on what you eat. If you don’t have an overgrowth in your small intestine, you would want to eat more prebiotic’s. If you do have an overgrowth, you don’t eat zero fermentable carbohydrates whatsoever, and maybe even take an antibiotic that’s not metabolized to kill things and then rebuild them. It’s very customized, but the one thing that I do know is very important is that the family, you can’t supplement those but they grow when you feed them polyphenols. It’s one of the reasons that brightly colored vegetables, and dark leafy greens, and blueberries … What are the other two big polyphenol sources?

 

Tony:  Chocolate and coffee.

 

Dave:  Those feed as probiotics, those kinds of bacteria. Soluble fiber is important. Turns out coffee has about a gram, you want to have 2g of soluble fiber in a normal sized cup of coffee and that’s actually a meaningful amount of it, especially when it comes dozed with polyphenols. People don’t generally recognize that. When you combine it with fat, like butter and Brain Octane, those are suppressive of bacteria in the gut, but if they suppress everything and then you feed it you’ll shift the ratio. I’ve seen a few results and things like that that show that effect happening, but not enough that I can guarantee it. These are mouse studies results that I’m talking about. Someone actually tested butter and coffee in mice in China. Cool.

 

Luca:   Dave, you talk about technology hacks, I think you said 40 Years of Zen is probably …

 

Tony:  Luca asking about technology hacks. What are the best ones, apart from 40 Years of Zen, and what’s coming up in the future? what can we expect? Technology and health innovation is moving so fast, isn’t it?

 

Dave:  It’s amazing. Both innovation is happening, and our ability to change our environment is remarkable. In about ‘96 I was following all of these crazy brain hacking groups on Yahoo Groups, if they even still exist, I don’t know. This guy figured out that if you shine in infrared LED, this is one of the first infrared LEDs ever made, it’ll go into the brain and it’ll turn on mitochondria in a very meaningful way. I bought this device, it was handmade in a pill bottle, and he was like, “Don’t use it for more than two minutes because you might cook your brain.” He had had such profound effects that over the six months when he was marketing this as a homebrew thing, he actually turned his brain on to things like, “I’m done. I’m going to med school now.” Completely changed his life.

 

For years this was one of my most precious biohacking tools because it made my brain turned back on. Let me just tell you really quick, this is a fricking infrared LED for 20 cents. I put it over the language processing part of my brain because, unlike Tim Ferris and speaks like 15,000 languages and learns them in five minutes, I actually don’t process sound the way most people do. This is probably something that’s from just the way my brain formed in the womb, something with the brainstem. I process sounds one level up in my brain compared to most of you so you filter sounds out better than I do, it takes you less effort than it does for me. When my wife speaks Swedish or French, I hear, “blah blah blah,” and I try and pronounce the words back and I don’t say the same words they say to me. I genuinely don’t hear it so it’s really hard. I’m like, “All right, I’m going to hack that,” so I put the thing here and shine it for two minutes. For the next six hours, I spoke in garblish. I couldn’t put my words together. I tried to speak and other strange sounds would come out of my mouth. It’s a 20 cent piece of technology, maybe two bucks with a heat sink and a power supply. That’s interesting.

 

there’s a whole new wave of light based technologies coming out. There’s stuff around ultraviolet B, which has been filtered out of like these windows filter out UVB. In fact, none of us receive ultraviolet B, but if you listen to my podcast with Stephanie Seneff, we need ultraviolet B to activate vitamin D to get vitamin D sulfate, and UVB has a direct effect on our mitochondria, it’s part of our hormone signaling system. Infrared light is also important for that. You’re going to see huge innovations in specific frequencies of light and what they do to the body. In fact, when I introduce the new stuff, I’ve got some new things coming out around that that are really cool, but there’s a wave of innovation that no one’s ever even imagined because we couldn’t do it even five years ago. It’s all LED and laser-based.

 

Tony:  I used one of those devices that shines light into your ears to get over jet lag. Have you use that?

 

Dave:  The human charger?

 

Tony:  The human charger. Not really. I stayed up slightly later but I still woke up early the next morning.

 

Dave:  It’s a cool idea. There is a nerve there, and the nerves are light-sensitive. I’ve used a laser on a nerve in the ear and on the trigeminal nerve that seemed to work, but I know people who love the human charger.

 

the one that I found was more effective for me for just activating the brain was actually a nasal light. The human charger was dorky enough on an airplane, try sticking a flashlight up your nose. Actually, they’re designed for it, they have a little clip here, and there’s infrared and Ruby one, and those shine just on the base of the brain going up through the very thin part of the skull back there, so I think there are ways to get light into the brain and that could be a good way to do it. There’s debate in the community. Whenever you innovate, there’s always going to be these professional skeptics and haters who make up a bunch of crap, and sometimes they’re right, but if their gut response is immediate skepticism, they’re just like fundamentalist people. They’re not going to think, they’re the people who always say no, and I tend to respond to them the way I respond to my two-year-old, who also always has no, you’re like, “Good for you,” and then you go about your business.

 

Tony:  We have time for one more question. Who’s got a really good question? No pressure. You seem confident.

 

Christian:       It’s a good sciencey kind of …

 

Tony:  Science. We might have one afterward.

 

Christian:       My name’s Christian and I was wondering to get back to the APOE4 issue ….

 

Tony:  This is a really good question from Christian, by the way, guys. It’s going in-depth with fat again coming back to that and how we deal with it and process it.

 

Dave:  There’s a supposition that if you have APOE4 and you have any kind of saturated fat, the LDL particles will go out. That is not a true statement. Saturated fat includes C8 and C10 oils which are, technically, saturated but do not behave like saturated fats unlike the other MCT oils that are saturated and do behave like long chain fats. That’s one of the reasons I recommend the stuff that I do versus MCT which includes some things that behave like long chain fats. What I think you mean is if you eat a long chain saturated fat, the LDL particle count will go up. If those go up, but your HDL also goes up, your triglycerides drop, your homocysteine drops, your LPPLA drops, and your C-Reactive protein drops, does that not play into the overall risky equation that we get from looking at LDL-C? it does because if the LDL-C is damaging arteries, by definition, you’ll have an enzyme, Lp-PLA2, is the enzyme that will be expressed from the damaging of your arteries.

 

If you’re worried about that, and I know some people who are very focused on that, look for Lp-PLA2. If you have damage, you have damage. If you have high LDL and you don’t have damage … Did you know high LDL makes it easier to put on muscles? It makes you more resilient to certain kinds of poisoning, there are actually benefits to LDL. It’s not a bad thing as long as there is an inflammation and damage, so show me the evidence. If you have the APOE4, you have high LDL, show me that it’s causing damage then you need to change.

 

Tony:  Good stuff. Thank you, Christian. One more. Who have we got? Hello.

 

Jenny: I have a nine-month-old baby …

 

Tony:  Jenny. Just to repeat the question for everybody listening and everyone here, you’ve got two kids under the age of three and you’re wondering what to feed them for breakfast and what the levels of protein and fat and carbs and everything else should be.

 

Dave:  Kids benefit from a few more carbs than adults. I don’t give my kids carbs, I don’t give them any carbs in the morning especially fruit because it turns them into whiny, crankypants. They get protein and fat in the morning, and cucumber if they want some veggies. At lunch, they may or may not have Bulletproof style carbs, not sugary things. Than at dinner, there is usually carbs. Timing seems to matter, and this really affects their behavior. They each to get an espresso cup full of Bulletproof coffee made with lots of Brain Octane and some collagen, and that really helps them stay calm and focused because their little meat operating systems which say, “Eat everything, especially if it’s sugar,” they shut the hell up and then the kids can focus on being kids and playing and not hitting each other and things like that. That’s a big benefit.

 

for variety, avocados can be really good, and there’s a ton of things you can do with vegetables and you really want to work vegetables in. If it’s fats, good but the prototype meal for the Bulletproof Diet is cover a plate and vegetables, add a moderate amount of high-quality protein from animals, and then cover it in fat. If you skip the veggies, it doesn’t work as well. If your kids … The magic is steam the veggies, take a third of the veggies, toss them in the blender, butter, Brain Octane, collagen if you want, a little bit of vinegar and some spices, whatever you want want to teach them to like later in life, and some salt. Blend the crap out of it until it’s creamy and really good, and then spoon it back over the veggies. Even kids who don’t eat vegetables that come to visit our house, they take one bite of that and they’re like, “Give me more.” That becomes one of the primary things on their plate, and then you can add in whatever the protein is. You’ll find that kids thrive on that because they get way more fat in that way, and it gets them to get their veggies in every day.

 

Jenny: You would do that for breakfast too, then?

 

Dave:  Absolutely. Especially if you’re running out a variety.

 

Jenny: You wouldn’t feed porridge? What I’ve done sometimes when I have that

 

Dave:  If you’re doing porridge, I would definitely include fat. Kids don’t do too well on straight carbs. I’m a fan of the rice porridge is versus the oatmeal ones. There are lots of problems with oatmeal, but if it really works for you and for your kids, oatmeal is fine just get organic. It’s really important, especially it’s not grown here. American oats are terrible.

 

Jenny: Ideally I should move away from that?

 

Dave:  Yeah. By the way, my kids eat mochi, white puffed rice, you bake it. It’s interesting if you made porridge or rice, and you refrigerate it, it forms a lot of resistant starch. It’s one of the reasons sushi is good, you get a lot of resistant starch in cooked and cooled rice. The same also with porridge, if you cook and cool it, it totally changes the amount of beneficial probiotic starch in there, prebiotic starch, so that’s a neat trick.

 

Tony:  Awesome. Dave, this has been fantastic thank you so much. It’s been brilliant. Thank you all for coming. The podcast will be published this weekend. Give it up for Dave Asprey. Thank you very much.

 

[/expand]

Taking on the USDA One Penny at a Time with Gunnar Lovelace – #323

Why you should listen –

Gunnar Lovelace is a serial entrepreneur in nonprofits, technology, fashion and real estate. Most recently he is the founder and co-CEO of Thrive Market, an online wholesale buying club on a mission to make healthy living easy and affordable for every American family. On this episode of Bulletproof Radio, Dave and Gunnar talk about food co-ops, marketing healthy food, food politics, the grocery supply chain, the power of your vote, McDonalds and more. Enjoy the show!

Today’s episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. To claim your 30-day free trial, go to www.freshbooks.com/bulletproof and enter “Bulletproof Radio” in the “How You Heard About Us” section.

 

Bulletproof Executive Radio at the iTunes, App Store, iBookstore, and Mac App Store
Watch

Listen

Follow Along with the Transcript!

[expand title=”CLICK HERE to read along with the transcript!” swaptitle=”Click to hide transcript”]

Click here to download a PDF of this transcript

Speaker 1:      Bulletproof Radio: a state of high performance.

 

Dave:  Hey, it’s Dave Asprey at Bulletproof Radio. Today’s cool fact of the day is that more than 17.4 million Americans are food insecure. It means they have limited access to adequate food and nutrition because of price or geography and only about 6.9 million Americans are food secure. Those come from a real data source, but I got to wonder, what about the other people who are not food insecure and food secure? Because we have like 300 million people and we only have 6.9 and 17.4. There must be a big middle of people that are foodish insecureish, but whatever it is, there are giant numbers of people who live nowhere near a grocery store that even has fresh vegetables. Seeing an apple versus a can of applesauce is a rare occurrence. That’s pretty scary.

 

If you haven’t heard about FreshBooks yet, listen up. These folks are on a serious mission to help small business owners save time and avoid a lot of the stress that comes with running a business. As a business owner, it’s really important to be able to see everything. Which clients still owe you, which invoices have been paid, and how your business is doing right now on the dashboard and you get that from FreshBooks. Using FreshBooks, you can take about 30 seconds to create and send an invoice and you get paid online because FreshBooks gives your clients tons of ways they can just pay you with credit cards or other ways which can seriously improve how quickly you get paid. In fact, customers get paid five days faster on average. FreshBooks is offering 30 days of unrestricted use to all Bulletproof listeners totally free right now and you don’t need a credit card to sign up. To claim your 30-day free trial, go to FreshBooks.com/Bulletproof and enter ‘Bulletproof Radio’ in the ‘How You Heard About Us’ section.

 

Before we get going on today’s episode, if you haven’t had a chance to check out Bulletproof: The Cookbook, it’s time. This has been a phenomenally successful book. It just came out and it’s got 125 Bulletproof recipes using tons of really, really good ingredients that support your biological function, that support your performance every day. There are amazing desserts, desserts I have served at Yahoo’s headquarters recently. There are just amazing meals. Cauliflower bacon mash is one of my favorites. You’ll find some amazing good stuff in there. Check it out. You can buy it on the Bulletproof website. You can buy it on Amazon. You can buy it on Barnes , Noble. Wherever books are sold.

 

Today’s guest is Gunnar Lovelace, who’s a social goods serial entrepreneur who founded Love Heals, a conscious jewelry company that funded the planting of one and a half million trees and sponsored 500,000 malnourished children. He’s currently the co-CEO of Thrive Market, which is an online wholesale buying club who’s mission is to make natural and organic eating more affordable for everyone. He’s also a bio-activist.

 

Gunnar, welcome to the show.

 

Gunnar:          Hey, it’s great to be here. Love your work and excited to be on the show.

 

Dave:  Likewise. We’ve had a chance to meet in person lots of times and we’re supporters of each other’s companies so it’s an honor to get to have you on the show. Your story is pretty unique. It’s one of the reasons I wanted to have you on is you’re a high-performance entrepreneur and I want to pick your brain about what you’re doing with your mission for healthy food and I also want to pick your brain about what you do for your own biology to support it. Two directions that our listeners would be interested in.

 

Gunnar:          Put me to work. I’m at your service.

 

Dave:  All right. One of the things that surely affects your decision to start Thrive Markets is that you were raised by a single Latino mom. You lived here illegally in the U.S. for eight years.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah.

 

Dave:  Your mom wanted to feed really healthy as well as she could, but let’s face it. No matter where you are food costs money, right? Healthy food costs more money right now so when you were a kid you maybe didn’t have enough of that. Did that shape your view of the world? Did that shape why you decided to start Thrive? Why you feed 50,000 people?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, absolutely. It’s growing up really poor and seeing how she struggled to make healthy choices was a primary impulse for me in why we started the business. There were months at a time where we lived off of rice because that’s all we could afford. It’s been a life-long interest of mine. One of the things that I was really fortunate with was that in spite of our financial adversity, my mother was well educated so she did know that eating healthy was really important so she made a lot of choices that prioritized that opportunity, even though she was struggling financially.

 

When she remarried, my stepfather was running a food co-op, which we still run today. We got exposed to a group-buying model through a food co-op and that was really how the genesis of Thrive came about was seeing a 21st Century … How do we build a 21st Century co-op?

 

Dave:  I think there are probably a good number of people listening right now who don’t actually know what a food co-op is. If you grew up granola, you know and if you didn’t, you might’ve never been in one or if you’ve been in one, you just thought it was a grocery store. Can you walk me through what is the difference between a food co-op and a hippie grocery store?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, so a food co-op is a membership store out of a retail location where people pay an annual membership fee to be able to access … Typically, they get some kind of discounted pricing when they make purchases at the health food store. They typically run as a hybrid health food store/membership community. People that are members get slightly better pricing. For me, when I’ve thought about health and wellness, and I think you guys see this the same way is how do we strip out the hippie-ness but keep the heart and soul so that we can reach millions of new Americans that want to access healthy living for the first time. I think that’s our mission as a business is to really transcend the ideologies and really reach people everywhere. But having that personal experience growing up with a food co-op and seeing the impact it had with building community with people and making it more affordable for people. I almost felt like there’s got to be a way to do something like that online for the 21st Century.

 

Dave:  It’s really a tough situation when … I look back at what happened when I was a kid that helped me to form why I’m doing Bulletproof. For me, my parents also wanted me to eat healthy. We weren’t desperately poor by a long shot. We weren’t stupendously wealthy either. I would say just middle class, but for me that meant liquid squeeze margarine and low-fat Grape-Nuts and all sorts of just horrible crap that was toxic for my biology. Today now we still have this idea where okay, I’m going to “eat healthy” and you seem like you’re pretty fortunate. Your mom had financial limited resources, but she had some reasonable knowledge where she actually succeeded in feeding you healthy, maybe because she was feeding you more the way her parents ate and less the way whatever the current magazine of the 1980’s told you to eat, which was desperately wrong in almost every direction.

 

For me, I’m like all right I was a beast as a teenager. I have stretchmarks till that I haven’t figured out how to hack. Grew up with all sorts of autoimmune things, just issue that were caused by these things. I’m like, “All right, I want to do this right,” and that’s one of the things for me. It’s not that hard when you get the rules right.

 

For you, you’re like it’s not that expensive when you get the rules right, but how do you use your business to help people eat the right stuff versus just stuff that’s labeled as healthy?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, I think that’s the big important question. I wouldn’t claim to have an exactly right answer to that. I think it’s an ongoing evolving question that gets answered a lot of different ways to different communities. I think for us the way we’ve constructed our model is that instead of making the traditional retail markup that people pay when they go to a health food store, we pass all of those savings along to our members through $60 a year and it’s like Whole Foods meets Costco. For every paid membership, we give a membership away to a family in need. If you can’t afford the $60 to get access to wholesale prices to have healthy products shipped to your home wherever you are, you can still get a free membership through our giving program. That’s one way we do it.

 

We also invest in educational content so we just shot a video course with 22 videos which is like, how to read a label, how do carbs turn into sugar, and why you should care about toxic ingredients in your cleaning supplies, and just basic stuff that you and I know and most of the listeners know, but Americans, a lot of people just don’t know this information. Education, when we think about access and making healthy living accessible to everybody, we see it as a function of price, geography, and education. Selling previously premium products for less, geography in that we ship it to people wherever they are, if they’re in a food desert, and then education in terms of providing content that helps people understand why they should care about these issues and doing it in a way that informs and inspires them.

 

I think to your lead-in on the fact, there’s 43 million Americans on food stamps, as an example. The largest source of calories for them is soda. We know what that’s doing to their bodies.

 

Dave:  Maybe it’s diet soda. They don’t even get calories for it and it does worse things to their bodies like … Man, that’s a losing proposition in every way, right?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, exactly.

 

Dave:  All right. Let me ask a hard question. I don’t know the answer to this because I haven’t dug around on the Thrive website. Do you guys sell anything with sucralose in it?

 

Gunnar:          I don’t think we do.

 

Dave:  Would you?

 

Gunnar:          No. No. I’m going to go dig around myself.

 

Dave:  Okay.

 

Gunnar:          4,000 products, it’s hard to vet everything personally, but I’ll definitely check on that. We have a very, very stringent guidelines. We’re the largest retail in the country that sells only non-GMO foods at this point.

 

Dave:  That was my next question. What’s your deal? So no GMO. What about canola oil? Do you allow that?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, there’s canola oil. Yeah, yeah. It’s non-GMO.

 

Dave:  It’s such a slippery slope, right?

 

Gunnar:          I know. I know. I know. The thing is, so the way we approached it is we’ve … Instead of trying to be the most outrageous puritans, we’ve really taken a big tent approach. That means that people are going to buy healthy, healthier marshmallows and that’s what’s going to motivate them to get into the ecosystem, we’ll choose to sell some marshmallows that are not filled with toxins and preservatives. Obviously there’s sugary content. Then we have an opportunity to be able to have a larger conversation with them. That isn’t necessarily the right decision, but it is one strategy.

 

Dave:  My kids love s’mores. There’s a fire pit right behind the camera here. We built it. The kids absolutely know how to roast marshmallows. Are they allowed to eat ten of them? No. Do they get two organic marshmallows with the Bulletproof chocolate? I put it on a Mary’s Gone cracker. You guys probably sell Mary’s crackers, right?

 

Gunnar:          Oh, yeah.

 

Dave:  There you go. Actually don’t really like the Mary’s cracker taste, but they’re kids. That’s what a s’more is to them. They don’t know what graham crackers taste like and I’m okay with that.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  Right? That kind of perspective like, “All right, you’re going to do something that isn’t perfect, but does that mean you’re going to slather it with cyanide and glyphosate and lead and mercury and then it eat? No. You do the least harmful thing. I totally support that. That’s why the whole thing I do, it’s all in a spectrum. This is really crappy and you shouldn’t ever eat that. This is not that good for you, but you’ll probably survive and you can overcome and this is probably good for you. I totally support your big tent approach there, because honestly you’re going to eat canola oil, eat the non-GMO canola oil. It was a win for the day. You did one thing better, right?

 

Gunnar:          Right. Our shared friend, Dr. Mark Hyman, one of the great aha moments for me in this journey a couple years ago when we first met him, he was presenting at Saddleback Church, which is the largest mega-church in the country. Designed a meal plan with Pastor Rick Warren and there were thousands of people in the audience. It was syndicating live to hundreds of churches. He’s there talking about avocado cacao pudding and quinoa and coconut oil to a very mainstream conservative audience. I was just floored at how mainstream this conversation is going now. I think that’s really exciting. Health and wellness transcends ideology. It doesn’t matter who you are or where you live, what you believe, everybody wants to feel good in their bodies and everybody wants the same thing for their children. Where you and I are in the business of helping people get healthy.

 

Dave:  Now what percentage of the Thrive customer base is organic preppers?

 

Gunnar:          Organic … What?

 

Dave:  Preppers.

 

Gunnar:          Preppers?

 

Dave:  You know there’s a television show called Preppers, like people that are preparing for disaster so they’re stockpiling for the … I’m just wondering because you guys sold bulk.

 

Gunnar:          I think it’s pretty small. We actually don’t do that much bulk. It’s everyday sizes.

 

Dave:  It’s everyday sizes, but the reason I’m asking that, it’s a little bit humor, but it’s also like, “Look, most preppers tend to be relatively conservative, but it doesn’t matter.” You want organic food and if you wanted to plan to eat for a year without having to go to the grocery store, which is actually not a bad idea to be able to be prepared for that, at least several months of food for emergency supplies is prudent I would say. At least if you understand our food supply, it’s prudent. If you do decide to do that, do you want to stockpile genetically-modified corn malt and you’ll just eat that with a spoon or do you want to have good food?

 

Gunnar:          Right, totally.

 

Dave:  If you have good food, then cost becomes important and then you have to eat from what you have on hand. Then bulk buying or just cost-effect buying, it’s not even bulk, it becomes terribly important. I imagine that you have some people there, but like you said, it transcends all ideologies so it doesn’t matter if you’re doing it because you want to be gentle to Mother Earth or because you think an apocalypse is coming, you still want food that makes you feel good, right? That’s why everyone cares about it.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, it plays to people’s self interests in such a powerful way and as we know, it benefits them, their communities, the economy with $300 billion a year spent on lifestyle diseases like diabetes every year and the environment, shifting from toxic conventional supply chains to organic and regenerative. I think it’s a … For me it’s such a gratifying organizing principle to be part of and I’m grateful to be collaborating with you on it.

 

Dave:  Talk to me a little bit about what you do to support farmers. How does Thrive work with the supply chain? I’m really interested in how you do that. What kind of farms do you work with and what’s your relationship there with the food producers themselves?

 

Gunnar:          We’re just starting to get into that, but we’re doing a push into private label on products where we lose money but we now have to provide them to our community or we have low margins. For example, coconut oil. That’s an area where we needed to get more margin on the product. We went to our primary partner and he’s got a fantastic Fair Trade ethical supply chain in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia. We were very, very careful about looking at their supply chain and then we really tell that story to our community. What’s happening now is that consumers are waking up to the fact that they want to vote with their dollars and they really value transparency. Yes, they want to get great products at a great price, but they also want to believe and support in things that align with their values. Our ability to do the work and really make sure that we’re working with ethical supply chains and then be able to share the details of that with our community creates a level of resonance and education that’s differentiated than a traditional retail environment.

 

Dave:  I think that’s really important. I read some things about regenerative farming and carbon farming. Are you doing specific things to support products that come from carbon neutral farming?

 

Gunnar:          That’s a new … The whole regenerative farming movement in general is amazing and a lot of studies coming out showing it’s the fastest way to sequester carbon and produce truly nutrient-dense food, create great jobs. I’m on the board of a local regenerative agriculture non-profit and help raise the money for them. I think it’s a really exciting area for the American economy in general for all the reason I listed. It’s very, very new in terms of the supply chain and so farmers are just starting to … There’s all questions about how do they do labeling and standards.

 

There’s not a lot that we’ve been able to do around that actually in our supply chain but we’re having those conversations every week, every month with our partners, our co-packers, our vendors, and really working to encourage them either to move toward those practices or selecting vendors where they can handle the scale of volume that we need. Part of the challenge is you can get really small farmers that can handle a small amount of volume, but because we’re selling 20,000 to 50,000 units per month now, the level of volume that we need in a partner is differentiated. That’s part of the cart/horse issue. We’re excited about investing in farms long term to really make that a whole picture.

 

Dave:  I saw an interview with the head buyer for Wal-Mart a while back. This was maybe four years ago. Whoever it was, I don’t remember the person’s name or even whether it was a man or woman. It was a thing I read. They said, “Look, I would love to put organic cotton in every product sold at Wal-Mart. There’s just this little problem. There isn’t that much organic cotton produced on the surface of the planet. If we had access to every piece of organic cotton, we couldn’t do it so we don’t do it.”

 

Gunnar:          That’s right.

 

Dave:  Are you going to run into that scale? Where yeah, everyone wants organic blueberries, but there just aren’t enough organic blueberries.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, we already deal with it. Actually one of the things that I’ve been thinking about is that there’s a need for a transition label. The challenge with organic certification is it’s a three-year process. It’s really expensive and it’s really impacting our ability to meet the demand. Now we’re forced, as an economy, the import massive amounts of organic produce and food from countries like China and South America, which you got the whole carbon impact of shipping that and all the supply, other types of supply chains. I think there’s a real opportunity for us to come up with another label that it doesn’t mean … You’re not applying chemicals or fertilizers to it and it has the same guidelines as organic, but people know it’s a transitional label.

 

Dave:  It’s really tough. The plantations that I work with for the Bulletproof coffee beans, they’ve never been sprayed, never will be sprayed. They’ve been owned by the same families for a long time. It would take more than one year’s worth of profits to pay for the organic certification.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  For small farmers, organic certification is … You have to have a separate job in order to do it. My small farm where I live, I’m on 32 acres and we’re putting into production for the first time. It’s relatively simple to get organic certification because it hasn’t been productive farmland, but even then I almost put asphalt paving on the road coming in, which would have killed my organic certification. How many places don’t have asphalt roads? Well, that would’ve … Because there’s a petroleum thing that’s involve with that.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  Now I have a dirt driveway still. I don’t know. Maybe we’ll put gravel on it. These little things, people eat food. Ah, it’s organic or it’s not organic, but oh, it’s organic from China. We have no idea whether those were enforced in China and Mexico. We have no idea how long that food sat, how fresh it is, but at least it was organic. I fully support that. This is at least small-farmer based, non-GMO. There’s a variety of things. What you get down to is farming’s a system. It’s a whole set of practices with thousands of decision points. How do you know that the majority of them were done in such a way to support the world and support the people who eat the food? That is a tough standard to make and to enforce. I support that effort, but it’s going to take a while.

 

Gunnar:          I think it will, but I think there’s a real opportunity there. I think it could be done in a thoughtful way that would make really expand access and production pretty quickly.

 

Dave:  Where I live, up here on Vancouver Island, I’ve seen a few of the local grocery stores actually purchasing farmland where they’re going either into partnership or just outright purchasing it and saying, “Look, we need access to high-quality organic local vegetable. We’ve got to guarantee access. We’re serving our communities. Buying from a farmer doesn’t guarantee that we’ll have what we want so we might as well just do this.” Are you going to buy a bunch of farmland, employ a bunch of farmers, and basically be a vertically integrated thing?

 

Gunnar:          It’s funny. I was just talking to some of our investors yesterday about that. For us, it’s a sequencing issue. There’s a very real likelihood in the next two or three years we’ll end up vertically integrating and then building really showcase regenerative farms.

 

Dave:  Yeah, I’m considering the same thing with coffee because I would want to work with the people I work with now, but I just want to make sure that everything is done right. Right now, I know that because I have my lab testing at the end of the process, but if there was an opportunity to partner more with the growers or to even work directly with a plantation for long term, like, “Look, if your name’s going to go on the label, it better be done right and not just mostly right either.”

 

Gunnar:          The majors are doing this. I just saw an article yesterday. Costco just helped a farmer in San Diego buy 1,200 acres across the border in Mexico to launch a big organic farm. Costco funded it precisely for this issue. It’s one of the fastest growing segments of Costco’s business is organic food and they have the same issue. They’re at enormous, enormous scale and they can’t get their hands on the product. This is a problem now that’s systemic. The good news is it creates demand and there is a bottleneck with the certification process, but the market is going to have its effect and there’s going to be a lot of solutions that come up in the next five to ten years that meet that demand.

 

Dave:  It’ll be really interesting too though like what happens, let’s say, with a membership model like Costco or with Thrive, let’s say. Let’s put on our futurist hat. In ten years from now, Thrive is the ginormous multi-billion dollar thing and let’s say you have access … We’ll say control of 10% of America’s cropland.

 

Gunnar:          That’s a big number, but okay I’m going to play with you on that.

 

Dave:  Okay. I’m just making up these numbers. Let’s say a meaningful percentage of this stuff. It’s very different in a world like that. Let’s say Wal-Mart has this slice. Costco has this slice. Thrive has this slice. Safeway has this slice and whatever. Amazon has this other slice. Who knows what the future looks like, but essentially there’s a series of big companies, some nicer than others, who are now vertically integrating into this thing. What happens with the control of the food supply then with things like small farmers? Where do they fit into that ecosystem? What do you think will happen with vertical integration? What’s the best model for that when you think about this going out more than five years.

 

Gunnar:          I don’t think we have to own farms specifically. I think that there’s way for us to be supportive to farmers in a way that gives us the stability and guarantee of output while not being intensely hierarchical that’s destructive to small farmers. Even like on the regenerative agriculture piece, one of the things that I’ve been talking about with the board there is we need to create free educational tool kits that are turnkey for farmers that depend upon one of the seven major bio-zones that you would have in the U.S. and you could just follow these free, turnkey programs how to convert your farm into a regenerative farm. It gives people step-by-step educational content that helps them do that. I think there’s a lot of ways that we can be very beneficial in the ecosystem, particularly as we get scale and the amount of money it takes for us to have a tremendous impact for people starts to be a smaller part of our overall revenue base. I think we’re going to be able to leverage that in really dynamic ways.

 

Dave:  Some of the things that a lot of people don’t know, I saw this shocking statistic like 90% of small farmers have a day job. They cannot put food on their table by farming. They can put … Actually, that’s not true. They can put food on their table. They just can’t put money in their bank account with small farming, even if they go to the local farmers’ market on weekends and all that. They’re not quite making ends meet. The amount of work, oh my God. Some of our family friends, they’re on five-acre farm, which is plenty big enough to grow way more food than you could ever eat in a fertile valley like where we live. Even with feeding a couple cows and raising everything, it’s just 16 hour a day, just huge amounts of labor and at the end of the day, by the time you’ve paid for animal food and you did all that stuff, it’s like break even. To the point they’re thinking about shutting the farm down because they just can’t do it.

 

I think most people would say, “Oh, I’m supporting small farmers,” and they go to the farmers’ market and they try to negotiate for a dollar off. That might’ve been the only dollar of profit that was out there.

 

Gunnar:          Right, right.

 

Dave:  Do you think that Thrive and what you’re doing with Thrive might have the power to change that? To make it easier or make it more profitable? With these tool sets?

 

Gunnar:          The beautiful thing about our model is that we cut out all the middlemen in the supply chain, right? That allows us to work with partners where they can actually make more money working with us. It’s simpler. It’s easier. We can tell their story in a really beautiful way with our content and recipes and videos, talk about their supply chain, and they can make more money and still pass savings along to our members. When you think about a traditional supply chain, there’s the grower, the manufacturer, the brokers, the distributors, the slotting fees, the retail games, the pay to play, all the stuff that happens in shelf space and pay-to0play games and by being able to cut all of that out and go direct to consumer to our members with a really efficient supply chain, we’re actually able to pay more to our partners and pass the savings along to our members. It’s a win/win/win for everybody.

 

Dave:  Most people listening to this don’t know about the incredibly complex and Byzantine grocery supply chain. If a product costs $1 at the register, can you walk through who gets what percentage of that dollar for the average product that you might sell on Thrive?

 

Gunnar:          It really depends on the product and the product category. Let’s say something costs $10 because that’s an easier one to …

 

Dave:  Sure.

 

Gunnar:          If it’s $10, the actual brand that actually manufactures that, not even the farmer, but just the brand, depending upon the margin and what type of product they’re selling, they’ll be lucky if they $3 to $5 of that $10 that’s sold at retail. Then the rest of that $5 to $7 goes to the brokers, the distributors, and the retail player and all the retail pay-to-play games that happen on the shelf space.

 

Dave:  People listening to this right now, think about that number. If you spend $10, the person who manufactured and produced that product got $3 of that $10 and the rest of it went to inefficiencies in the supply chain.

 

Gunnar:          That’s right.

 

Dave:  That’s why when you go with something like eCommerce, you’re basically taking that $7 and you’re redistributing it in a different way, but on the other hand, if you go to Whole Foods and you have access to fresh stuff that you might not be able to get online and you have access to a whole suite of products that are generally hard to get in one place. It’s an interesting conundrum because what’s the cost of convenience and do you really care if the producer of that product got $3 or $4?

 

My take on that is actually you should care whether the producer gets $3 or $4 because if you’re dealing with an ethical producer, they’re going to make better products versus squeezing every last nickel out. I find there’s two types of consumers out there, at least when I’m working on the Bulletproof side. There’s what I call the mercenaries. They’re like, “I want to eat the cheapest food possible.” To that mindset, it’s almost like a victory to squeeze a nickel out of the food that they’re eating. Then there’s other people who say, “Look, I want to eat the highest quality food, first, that is most affordable, second.”

 

I’m in that category, right? I want food that makes me feel amazing. I’m willing to pay more for it, but I don’t want to pay a lot more for it but that extra value I’m getting? I’ll pay for quality and if I was starving, I wouldn’t pay for quality, except even then, if you have only a dollar to spend on this meal, you’re going to buy the highest quality meal you can get for a dollar. You’ll always do that, but when you have more than a dollar, are you willing to spend $1.10?

 

How do you differentiate between the mercenary, like I want the very, very cheapest thing possible, versus I want the best thing possible? How do you navigate that for consumers who come to Thrive? How do you guide them in that direction?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, I think for us what’s cool is again we’re big tent so we’re happy to have both those consumers. Because it’s such a disintermediated supply chain where we’ve cut out the middlemen, we can pay our brands more. We can pass along really significant savings of 25% to 50% off these products to the members and we can cover our costs so we break even on the products. That plays to self interest and whether or not you’re really, really scrounging and you’re optimizing every dollar or whether you’re interested in the lifestyle and want to vote with your dollars and you’re really interested in the absolute highest quality, you’re still … We can appeal to both of those consumers and it’s really easy for us to work with both of those.

 

We work with a lot of other types of consumers. It’s people that are in food deserts or people that aren’t near a health food store to begin with or they’re in a low-income neighborhood or they’re a community of color. There’s all sorts of … We have a lot of different demographic groups that we interact with and support and what’s cool is over half of our customer is in the South and the Midwest. Most people would think that our customer base is concentrated in California and New York. What’s really exciting for us at the business is that we’re helping people access healthy food, often for the first time because they can afford it. Our buyer, the person who’s buying from us at Thrive, by and large is a woman. She shops at Target or Kohl’s. She’s accessing healthy food often for the first time because she can afford to do it and she wants to do it, but it’s been out of her reach, historically.

 

Dave:  Yeah, that’s really helping people in a meaningful way. I applaud that. I’ve been on lots of road trips and for a long time I’ve eaten in a certain way, because when I eat stuff that maybe other people tolerate better than I do … I have a history of obesity and autoimmunity and all. This stuff kryptonite to me. I eat it, I’m going to feel awful. I don’t like to feel awful, especially when I’m driving across the country or something. There’s lots of times you’re like, in this entire state, there’s only two places where I really wanted to find something to eat and that’s not to say that I feel like I’m being persnickety or something, but you’re like, “Look, I don’t know how you possibly deep-fry a salad, but every restaurant in this town deep fries their salads, probably because they didn’t have any fresh lettuce.” I’m not joking actually. That was in Scotland, not in the U.S.

 

It’s one of those things where you realize, “Okay, this isn’t food in the way I define food, because if I eat it I’m going to feel crappy. Certainly, I’m not going to perform at my best level and that’s what I do every day.” Having a shift like this that says, “All right, even if you live in a town like that, now I can get the food that I want and it’s affordable,” that changes things in a way that having a Wal-Mart downtown won’t do, right?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, I think for us one of the benchmarks that we try to really aim our business at is can we sell healthy alternatives at the same price or less than the conventional equivalent? We sell a KIND bar for the same price or less than a Snickers bar. We sell 70 loads of non-toxic laundry detergent for less than a big box retailer will sell 70 loads of laundry detergent with hormone and endocrine disruptors. For us, when we’re look in our catalog and how do we provide products, what we’re trying to do is make the products equal in price to the conventional equivalent or less. If we can do that, that’s hyper scalable.

 

Dave:  But Gunnar, endocrine disruptors smell so fresh.

 

Gunnar:          Exactly! So fresh and clean. I saw an ad yesterday that I just … I can’t say the name obviously, but it was for one of the big CBG cleaning companies and it was an ad on a major site and it was touting as if it was a big exciting thing. It was, “Made of 90% cleaning ingredients!” Then under it says, “Keep out of reach of children.” I was just like, “What an odd ad.” To think that that’s even an effective ad to advertise that your cleaning products are made of 90% cleaning ingredients without even specifying what that even means and then have this bold warming that you got to keep the cleaning product out of reach of children. I was like, “This is completely insane.”

 

Dave:  Last time I checked water was a cleaning ingredient.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  I don’t even know what that means.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  It’s amazing what people will buy. We’ve certainly trained them that way. I want to shift gears a bit, since we’re talking about endocrine disruptors and hormones, things like that. When we’ve had dinner together, you talked about being a self-proclaimed hypochondriac. You really are monitoring what’s going on with your biology. What do you do? What do you obsess about the most? Where’d that come from?

 

Gunnar:          I think it’s like deep survival fears. Growing up really poor and we inherit some of these thought forms and patterns from our parents. My mother was very, very concerned all the time. I think we’re all confronted with our various neurotic, intellectual conditioning that we all have various flavors of it. One of mine is hypochondria. I’m gratefully much better than I used to be, but I used to just obsess about cancer and heart disease as a teenager. I would just be like … I’d feel a lump under my lymph node, I’d be like, for months completely terrified that I was finally going to die of lymphatic cancer, a 13-year old boy. That kind of …

 

Dave:  That’s true hypochondria. Okay, cool.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, yeah, yeah. Full blown. At the same time though, that led me into understanding and pursuing information about health and wellness in a powerful way and it led me to having to look at other types of interpersonal skills and development so looking at fear and what’s the root of the fear and having really honest conversation with oneself about where that arises from. It’s been both a blessing and a curse.

 

I know you can understand that one with your own journey. I think those are … We’re all confronted with those in different ways and none of us are all that unique in the fact that we all have our mixed bag of cards that make us who we are.

 

Dave:  It’s funny. I used to wonder if I was a hypochondriac, especially back in 1992, people are like, “You’re a hypochondriac.” I’m like, “Actually, no. I just feel shitty.” There’s a difference. I actually did have autoimmune stuff. I am kind of fat. Okay, it turns out there was a connection between what I ate and what I did and whether or not I got a sinus infection again or one of those things.

 

Like you said, it’s a curse, but also it means that you have a very survival-based motivation that says, “I’m going to learn about this stuff and I’m going to get it right because whether it’s perceived threat or an actual threat, I’m going to own this stuff because I don’t want to walk around with that hanging over my head.”

 

Gunnar:          I know for me and I know in your work, your work is really vulnerably and honestly sharing the depths of your personal challenges. I think that, as we move through those challenges that we’re all dealt with, we actually become better human beings as we’re able to be honest about our ability to move through these things and still be effected by them periodically. It inspires other people to confront their own challenges at a very profound level. I think I used to be overweight as a teenager too and for me it wasn’t the physiological, autoimmune stuff that you were up against. I was depressed.

 

That’s the other part of obesity and being overweight is there’s an emotional component to it. A lot of it’s the type of food we’re eating, but it’s also a lot of people feel hopeless in their lives or they’re depressed or there’s emotional issues that are unresolved. I think there’s such an amazing conversation for us to have now about these issues holistically and food and lifestyle is a critical part of it, but then also really getting access to the tools that give us a way to empower ourselves from the traditional fears and beliefs that we’ve been conditioned with.

 

Dave:  A lot of that programming you get in the first seven years, it runs in there. You think that programming is actually your personality and it’s not.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  That knowledge, that model, it isn’t taught in school. They don’t teach you that in college. You go through this whole education process and you come out of it and you’re just as programmed as you were before. Then you have to …

 

Gunnar:          Or more so.

 

Dave:  Yeah, maybe more so. Then you have to sit down and go, “All right, how am I going to deal with this?” I’ve found that for most people, you need to hit a pretty bad place in order to take a look at it. Otherwise you can live a relatively okay life fully programmed. It’s a life of mediocrity so to speak, but if you basically hit a wall along the way, you’ll probably have to look around a little bit more.

 

Gunnar:          It’s desperation, right? We get backed into a corner and we either are going to work through it or we literally won’t survive. I think a lot of people can relate to that desperation and I think that it’s one of the things that’s driving people to so passionately vote with their dollars and try to understand companies that support their values. The personal development movement. There’s so many aspects to it that I think it’s the darkest dark, the lightest light and people want to empower themselves in a way that’s truly transformational right now.

 

Dave:  You talked about voting with your dollars. We also have a presidential election. What do you think is more important for someone to do: to support organic stuff and to buy organic foods or to vote for one candidate or another?

 

Gunnar:          I think they’re both important.

 

Dave:  That was a politician’s answer. Come on, man.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, it is. It is. I actually think that ultimately I think what’s interesting is … We work with Environmental Working Group, EWG.

 

Dave:  Yeah, I’m a supporter as well.

 

Gunnar:          Ken is amazing. I heard a speech he gave and it was really interesting. In the 60’s, the government drove all sorts of amazing innovation around Clean Water Act and all sorts of things that we just take for granted today that are part of the bedrock of how we maintain and manage our society and our economy. None of those types of regulations can get passed today period. We live in a dysfunctional political system where even the most rational ideas just get completely polarized. I think we’re in a place now where innovation used to be driven in the 50’s and the 60’s from the government, top down, and I think we’re in this really exciting place now where innovation is being driven from the bottom up, from people voting with their dollars. You have companies like Coca-Cola and McDonald’s all scrambling to try to figure out how to stay relevant in the 21st Century to a consumer that has a different sets of values than they positioned themselves for.

 

Dave:  Right. Where you spend your money will likely have a bigger impact than whichever person you vote for in a major election like that.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  It didn’t use to be that way, but it sure looks to be that way to me. I say that. I live in Canada, right? That’s my perception of how things work now. I think every time I spend a dollar. Where’s this dollar going? Does it go to something that I want to have happen? If not, can I spend that dollar somewhere else? Because every one of those dollars is a vote and it’s probably no more or less expensive of a vote than the other ones.

 

Gunnar:          It’s interesting. We are in a time where particularly if you’ve got some educational access and means, you’re going to use a phone and a computer that was probably made in very compromised labor conditions. Most of our phones were made in really devastating circumstances. We are inherently participating in a global economy now that doesn’t represent the true cost of making the items that we consume. I think that’s one of the great challenges that we face, which voting with our dollars and transparency is going to drive a lot more awareness around what are the true costs of the products we consume? Not only to ourselves, but to other people in other communities and the environment.

 

Dave:  It gets a little more complex, too. What would happen if a company approached you and they had organic produce that was raised by prisoners who were not paid a living wage?

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  What would you do?

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, we wouldn’t take that. That’s completely …

 

Dave:  Wouldn’t that be better than GMO crops produced by prisoners which is happening in the U.S. right now?

 

Gunnar:          Right, yeah.

 

Dave:  It’s such an ethical slippery slope. By the way, I would do the same thing. I’d say, “Guys, that’s not cool.” Privatized prisons? Not okay. You’re using prisoners as labor like that, no, not okay.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah.

 

Dave:  It’s an ethically slippery slope. I hope that people listening to it is they realize it matters where you buy your stuff. It matters which stuff you buy and it matters way more than you think because it comes down to are the people you’re buying it from going to take what’s left after all of the costs are done and are they going to do good things with it? Are they going to act like Costco? They pay much more than other retailers and they have good benefits. You have a philosophical decision that says, “Your employees all get the same benefits you do as a CEO,” right? Does it matter to someone who’s buying a jar of peanut butter online? Well, it should matter.

 

If people realize that they don’t have to spend more, then it’s basically a free thing you get when you buy it. That’s my perspective. Every time I spend something, I get that for free. It goes down to if you’re going to go into the store … I go to the register with an employee there instead of the self-serve checkout. You know what? I like jobs. I want people around me to have jobs because when they have jobs they’re happier. When no one has a job, people generally steal stuff from each other and it’s not a very nice place to live.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, yeah. That’s one of the challenges with the whole sharing economy now. There’s so much disruption. Technology is going to disrupt traditional jobs in a much more quickly than they can shift to new types of jobs and it’s going to create all sorts of interesting and dynamic and potentially dangerous populous strands that cause all sorts of dynamic issues for us as a society. I think the thing that is so exciting though, back to the voting with dollars piece, is that we are in a world where the biggest companies have quarterly earning reports and it doesn’t actually take much of a contraction in their business to send them into really deep profound hand wringing.

 

Now we’re seeing the first organic hamburger in Germany from McDonald’s. We’re seeing General Mills has now announced that its entire supply chain is going to be non-GMO and Campbell Soup is going non-GMO. It doesn’t actually take that much of a slow-down or a decrease in revenue and profit for these big companies to suddenly see that they actually need to wake up to the demands of this consumer that is gaining steam and using the Internet to educate and empower themselves and to vote with their dollars.

 

Dave:  That is very true. I have seen such rapid change in the 20% revenue fall for McDonald’s. I wanted to just dance in the street. The funny thing is, I don’t see McDonald’s. When I drive down the street, my brain stopped identifying that as a place to eat so the logo doesn’t have an effect on me. The store doesn’t. When people say it’s by McDonald’s, I go, “Where’s McDonald’s?” It’s not a landmark because I literally learned to not see it. I don’t know how you recover from that. My kids, they know that that’s not a place you go for food.

 

One of our nannies decided that she wanted to go to McDonald’s to get, and yes this is embarrassing, to get coffee. There’s Bulletproof coffee at my house all the time, right? She was out and about with the kids. I wasn’t that happy about it, but she took the kids to the drive-thru and they’re like, “You can drive through to get food? Oh my God,” because we don’t do fast food.

 

Gunnar:          Right.

 

Dave:  She rolls the window down and my daughter who’s maybe five at the time, she sees that you can talk to this speaker and our nanny says, “I’d like a coffee,” whatever and Anna just can’t help herself. She goes, “I’d like a poopie chemical latte, please,” which to her was like the worst thing you could possibly ask for, right? Because she knows that McDonald’s puts chemicals in food and that is the brand value of McDonald’s to my kids. Every one of her friends at school, all of them, same thing. McDonald’s does not equate food. It doesn’t equate fun. It doesn’t equate happiness.

 

You know what? I’m not sure that selling an organic hamburger is ever going to recover from that. They might’ve destroyed their brand by destroying the ecosystem and by doing all the bad stuff they did. Maybe the brand will recover. Maybe they’ll do enough good that it’ll recover. It’s going to take an awful lot for me to want to ever eat there again. I just don’t have a fundamental trust there.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, yeah. I agree. I think there’s a real credibility gap there. That said, you look at the way, and obviously Chipotle’s been going through massive issues with the breakouts that have been happening, but they’ve invested in a way that’s really differentiated and I think it has translated as a brand. They’re investing in farms and organic and regenerative agriculture and I think that’s translated to them as a brand. Ironically, they used to be owned by McDonald’s and McDonald’s sold Chipotle and Chipotle got religion on appealing to an inspirational consumer and it’s really driven a lot of success, notwithstanding the recent issues on their breakouts.

 

Dave:  Are you a fan of Clayton Christiansen? The disruptive technology author? Are you familiar with his work in strategy?

 

Gunnar:          I’m not, but I’m a fan of disruption in general so conceptually I think I’m a fan.

 

Dave:  I had disruptive technology in almost all of my job descriptions throughout my time in Silicon Valley. It always something I worked with. Clayton, I actually got to work with his consulting company once, he’s a famous Harvard guy who coined the term disruptive innovation. You’d probably enjoy his book. I forget what it’s called, but he had a big book about it. What he did was he looked at the history of hard drive manufacturers in Silicon Valley. Because it’s such a fast cycle there, you can study things that happen there in other industries. He started out by looking at railroads and how railroads disrupted each other and got disrupted and went through tech.

 

In hard drives, what happens is these upstart young Turks come along and 18 months later, they’re buying the companies who said, “Ah, that stuff will never work.” Right? Literally, 18 months later and it happens over and over. He studied why does disruption happen and what I’m seeing is the stuff that I cut my teeth on in Silicon Valley where the telephone companies got disrupted by data centers, by cloud computing, and social media and all this stuff happened, it’s happening in food right now.

 

Companies like Thrive, companies out there who, like Chipotle, they came out of nowhere and the big guys are kind of scratching their head going, “What do we do? We don’t even know what to do.” What you do is your revenues decline a bunch and then you get acquired and then they gut your storefront and put their logo on your store. I think some of that’s going to happen over the next few years in a way that no one would ever predict except Clayton. He would predict it. That’d be a good book for you to read.

 

Gunnar:          I think one of the interesting facts is you look at like Whole Foods is the largest retailers that people recognize in the health and wellness movement. Now there’s other people like Kroger and Costco that are in the system, but their market cap is $10 billion as one of the largest retailers and the most famous retailer for healthy food and they’ve really galvanized the movement in a way. They’ve had their challenges and their problems and they’ve got their reputation, but they really brought the movement together in a really powerful way and we’re all the beneficiaries of that now with our new models.

 

I think you look at their market cap relative to, say, Chipotle, which is one of a dozen fast food companies in this country and it has two and a half times the market cap, $25 billion. One of several fast food companies in this country is two and a half times the size of one of the largest health food providers in this country. That’s really an interesting fact in terms of where the market is going and how much opportunity there is for this thing to shift.

 

The sales for natural and organic products is $50 to $75 billion a year for the food itself growing at 15% per year. Even at the size, it’s still only 4% of the national CPG economy. Even at the size, only 4% of total consumer package good sales is natural and organic products. That, again, just shows you how this is going to go over the next 10 or 20 years. People are going to move towards accessing food that is healthy and putting products on their bodies which is nontoxic and I think we’re in a really unique, blessed situation to be able to facilitate that journey in a way that’s authentic and meaningful and empowering to people. That’s, to me, super exciting.

 

Dave:  It is a really cool time to be working in this strange area of providing the right food to people so that they feel amazing, which goes beyond health food. It wasn’t this easy without the Internet, without the cloud, without all the technology that supports it now. It’s really cool and now’s the time for that. This disruption is a lot of fun. Certainly what you’re doing with Thrive is a part of it.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, yeah.

 

Dave:  I have a question for you that you probably would have predicted if you’ve listened to any of the shows before. If someone came to you tomorrow, Gunnar, and they’re like, “Look, I want to perform better at every single thing I do in my life,” based on all the stuff you know, not just your business, what are the three most important things I should do? What advice would you have?

 

Gunnar:          My important pieces are getting enough sleep, courageously facing my fears every day, and eating well and getting exercise. I feel like if I do those three things … I slipped in a fourth there by eating well and getting exercise. It sounds like basic stuff, but just the simple thing of eating simple foods, chewing it well, not eating complex meals, not eating two hours before you go to bed, going to bed early, getting enough sleep, and then really doing the interpersonal work of like we all have issues that we’re confronted with in our life. The opportunity for us is to meet those issues with love and courage and recognize that we’re not going to get over them instantly and it’s a process, but to the extent that we can meet those things that we’re afraid of, we will be better, strong human beings that can add a lot more value to the world.

 

Dave:  Very well said. Thanks a lot of being on the show. People can go to ThriveMarket.com to learn more about this and to get some food at a good discount. Have an awesome day, Gunnar.

 

Gunnar:          Yeah, it was great, great to be with you. Thank you so much.

 

Dave:  If you enjoyed today’s episode, you know what to do. Go onto iTunes and click, “Hey, I like this show,” so then other people can find it. There’s some sort of rating/review process. I forget what it is, but if you go in there and say, “You know, Bulletproof Radio is helping me,” that will help others. We just crossed 30 million downloads and climbing.

 

That is 65 entire human lifetimes, if I did my math right, depending on how long you believe you’re going to live. It is my responsibility to not have murdered 65 human beings by making crappy content. I put everything I have into this show for you so that you can learn something and walk away after you hear every show knowing something you didn’t know before that’s going to help you perform better.

 

Have a beautiful day and thank you.

 

Get tons more original info to make it easier to kick more ass at life when you sign up with a free newsletter at BulletproofExec.com.

 

Stay Bulletproof.
[/expand]

Start hacking your way to better than standard performance and results.

Receive weekly biohacking tips and tech by becoming a Dave Asprey insider.

By sharing your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy